And I would also be interested in the code for the interweb, or just this msn thing.
Good point...is this a version of MSN Messenger? Or is it a LAN chat thingy?
I wrote a LAN messenger a few years back, and made it look very similar to MSN Messenger.
Good point...is this a version of MSN Messenger? Or is it a LAN chat thingy?
I wrote a LAN messenger a few years back, and made it look very similar to MSN Messenger.
Woka
I think you missed my point... which was that I don't have a point.
Right. After a week of playing with your code I gave up.
Your protocol handling is completely and utterly messed up!
In the handling of data yoh handle the command "CHG", the data that comes in from the MSN Server is:
CHG 4 NLN
CHG = Your Status Changed
4 = The TransactionID
NLN = Status Online
During your stage 1, you handle this and then reconnect to a HARD CODED IP address???! Errr? This should ONLY change your status in your UI, and NOTHING else.
The redirect command, or new connection command from the server is "FXR" (or something like that, don't have code in front of me)
This data also contains a new serverIP and port number.
Right. After a week of playing with your code I gave up.
Your protocol handling is completely and utterly messed up!
In the handling of data yoh handle the command "CHG", the data that comes in from the MSN Server is:
CHG 4 NLN
CHG = Your Status Changed
4 = The TransactionID
NLN = Status Online
During your stage 1, you handle this and then reconnect to a HARD CODED IP address???! Errr? This should ONLY change your status in your UI, and NOTHING else.
The redirect command, or new connection command from the server is "FXR" (or something like that, don't have code in front of me)
This data also contains a new serverIP and port number.
I am 100% amazed your code runs at all
Woka
Hey! I SAID it wasn't my code! It wasn't working when I got it (although it was connecting) and the code was horribly spaghetti-ed.
I hadn't analysed the connection code much other than to rewrite what it WAS doing into something more efficient.
I'll look it over (my laptop apparently doesn't have the 'license' to use rich text boxes...
Don't pay attention to this signature, it's contradictory.
alkatran, oh yea
And there's going to be another 2 DLLs added in a day or 2
DLLs are good. VERY good. I am only using 3 at the moment, 5 in total in a few days time. That's not many at all.
Why are people so scared of DLLs?