|
-
Apr 7th, 2006, 07:01 AM
#34
Re: [02/03] and [2005]
 Originally Posted by |2eM!x
Its growing on me
Anywho, is there a reason that its [2005] when the others are 02 and 03? Just wondering if its a mistake and should be [05] ?
Just wondering 
It was a decision made based on string length. We wanted it to be sufficient enough to be able to distinguish between the versions but not so long that it could interview with the actual thread title. This is why it isn't [2002/2003]. However [02/03] and [2005] are the exact same string length (6 characters)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|