Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: IS VB .NET worth it?

  1. #1

    Thread Starter
    New Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    3

    IS VB .NET worth it?

    I am a happy user of VB6, and I am wondering whether I should switch over. (Note: I am not interested at all in doing internet programming). I know there are a few things in VB .NET that make it "Better", but are there enough that I should pay $110 for it, when I like using VB6 fine?

  2. #2
    Hyperactive Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    382
    All I have to say is I was very reluctant at first to switch over... And even after I switched, I kept telling myself I'm going back to VB6 because of the learning curve (never using a OOP language), but after sticking with it for a few weeks, I fell completely and utterly in love with it been well over a year and I would never consider going back.. Even without the new awesome upgrades, the OOP aspect of it (everything is an object) , I would have a hard time going back now...

  3. #3

    Thread Starter
    New Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    3
    Thanks! If I do go into VB .NET, could you reccomend any sites for the VB .NET beginner?

  4. #4
    PowerPoster
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Bristol, England (but heart is in Virginia)
    Posts
    2,949
    Hi,

    Have a look at the the Chit-Chat section and you will find an intense discussion on this subject.

    If you will be looking at producing programs on a commercial basis, or if you are looking to obtain employment as a programmer, you will be well advised to learn a Studio.NET language, and VB.NET is probably the most marketable.

    If you are programming for your own pleasure and are not concerned about internet programming, then all I can say is that I am trying to keep my customers on VB6 as long as possible. My main reason is the appalling printing routines required in .NET. (They are bad enough in VB6 but far worse in .NET).

    Repetitive coding is easier in .NET but VB6 is perfectly adequate.

    Hopefully, the new version of .NET will reverse my opinion, when it comes out.

    I am sorely tempted to investigate Borlands Delphi 8, but I have no personal nowledge of it, whereas Borlands did make a mess of moving from dBase III Plus to visual dBase - so much so it put me right off visual programming for about 8 years until VB6.
    Taxes
    The more I learn about VB.NET the more I like dBaseIII Plus

    The foregoing, whilst believed to be correct, is given without guarantee as to it's accuracy and entirely without recourse. You are required to decide for yourself whether or not it is suitable for your purposes and no liability for loss of any nature can be entertained.

  5. #5
    I'm about to be a PowerPoster! mendhak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Ulaan Baator GooGoo: Frog
    Posts
    38,170
    I really don't think a website tutorial would be very helpful when learning VB.NET. It has concepts which can be covered properly and in detail in books only.

    Else you'll have a patched-together knowledge of it. Any misconceptions or doubts you have though, can be cleared with VBForums.

  6. #6
    PowerPoster
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Bristol, England (but heart is in Virginia)
    Posts
    2,949
    Originally posted by mendhak
    Else you'll have a patched-together knowledge of it. Any misconceptions or doubts you have though, can be cleared with VBForums.
    My experience is that the learning curve goes downwards before it starts up.
    Taxes
    The more I learn about VB.NET the more I like dBaseIII Plus

    The foregoing, whilst believed to be correct, is given without guarantee as to it's accuracy and entirely without recourse. You are required to decide for yourself whether or not it is suitable for your purposes and no liability for loss of any nature can be entertained.

  7. #7
    I'm about to be a PowerPoster! mendhak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Ulaan Baator GooGoo: Frog
    Posts
    38,170
    Then the learning curve becomes a learning donut that covers the three-dimensional surface area of an orangutan's rectum.

  8. #8
    Fanatic Member pax's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    840
    Originally posted by taxes
    My experience is that the learning curve goes downwards before it starts up.
    Very true...In the beginning you might wonder why some operations are so much harder to do in NET than it was in VB6. But shortly after you will realize that there's a point to it all, and that it's actually much easier if you just do it right.

    I think the biggest hurdle to overcome is all the namespaces.
    It's annoying knowing that a function exists but not being able to find it because it's hidden in some strange namespace.
    But even that begins to make sense after a while and you will probably start putting your own functions into your own namespaces for clarity.

    All-In-All...NET Rules
    I wish I could think of something witty to put in my sig...

    ...Currently using VS2013...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  



Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width