Quote Originally Posted by |2eM!x
Its growing on me

Anywho, is there a reason that its [2005] when the others are 02 and 03? Just wondering if its a mistake and should be [05] ?

Just wondering
It was a decision made based on string length. We wanted it to be sufficient enough to be able to distinguish between the versions but not so long that it could interview with the actual thread title. This is why it isn't [2002/2003]. However [02/03] and [2005] are the exact same string length (6 characters)