Seriously though - our poor and needy are cared for in regular hospitals just like the rest of us. They don't usually go to doctors, but use the emergency room. But that's part of the social-strata they are stuck in. There are many free-for-use clinics in poor areas of our country for treating people. The "state governments" pay for this with federal and state funds, just like your social health care system.
Right then:

(i) Do you gain further benefits from subscribing to an insurance scheme? That is do the people who don't subscribe get a worse service. If this is the case then even you should admit that care is about who has the most money. Is this acceptable?

(ii) Do you accept that if people are in their 'social-strata' position that they are 'stuck; there? I find this idea abhorrent (however impractical any solution may be) in any advanced nation in the world.