|
-
Feb 6th, 2001, 09:17 AM
#1
Thread Starter
transcendental analytic
I know what a dipole is but it says i have to use dipole approximation to calculate potential for a point in a electric field caused by a dipole, so what's a dipole approximation?
Use  
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
Feb 6th, 2001, 09:25 AM
#2
Fanatic Member
-
Feb 6th, 2001, 09:44 AM
#3
Thread Starter
transcendental analytic
-
Feb 6th, 2001, 09:46 AM
#4
Fanatic Member
what do you expect with a question like that mate 
Yeah, well I'm gonna build my own lunar space lander! With blackjack aaaaannd Hookers! Actually, forget the space lander, and the blackjack. Ahhhh forget the whole thing!
-
Feb 6th, 2001, 09:54 AM
#5
Thread Starter
transcendental analytic
something more complicated than that, i need a lot more variables and stuff into it!!!  I mean i know the Electric Charges the positions of them and the position where i need to calculate the potential, that's way too simplified equations at that link
Use
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
Feb 6th, 2001, 10:11 AM
#6
Fanatic Member
ok then.
taking into account that the electricity is supplied by two small hampster in a wheel connected to a dynamo. and also taking into account that these hampster's are feeling rather hungry and that there is a piece of lettuce dangling in front of them, I would say the answer to you question is 42.
Yeah, well I'm gonna build my own lunar space lander! With blackjack aaaaannd Hookers! Actually, forget the space lander, and the blackjack. Ahhhh forget the whole thing!
-
Feb 6th, 2001, 10:20 AM
#7
Thread Starter
transcendental analytic
42 makes sense
yeah that sounds reasonable, since 7*6=42
Use
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
Feb 6th, 2001, 10:28 AM
#8
Fanatic Member
that's not quite how i got the awnser I got it by
h*((a*b)/c)+d)) = 42
where
a = 7
b = 6
c = 2
d = 21
and h is how hungry the hamsters are feeling.
Sorry mate, I won't ruin your thread any more, just a little fun. I did do this all at school many a year ago, but that was many beers ago.
Ian
Yeah, well I'm gonna build my own lunar space lander! With blackjack aaaaannd Hookers! Actually, forget the space lander, and the blackjack. Ahhhh forget the whole thing!
-
Feb 6th, 2001, 10:47 AM
#9
42: possily a little bit too "Hitchhiker's Guide" for such a sensible thread.
-
Feb 6th, 2001, 12:31 PM
#10
Thread Starter
transcendental analytic
Use
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|
Reply With Quote