Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: proof

  1. #1

    Thread Starter
    Lively Member MHENK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    99

    proof

    How would I go about proving that

    ln(3)
    ------
    ln(6)

    is irrational?
    "Have you ever woken up, looked at yourself in the mirror, and said 'screw the diet, how fat can i possibly get'?"

  2. #2
    type Woss is new Grumpy; wossname's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    #!/bin/bash
    Posts
    5,682
    There's a good chance I'm wrong here, but isn't it impossible to prove that a number is irrational? If you prove it then you have obviously found a pattern in the digits and ergo it isn't irrational. But if you use a computer to search for patterns in the digits then you would have to run the algorithm for an infinitely long time and have a number that was infinitely accurate. You'd have to stop running it at some arbitrary point. 99.999999999999999999999999% certain is still not mathematical proof.

    I'm talking from a coder's perspective though. A math jockey would probably know better.

  3. #3

    Thread Starter
    Lively Member MHENK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    99
    I believe that to prove that this is irrational, i would start by assuming that it IS rational. Then, manipulating the numbers and applying algebra SHOULD lead to a contradiction, which would prove that it is NOT rational, therefore it IS irrational.

    Assuming that ln(3)/ln(6) is rational implies that there exist integers a and b, such that ln(3)/ln(6) = a/b.

    I have no idea where to go from here, but I think my idea of a contradiction is the right way to go... somehow i need to manipulate the formula ln(3)/ln(6) = a/b into something that is a contradiction...
    "Have you ever woken up, looked at yourself in the mirror, and said 'screw the diet, how fat can i possibly get'?"

  4. #4

    Thread Starter
    Lively Member MHENK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    99
    I'm not sure if this is any progress, but now I've gotten to the point where I have

    3^a=6^b

    where a and b are both integers, not equal to zero.

    If there is any way any of you know how to prove that this is NOT true, please let me know...
    "Have you ever woken up, looked at yourself in the mirror, and said 'screw the diet, how fat can i possibly get'?"

  5. #5

    Thread Starter
    Lively Member MHENK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    99

    Resolved?!?

    Okay, i THINK i have it, see if you agree with me.

    I worked the equation out and got

    3^a=6^b.

    3^a=(2^b)(3^b)

    This cannot be true, because every integer splits uniquely into a product of primes, and if statement 2 above were true, there would be a number that split into 2 different products of primes. Therefore 3^a<>6^b. Therefore, by contradiction, ln(3)/ln(6) is irrational.

    Look right to anyone???
    "Have you ever woken up, looked at yourself in the mirror, and said 'screw the diet, how fat can i possibly get'?"

  6. #6
    New Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    11
    Ok assume ln3/ln6 = a/b
    Then 3/6 = (e^a)/(e^b)
    e^b = 2(e^a)
    b = a*ln2
    ln2 IS irrational, therefore a and b cannot BOTH be rational

    I'm not sure how strong this proof is but i dont have long and cant htink of a better 1 in 5 mins

    hope this helps

  7. #7
    New Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Chile
    Posts
    6
    Suppose that ln(3)/ln(6) is rational i.e.:

    ln(3)/ln(6)=x/y (x,y natural numbers)
    Then we have:

    3^y = 6^x

    i.e. a pair number is equal to an odd number, then ln(3)/ln(6) is irrational

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  



Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width