|
-
Jun 5th, 2005, 07:45 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Supreme User
Burning DVD Question
Im new to burning DVD's, about 2 month ago i bought a new DVD Writer which came with Nero, i tried burning my first DVD with NeroVisionExpress, went through the usual procedures (menus, visuals blah blah etc), but when it went to write it said:
Transcoding Menus
Estimated Time Left: 12hours!
I went to a computer shop and asked about good DVD-R's and i tried a Verbatim one, it cut down significantly to 4hours.
But even then thats a long time to burn a DVD, thats half a DVD, actually the film is only 480mb.
So why does it take so long to burn, and is it just me, or does anyone else find it takes to long, maybe my PC is setup wrong?
-
Jun 5th, 2005, 08:49 AM
#2
Re: Burning DVD Question
Its taken me just over 30mins to burn a back-up copy of Battle Royale on my PC, also using nero, it saved the image to my PC (which took about 30mins) then started the burn process at a decent rate (not sure how fast).
So, about an hour or so later i have a full back-up copy of my disc.
Do you have nero setup to allow the max the drive can handle ?
I'm not sure how you do this but ithink its just before you click the final "Burn" button, its there as an option, you should set it to the highest possible and test run that.
-
Jun 5th, 2005, 02:41 PM
#3
Re: Burning DVD Question
Without knowing anything about your sytem, it's hard to say for sure, but for a half a gig, that seems like a long time. Maybe you are rendering (changing the format) which would increase the time that it takes to write it.
I've made a straight copy in less than half an hour using a 1gig machine.
-
Jun 5th, 2005, 05:33 PM
#4
Thread Starter
Supreme User
Re: Burning DVD Question
Here are some specs, hope they are relevant:
Windows XP Pro SP2
Pentium III 800Mhz
80Gb IDE Maxter
128.0Mb Ram
Cibox 48x CD-R/32x DVD-R
-
Jun 5th, 2005, 11:12 PM
#5
Re: Burning DVD Question
I'd have to say that 128mb of ram is what's slowing you down. That's something that you can add for not very much money. I would install at least 512mb into your system. It's probably swapping everthing out to the hard drive, as it doesn't have enough memory to process information.
-
Jun 6th, 2005, 09:36 AM
#6
Re: Burning DVD Question
No one is asking the obvious question. What speed is the writer and what speed is the blank discs?
-
Jun 6th, 2005, 10:36 AM
#7
Re: Burning DVD Question
update your ASPI driveres to the newest verison. Those that comes with Nero is the slowest drivers I have ever seen.
ØØ
Last edited by NoteMe; Jun 7th, 2005 at 04:22 AM.
-
Jun 6th, 2005, 12:38 PM
#8
Thread Starter
Supreme User
Re: Burning DVD Question
 Originally Posted by NoteMe
update your ATAPI driveres to the newest verison. Those that comes with Nero is the slowest drivers I have ever seen.
ØØ
Where from?
Also i have tried using a Maxwell 8x DVD-R
-
Jun 7th, 2005, 02:51 AM
#9
Hyperactive Member
Re: Burning DVD Question
Transcoding
That's the keyword. Trans-anything means to go from one to another, meaning it is rewriting the data a different way, implying that Nero is manipulating the data before it is burning it! So if you are burning an AVI file, it will need to transcode it into MPG (which can be very CPU intensive). Even if you aren't burning an AVI, transcoding indicates it is not a native DVD video format.
-
Jun 7th, 2005, 04:23 AM
#10
Re: Burning DVD Question
You can download them here:
http://www.burnatonce.com/index.htm?downloads
If you get more problems then here is a help for it:
http://www.ncf.carleton.ca/~aa571/aspi.htm
PS: The burner called burnatonce used to be able to burn DVDs too. And it really good simple and fast. You can try it if it still supports DVDs.
ØØ
-
Jun 7th, 2005, 09:34 AM
#11
Thread Starter
Supreme User
Re: Burning DVD Question
 Originally Posted by Dreamlax
Transcoding
That's the keyword. Trans-anything means to go from one to another, meaning it is rewriting the data a different way, implying that Nero is manipulating the data before it is burning it! So if you are burning an AVI file, it will need to transcode it into MPG (which can be very CPU intensive). Even if you aren't burning an AVI, transcoding indicates it is not a native DVD video format.
So what are you saying, i need to convert it to MPG - otherwise nero will do it thus taking ages?
-
Jun 7th, 2005, 09:36 AM
#12
Re: Burning DVD Question
If you want to be able to watch it in your DVD player (not on your PC), you have to convert it to MPEG. If that is what you are trying to do, then yes, then that is why it takes so much time. If you are just trying to burn a data DVD with an avi file, then that is not why.
ØØ
-
Jun 7th, 2005, 09:39 AM
#13
Re: Burning DVD Question
 Originally Posted by Madboy
So what are you saying, i need to convert it to MPG - otherwise nero will do it thus taking ages?
Anything else is going to take approximatly the same amount of time to re-encode to MPEG-2.
So wether Nero does it or something like TMPGENC does it, it is still gonig to take awhile on an 800 Mhz machine.
I can rip and burn a full DVD in a total of 20-25 minutes, but that is on AMD 64 3200+, 1 gig of ram, and a 16x DVD-burner with 16x discs.
-
Jun 7th, 2005, 09:41 AM
#14
Re: Burning DVD Question
I can do it in 25-30 minutes on a 1900+ with my hacked 4x DVD burner..
-
Jun 7th, 2005, 09:51 AM
#15
Re: Burning DVD Question
 Originally Posted by NoteMe
I can do it in 25-30 minutes on a 1900+ with my hacked 4x DVD burner.. 
Ahh, but does that include riping?
-
Jun 7th, 2005, 09:59 AM
#16
Re: Burning DVD Question
Yeah, I found out that Burner was much faster then 4x. It was only a firmware upgrade needed to get it to do 12x...
-
Jun 7th, 2005, 10:06 AM
#17
Re: Burning DVD Question
Well I am still faster!
-
Jun 7th, 2005, 10:23 AM
#18
Thread Starter
Supreme User
Re: Burning DVD Question
So it needs to be MPEG, just one more question, whats the difference between MPG and MPEG? Its like that with JPG and JPEG, im confuzzled 
Thanks
-
Jun 7th, 2005, 10:39 AM
#19
-
Jun 7th, 2005, 10:53 AM
#20
Thread Starter
Supreme User
Re: Burning DVD Question
 Originally Posted by Cander
No difference.
So why do they make it confusing by putting a E in the word?
-
Jun 7th, 2005, 10:55 AM
#21
Hyperactive Member
Re: Burning DVD Question
Dreamlax
Please don't shout.
It's bad enough that I have to turn off pictures to keep my sanity and to avoid my colleagues thinking I'm playing video games each time I read these forums.
"The wise man doesn't know all the answers, but he knows where to find them."
VBForums is one place, but for the really important stuff ... here's a clue 1Tim3:15
-
Jun 7th, 2005, 11:06 AM
#22
Re: Burning DVD Question
 Originally Posted by Madboy
So why do they make it confusing by putting a E in the word? 
Whats confusing about it?
MPEG stands for Moving Picture Experts Group. Most file extensions use 3 characters back from the DOS days where you could only have 8.3 filenames, so the E was dropped for filenames.
-
Jun 8th, 2005, 06:20 AM
#23
Addicted Member
Re: Burning DVD Question
Appoligies if this has been said but if its .avi / mpg or any other video format ur burning to dvd format the program has to transcode it once transcoding is done ur only looking at about 20 mins max burning it at 4 x
However if this is a dvd disc with something else on it such as documents or any other format, other than video then there is something else wrong here
again soz if i have missed anything above
regards William
Nothing is Impossible you say?......Try slamming a revolving door!
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|