Online Members now located at the bottom...

[gjon]

I really liked the way it was before; showing who was online was at the top of the forum, without having to scroll to the bottom to see that information. Then it was quicker to know when someone logged out or if they just got back on. Is there any plans for change concerning this?

[NoteMe]

I guess you mean the whos veiwing a section thingy?? Well if so I have to agree. It is realy annoying to have it on the bottom.


ØØ

[NotLKH]

Hmm.
Can't seem to access the "Who's Online" Page anymore.
I get the Insufficient Access Rights page instead.

[gjon]

I guess you mean the whos veiwing a section thingy?? Well if so I have to agree. It is realy annoying to have it on the bottom.


ØØ

Yep, showing whos viewing the same forum as you. If its going to serve its usefuleness, it should go back to the top. =)

[Electroman]

Hmm.
Can't seem to access the "Who's Online" Page anymore.
I get the Insufficient Access Rights page instead.

Really? Does this happen every time as well? Just to check are you using the link from "Qucki Links" at the top? I've tested this with my regular member account and it still works for that. I can't think of any reason it should just pick you out. Wonder if its to do with the custom title you just lost .

[NoteMe]

Hmm.
Can't seem to access the "Who's Online" Page anymore.
I get the Insufficient Access Rights page instead.

Well that was not what this thread was about...but if you look in the feedback thread...the first long one, that brad started. He was kidding(???) about turning it off, and right after he said that I havn't been able to use it at all. And I am still a costum title man HeMan....

[Electroman]

Well that was not what this thread was about...but if you look in the feedback thread...the first long one, that brad started. He was kidding(???) about turning it off, and right after he said that I havn't been able to use it at all. And I am still a costum title man HeMan....

But NotLKH won a contest and had the colored one . It was only removed yestaday so I was wondering if that could be to do with it .

I thought you could use it Note? My regular member account can

[NoteMe]

Maybe it is because of your IP...

[visualAd]

I prefer it at the top too. The forum display controls are also down the bottom, it makes digging up year old threads very difficult

[NotLKH]

Its just like you said, Electro,
Its a bug where if you're not logged in, you can access Who's Online .
If You ARE logged in, then it is forbidden.

And, The Custom Title Decapitation was just coincidental with this phenomena.

-Lou

[NoteMe]

Its just like you said, Electro,
Its a bug where if you're not logged in, you can access Who's Online .
If You ARE logged in, then it is forbidden.

And, The Custom Title Decapitation was just coincidental with this phenomena.

-Lou

Well it worked for me untill Brad said he was going to shut it off. First I thougth he was serious. Then I thought he said he was kidding. But it is still not working. So I guess he was serious after all.


ØØ

[Electroman]

Well it worked for me untill Brad said he was going to shut it off. First I thougth he was serious. Then I thought he said he was kidding. But it is still not working. So I guess he was serious after all.


ØØ

My guess is that in tring to stop you seeing who was invisible he's accidently stopped you seeing it altogether. Unless of course he was serious and has just forgot to stop guests and unactivated members too .

[Electroman]

Its just like you said, Electro,
Its a bug where if you're not logged in, you can access Who's Online .
If You ARE logged in, then it is forbidden.

And, The Custom Title Decapitation was just coincidental with this phenomena.

-Lou

I was getting confussed when I saw the thing your referring to in a different thread and I thought I'd posted that here....so for any one else this issue has also been discussed here.

[NotLKH]

Any Update on the Who's Online issu?

[NotLKH]

Now it seems that even unlogged guests can't access it.
{Tells me I have no rights to view, Requires me to log in, THEN it says I don't have rights to view AFTER I log in.}

[Electroman]

Yea the post that NoteMe thought was a joke wasn't it was just Brad forgot to block Guests and others too....Not sure if he will be enabling it again, I have asked him to reconsider though .

[NoteMe]

Yea the post that NoteMe thought was a joke wasn't it was just Brad forgot to block Guests and others too....Not sure if he will be enabling it again, I have asked him to reconsider though .

Well so it wasn't a joke...well he has a very weird way of not joking compared to joking...ask him to stop that right away...

[brad jones]

The "Who's online" page was disabled because it was requested to be disabled. Those people that are surfing invisibly didn't like others knowing where they were on the forum. Seemed like a legitimate request.


It is like the request of this thread. People are asking to keep as much off the top of the page so that you can get to the threads as quickly as possible (as close to the top as possible), yet you are asking for more stuff to be put at the top. We can't have it both ways. As such, I'm likely to leave the lists of whose on line at the bottom as fewer people have complained about this than have complained about too much stuff at the top.......

(You see, I lose either way )

Brad!

[Electroman]

The "Who's online" page was disabled because it was requested to be disabled. Those people that are surfing invisibly didn't like others knowing where they were on the forum. Seemed like a legitimate request.

But regular members wouldn't be able to see the people that are invisible so it shouldn't effect them? I thinkt he only reason the issue was raised was because regular members were given Moderator access to the who's on-line page.

I agree with the Who's Browsing the same forum thing, although I miss seeing it I do prefer there being less stuff up there .

[brad jones]

I've messed with the "Who's online" settings. Regular members can now track where I'm at....

I believe the settings are now appropriate.

Brad!