Anonymous revised

[nebulom]

Can I do like

Cell cell = new Cell() { public Cell() { this.setColumnSpan(3); }};

Or is there any another solution? Provided I only have a blank constructor (default).

[ComputerJy]

No, you can't... The Java compiler will start a party

[System_Error]

I would try it and see. You can do the exact same thing with actionlisteners so I don't see why not. Anynonymous classes are allowed.

[ComputerJy]

I would try it and see. You can do the exact same thing with actionlisteners so I don't see why not. Anynonymous classes are allowed.

That's an interface, there is a big difference.

[System_Error]

Anonymous classes are allowed. If you think otherwise then you need a java certification book.

Neb, it seems that for an annoymous class to work you cannot have a named variable, so this should work:

new Cell() { public Cell() { this.setColumnSpan(3); }};

So you can't have a name and theirs no way to refer to them. Probably not what you are looking for, but anonymous classes ARE legal.

[System_Error]

That's an interface, there is a big difference.

No, that's an inner class implementing an interface.. there's a big difference.

[ComputerJy]

No, that's an inner class implementing an interface.. there's a big difference.

I'm good with that
But implementing A CONSTRUCTOR -- NO WAY