|
-
Dec 13th, 2004, 10:06 PM
#1
Minimum number of chars
Not sure if this was asked (would asume it was) but I figured I ask: why the heck there is minimum of 4 chars allowed in reply ??????????????????????????
What's wrong with simple "NO" or "YES" when someone needs only confirmation ???????????????????????
-
Dec 14th, 2004, 07:49 AM
#2
Re: Minimum number of chars
Because 4 is better than the default minimum of 10 characters. This minimum helps avoid smilie face answers and other such non-helpful responses.
Brad!
-
Dec 14th, 2004, 11:24 AM
#3
Re: Minimum number of chars
Still doesn't make any sense: it's simple enough to check for a spesific string and if reply text contains only any of those smilies abort posting ...
-
Dec 14th, 2004, 11:26 AM
#4
Re: Minimum number of chars
-
Dec 14th, 2004, 11:29 AM
#5
Re: Minimum number of chars
As you can see, Brad, all I did was replied with a single smilie which has 5 chars ...
"LOL" smilie (and perhaps some others) would have similar effect.
-
Dec 14th, 2004, 11:33 AM
#6
Re: Minimum number of chars
I don't see much point on making this a big issue. There is always a way getting out of it: just reply Yes. and with no you could have a smilie included so you'd seem friendlier.
I think I've never made a message shorter than, say, 20-30 chars.
-
Dec 14th, 2004, 11:35 AM
#7
Re: Minimum number of chars
 Originally Posted by RhinoBull
As you can see, Brad, all I did was replied with a single smilie which has 5 chars ...
"LOL" smilie (and perhaps some others) would have similar effect.
You are correct. I need to put it back to the default of 10 characters....
Right now the minimum is a value that can be set in a form. Changing this to do a more logical check (such as verifying it isn't just smilies) would require a hack to the code that really wouldn't be worth the investment of time it would take.
When people are writing a post that is less than four characters, they should probably consider whether their is any true value in their response. (I understand that "yes" and "no" responses may be of value, but adding a little more detail would be of even greater value).
And no, I'm not going to increase the minimum from 4.
Brad!
-
Dec 14th, 2004, 11:43 AM
#8
Re: Minimum number of chars
 Originally Posted by Merri
I don't see much point on making this a big issue. There is always a way getting out of it: just reply Yes. and with no you could have a smilie included so you'd seem friendlier.
I think I've never made a message shorter than, say, 20-30 chars.
I don't make it as a "big issue". However I don't think that it's the right way to validate any post - that's all.
And yes - someone needs to write a novel when "YES" or "NO" is all that's needed.
Cheers
-
Dec 16th, 2004, 04:41 AM
#9
Fanatic Member
Re: Minimum number of chars
There is always a way getting out of it
As Merri metions there is always a way around these kind of things. You could put loads of smilie faces after your "Yes" and it would be accepted, so why worry about it
 Life is one big rock tune 
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|