View Poll Results: What's your view on the new card?
- Voters
- 7. You may not vote on this poll
-
Awomse, must buy!
-
Good
-
Poor
-
Will wait for ATI's card
-
Gimme Candy!
-
Apr 14th, 2004, 11:11 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Frenzied Member
New NVIDIA Card Kicks Butt
I use Microsoft Visual Basic 2005. (Therefore, most code samples I provide will be based around the .NET Framework v2.0, unless otherwise specified)
-
Apr 15th, 2004, 12:55 AM
#2
I still don't like NVIDIA....I will waith for ATIs card....they never cheat...
But I probably can't afford a new card the next 100 years anyway...
Last edited by NoteMe; Apr 15th, 2004 at 01:37 PM.
-
Apr 15th, 2004, 11:24 AM
#3
So Unbanned
NVIDIA still can't match, nor beat ATI's image quality.
What's the point of ultra-performance when it looks like ****?
-
Apr 15th, 2004, 01:26 PM
#4
Addicted Member
I'm on ATI's side also. I've got a Radeon 9700 pro, and it's a great card. I've known a couple guys that had Nvidias, and I wasn't impressed with them.
I'll wait for the ATI response to this.
Take my love
Take my land
Take me where I cannot stand
I don't care, I'm still free
You can't take the sky from me...
-
Apr 15th, 2004, 01:37 PM
#5
I have a 9800PRO, and it is going to be much slower then the next generation, but as long as it is handling DX9b and some c and VS2 and PS2 then I am fine..
-
Apr 15th, 2004, 01:48 PM
#6
Dont care. As long as my current NVidia Quadro continues to play everything a playable speeds, why do I need to spend another 500$ to get a higher benchmark score?
-
Apr 15th, 2004, 01:52 PM
#7
To get better AA and ASAA...
-
Apr 15th, 2004, 01:53 PM
#8
-
Apr 15th, 2004, 02:48 PM
#9
Dont care much for all that. Dont need it. All i care about is my openGL overlays on my card for Maya.
And for gaming, as long as my rocket still makes you explode, Im happy.
-
Apr 15th, 2004, 04:29 PM
#10
I understand....if that is your use of a GPU then I understand why you are not using more money on it...
-
Apr 15th, 2004, 04:58 PM
#11
So Unbanned
Originally posted by Cander
Dont care much for all that. Dont need it. All i care about is my openGL overlays on my card for Maya.
And for gaming, as long as my rocket still makes you explode, Im happy.
YEA RIGHT! The guy getting 3912 FPS ON THE NEW NVIDIA POS666 WILL OWN J00000!! 
But really... I have a point. If I can get 60 FPS at a reasonable resolution... what's the problem?
-
Apr 15th, 2004, 05:21 PM
#12
Originally posted by NoteMe
I understand....if that is your use of a GPU then I understand why you are not using more money on it...
Well to be honest, my Video card was more expensive than the standard consumer card becuase of the opengl overlays. It was $700.
That is the main problem I have right now is these cards dont have those overlays, and the ones that do are in the thousands range right now
-
Apr 16th, 2004, 01:49 AM
#13
Fanatic Member
Originally posted by Cander
Well to be honest, my Video card was more expensive than the standard consumer card becuase of the opengl overlays. It was $700.
That is the main problem I have right now is these cards dont have those overlays, and the ones that do are in the thousands range right now
I vaugely recall the GeForce --> Quadro modding days...
In any case I'll wait for ATI's response.....and then pick up a 9800 XT for cheap.
-
Apr 16th, 2004, 07:10 AM
#14
Originally posted by siyan
I vaugely recall the GeForce --> Quadro modding days...
In any case I'll wait for ATI's response.....and then pick up a 9800 XT for cheap.
Why not just get a 9800PRO, you can clock it almost as fast as a 9800XT, and the 9800XT is more or less allready maxed out...
-
Apr 16th, 2004, 07:10 AM
#15
Originally posted by Cander
Well to be honest, my Video card was more expensive than the standard consumer card becuase of the opengl overlays. It was $700.
That is the main problem I have right now is these cards dont have those overlays, and the ones that do are in the thousands range right now
What kind of overlays are you talking about now? Support for something...I am not following you...
-
Apr 16th, 2004, 07:12 AM
#16
-
Apr 16th, 2004, 08:17 AM
#17
Originally posted by NoteMe
What kind of overlays are you talking about now? Support for something...I am not following you...
OpenGL hardware overlays.
It's something usually only software emulated, but application like Maya use the hardware version for real time hardware rendering in view ports. Handy for when working with things like particles.
-
Apr 16th, 2004, 12:09 PM
#18
So Unbanned
Originally posted by Cander
OpenGL hardware overlays.
It's something usually only software emulated, but application like Maya use the hardware version for real time hardware rendering in view ports. Handy for when working with things like particles.
I use MAX... I also use software rendering.
-
Apr 17th, 2004, 06:30 AM
#19
Originally posted by Cander
OpenGL hardware overlays.
It's something usually only software emulated, but application like Maya use the hardware version for real time hardware rendering in view ports. Handy for when working with things like particles.
Hmmm sounds weird... ...not that I do any 3D modelling anyway...
-
Apr 18th, 2004, 03:40 PM
#20
So Unbanned
ATI response will be the R420PRO, which will compete with the non-ultra version of Nvidia's GeForce 6800 card. That will be followed up by the R420XT, with 16 pipelines , and will compete with the GeForce 6800 Ultra. They should be out in less than one month.
I currently have a Radeon 9000 Pro 128 MB video card, so I'll probably still be waiting to upgrade for a while.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|