|
-
Feb 13th, 2001, 10:24 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Frenzied Member
I am taking algebra 1...we are doing the quadratic formula and graphing etc...someone give me a hard problem to do...
-
Feb 14th, 2001, 07:24 AM
#2
Hyperactive Member
this isn't necessarily a hard problem but it's good to be
able to understand and do:
a*x^2 + b*x + c = 0
solve this for x so that x = quadratic formula
another words, prove the quadratic formula
Bababooey
Tatatoothy
Mamamonkey
-
Feb 14th, 2001, 02:04 PM
#3
Frenzied Member
<-- I don't know what you mean Digital -->
Last edited by HarryW; Feb 14th, 2001 at 02:16 PM.
Harry.
"From one thing, know ten thousand things."
-
Feb 14th, 2001, 02:09 PM
#4
Fanatic Member
what u on about Harry? :P
Last edited by [Digital-X-Treme]; Feb 15th, 2001 at 02:47 PM.
Digital-X-Treme
Contact me on MSN Messenger: [email protected]
[VBCODE]Debug.Print Round(((1097) - ((55 ^ 5 + 311 ^ 3 - 11 ^ 3) _
/ (68 ^ 5))) ^ (1 / 7), 13)[/VBCODE]
-
Feb 14th, 2001, 02:46 PM
#5
Hyperactive Member
lol, was reading my way down the thread again and
saw harry's post and was like ***?!?!? hehe :P
yeah let steve answer it !!!! :P
Bababooey
Tatatoothy
Mamamonkey
-
Feb 14th, 2001, 03:26 PM
#6
Monday Morning Lunatic
Here's another one...use the quadratic formula to prove that all quadratics have two complex roots
I refuse to tie my hands behind my back and hear somebody say "Bend Over, Boy, Because You Have It Coming To You".
-- Linus Torvalds
-
Feb 14th, 2001, 03:40 PM
#7
Frenzied Member
You need to know about complex numbers for that though.
Harry.
"From one thing, know ten thousand things."
-
Feb 14th, 2001, 04:00 PM
#8
transcendental analytic
or you may reinvent the wheel.. Aah, let's say i=sqr(-1)..
Use  
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
Feb 14th, 2001, 05:10 PM
#9
Monday Morning Lunatic
(a + bi)^2 = a^2 + b^2
I refuse to tie my hands behind my back and hear somebody say "Bend Over, Boy, Because You Have It Coming To You".
-- Linus Torvalds
-
Feb 14th, 2001, 05:51 PM
#10
transcendental analytic
Hey parksie, put your face back, the forums won't be the same without it
Use  
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
Feb 14th, 2001, 09:35 PM
#11
Good Ol' Platypus
He's on holiday, Kedaman, he can't hear you.. No one can... sob... he's gone... 
Oh well, we wont die without Parksie on the forums, but I do like that picture of his face
All contents of the above post that aren't somebody elses are mine, not the property of some media corporation. 
(Just a heads-up)
-
Feb 15th, 2001, 07:19 AM
#12
Hyperactive Member
parksie:
don't know if that was a typo but.........
(a+bi)^2 = a^2 - b^2
Bababooey
Tatatoothy
Mamamonkey
-
Feb 15th, 2001, 03:39 PM
#13
Conquistador
Ok, here's one for anyone to do?
What is the formula to plot a love heart on a Polarmetric graph (i think?)
Calculators may be used..
-
Feb 17th, 2001, 10:10 AM
#14
Lively Member
I have tested a lot of functions, but i couldn't display a heart, but a flower: r(a)=sin(a*2)
-
Feb 17th, 2001, 05:39 PM
#15
Here's the proof for the quadratic formula:
Code:
ax^2 + bx + c = 0
x^2 + (b/a)x + (c/a) = 0
(x + b/2a)^2 - (b^2/4a^2) + (c/a) = 0
(x + b/2a)^2 = b^2/4a^2 - c/a
x + b/2a = +-sqrt(b^2/4a^2 - c/a)
x + b/2a = +-sqrt(b^2/4a^2 - 4ac/4a^2)
x + b/2a = +-sqrt[(b^2 - 4ac)/4a^2)]
x + b/2a = +-sqrt(b^2 - 4ac) / 2a
|
|
|
\/
---> x(1,2) = [-b +- sqrt(b^2 - 4ac)] / 2a <---
-
Feb 18th, 2001, 03:16 PM
#16
Conquistador
oh well, thanks, i will keep trying and hopefully post the solution here...
-
Feb 19th, 2001, 04:48 PM
#17
Member
How about this one
lets say you have two equations:
y = x*x + 6*x + 6
and
y = 2*x + 2
at what two / one / none points do they intersect?
where the the quadratic equation intersect the x-axis?
where the the quadratic equation intersect the y-axis?
Samwise Galenorn
[email protected]
e-mail for answer. if you do, make sure to attach which thread this is from.
-
Mar 12th, 2001, 03:39 PM
#18
New Member
ok..if you want a problem..I got one here..
how can I read a data in example: notepad, and plot the graph in vb?..
and how we calculate standard deviation/variant(statistical function) in vb, especially in calculating the frequency?..please help me...
-
Mar 15th, 2001, 12:32 PM
#19
Junior Member
two complex variables
if there are two complex nos and if there sum is real as well as their prod is real then prove that they have to be real nos or complex conjugates of each other
-
Mar 15th, 2001, 12:38 PM
#20
Junior Member
well
that's a good algebra question,what say you?
-
Mar 17th, 2001, 02:55 AM
#21
Addicted Member
Hi,
I got a problem and i'm trying to solve it for years together in vain. Actually I invented this problem but can't get through the answer. It would be of immense use to me if i get a satisfactory solution. It would also be useful if the arithmetics involved is simpler to program. Here is the problem. (I'm basically not a mathematics student)
Consider a Series very large number say
9807802301406403657067045034064076023
with unequal intervals,but with the same number of digits.
I want to know if thru any formula i could represent the entire series of these numbers in a shorter way(not as a series but a single number), say like this
92938829938988
or something like that.
if the number 92938829938988 is provided as input, it should be possible for getting the original series of those big numbers.
Any way? Hope i made the question clear.
It would be of immense use to me. Please help.
-
Mar 17th, 2001, 12:57 PM
#22
I don't quite understand your question.
-
Mar 20th, 2001, 04:56 PM
#23
Hyperactive Member
Take a look at this mega-cool code I wrote for shaping a form like a heart. I´m not sure if I missed some API declarations here. This is the very first time I publish this code. Please enjoy.
in a module:
Public Declare Function SetWindowRgn Lib "user32" (ByVal hwnd As Long, ByVal hrgn As Long, ByVal bRedraw As Boolean) As Long
Public Declare Function CreatePolygonRgn Lib "gdi32" (lpPoint As POINTAPI, ByVal nCount As Long, ByVal nPolyFillMode As Long) As Long
Public Type POINTAPI
x As Long
y As Long
End Type
in a botton:
Const ALTERNATE = 1
Dim sng_I As Single
Dim Pi As Double
Dim vertex(0 To 80) As POINTAPI
Dim int_I As Integer
Dim dbl_Ang As Double
Dim dbl_Radio As Double
Pi = 4 * Atn(1)
int_I = 0
sng_I = 0
Do While sng_I <= 2
dbl_Ang = sng_I * Pi
dbl_Radio = 7 + 6 * Sin(dbl_Ang)
vertex(int_I).x = 20 * (9 + dbl_Radio * Cos(dbl_Ang))
vertex(int_I).y = 20 * (3 + dbl_Radio * Sin(dbl_Ang))
sng_I = sng_I + 0.025
int_I = int_I + 1
Loop
SetWindowRgn hwnd, CreatePolygonRgn(vertex(0), UBound(vertex) + LBound(vertex) + 1, ALTERNATE), True
If things were easy, users might be programmers.
-
Mar 20th, 2001, 04:59 PM
#24
Hyperactive Member
That post was for the question of da_silvy: What is the formula to plot a love heart on a Polarmetric graph (i think?)
If things were easy, users might be programmers.
-
Mar 20th, 2001, 05:05 PM
#25
Hyperactive Member
If anyone want to solve a really nice trigonometric problem...
Determine the points(x, y) of a generic regular polygon, given the number of sides and the lenght of each side. You could start at (0, 0) for the first point and choose the direction you like.
If things were easy, users might be programmers.
-
Mar 20th, 2001, 05:33 PM
#26
transcendental analytic
Code:
a=pi2/s
r=l/(2*sin(a/2))
for n=0 to s-1
p(n).x=cos(a*n)*r
p(n).y=sin(a*n)*r
next n
Use  
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|