|
-
May 2nd, 2004, 03:30 AM
#1
Russell's Paradox
And I quote
Russell's paradox is the most famous of the logical or set-theoretical paradoxes. The paradox arises within naive set theory by considering the set of all sets that are not members of themselves. Such a set appears to be a member of itself if and only if it is not a member of itself, hence the paradox.
While I have understood this, I was wondering of some examples of "sets of sets which are not members of themselves."
Off the top of my head, {NULL} would be an example. Is this correct? (How do I type that null symbol, where's NoteMe when you need him? )
Can I see more examples of such sets?
-
May 2nd, 2004, 05:03 AM
#2
Those pesky naive set theories eh?
How about {infinity}?
I don't live here any more.
-
May 2nd, 2004, 05:33 AM
#3
Frenzied Member
If I am to make a catalog of books in a library I don't include the catalog itself do I, I wound't because the reader would know where it is as they are currently reading it.
If I was now to make a catalog of all catalogs not listing themselves I would reach a paradox. If I don't include my own catalog, it is not complete. If I do include my own catalog, it does include itself, thereby making the catalog invalid.
Does that qualify?
Have I helped you? Please Rate my posts. 
-
May 2nd, 2004, 10:34 AM
#4
transcendental analytic
Re: Russell's Paradox
Originally posted by mendhak
And I quote
While I have understood this, I was wondering of some examples of "sets of sets which are not members of themselves."
Off the top of my head, {NULL} would be an example. Is this correct? (How do I type that null symbol, where's NoteMe when you need him? )
Can I see more examples of such sets?
A barber shaves everyone in the town that doesn't shave themselves.
Does he shave himself?
btw {{}} doesn't qualify.. i think note's keyboard has that o with / but i don't, so i just type {}
Use  
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
May 2nd, 2004, 10:44 AM
#5
Frenzied Member
just wondering, did my example qualify?
Have I helped you? Please Rate my posts. 
-
May 3rd, 2004, 12:45 AM
#6
I went over it briefly, but I think Acidic's example qualifies.
If {{}} doesn't qualify, does wossname's example qualify?
{infinity}
I think {infinity} would contain all sets, and therefore include itself.
-
May 3rd, 2004, 12:56 AM
#7
Re: Re: Russell's Paradox
Originally posted by kedaman
A barber shaves everyone in the town that doesn't shave themselves.
Does he shave himself?
Aah, you're getting into paradoxes now. I was just writing a compilation of paradoxes, and I did include that one as well. 
btw {{}} doesn't qualify.. i think note's keyboard has that o with / but i don't, so i just type {}
Can you explain how it doesn't qualify? It contains a ZERO number of sets which are not members of themselves.
Last edited by mendhak; May 3rd, 2004 at 01:08 AM.
-
May 3rd, 2004, 01:05 AM
#8
transcendental analytic
Originally posted by mendhak
I went over it briefly, but I think Acidic's example qualifies.
If {{}} doesn't qualify, does wossname's example qualify?
{infinity}
I think {infinity} would contain all sets, and therefore include itself.
infinity is not a number, so its not even a set
Use  
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
May 3rd, 2004, 01:07 AM
#9
transcendental analytic
Re: Re: Re: Russell's Paradox
Originally posted by mendhak
Aah, you're getting into paradoxes now. I was just writing [url href=http://www.mendhak.com/thoughts/show.php?id=72]a compilation of paradoxes[/url], and I did include that one as well. 
Can you explain how it doesn't qualify? It contains a ZERO number of sets which are not members of themselves.
I think you have misunderstood something, it contains a null set, nothing else. To qualify it needs to contain all sets that are not members of themselves. There should only be one such set though, which is the one i mentioned, but this set is a paradox, and thus brings down the whole set theory
Use  
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
May 3rd, 2004, 01:10 AM
#10
No, I get it now, I wasn't thinking of the difference between 0 and NULL.
Thanks.
-
May 4th, 2004, 06:29 AM
#11
From Mendhak's site: The sentence "This sentence is false" has no premise and there fore cannot be either true nor false. The question is undefined.
One you might like to add (although its not actually a paradox, but a self-referential statement)...
"is preceded by it's quotation." is preceded by it's quotation.
Also a paradox that is true of all PGA golf courses throughout Britain:
You cannot join a golf club unless you have had your handicap measured properly. You cannot have your handicap measured properly unless you are a member of a golf club.
I don't live here any more.
-
May 4th, 2004, 01:16 PM
#12
transcendental analytic
wossname: the sentence is a paradox:
G = G = false
=> true = false
=> false
Use  
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
May 5th, 2004, 10:47 AM
#13
I don't live here any more.
-
May 13th, 2004, 10:10 AM
#14
Frenzied Member
Re: Re: Russell's Paradox
Originally posted by kedaman
btw {{}} doesn't qualify.. i think note's keyboard has that o with / but i don't, so i just type {}
You mean: Ø 
or maybe Æ and Å ? All members of the scandinavian alphabet - and they're also part of the ascii table(obviously), so just use that instead ...
"Lies, sanctions, and cruise missiles have never created a free and just society. Only everyday people can do that."
- Zack de la Rocha
Hear me roar.
-
May 14th, 2004, 10:56 AM
#15
Originally posted by wossname
From Mendhak's site: The sentence "This sentence is false" has no premise and there fore cannot be either true nor false. The question is undefined.
One you might like to add (although its not actually a paradox, but a self-referential statement)...
"is preceded by it's quotation." is preceded by it's quotation.
Also a paradox that is true of all PGA golf courses throughout Britain:
You cannot join a golf club unless you have had your handicap measured properly. You cannot have your handicap measured properly unless you are a member of a golf club.
Duly added.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|