|
-
Feb 8th, 2004, 12:58 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Addicted Member
Best Linux for server?
Well the subject says it all, what is the best variation of Linux if I wanted to have a server and run a web-site? I heard RedHat is good, but don't know what it's good for.
Thanks.
-
Feb 8th, 2004, 05:12 PM
#2
Good Ol' Platypus
I'd use Debian. If you're a bit more of a risky-type fellow, try Gentoo.
http://www.debian.org/
http://www.gentoo.org/
All contents of the above post that aren't somebody elses are mine, not the property of some media corporation. 
(Just a heads-up)
-
Feb 8th, 2004, 09:47 PM
#3
Hyperactive Member
Re: Best Linux for server?
Originally posted by Dude1
Well the subject says it all, what is the best variation of Linux if I wanted to have a server and run a web-site? I heard RedHat is good, but don't know what it's good for.
Thanks.
Redhat
-
Feb 8th, 2004, 10:18 PM
#4
Good Ol' Platypus
Wonderful argument, good reasons too 
You know RedHat isn't free anymore.
All contents of the above post that aren't somebody elses are mine, not the property of some media corporation. 
(Just a heads-up)
-
Feb 8th, 2004, 10:32 PM
#5
Gentoo SELinux
It'll take you FOREVER to set it up, but it will literally be UNHACKABLE if you do it right.
You can set everything from how much ram the system can use, which com ports can be used and when, who can type the letter W in the command prompt. You can set EVERYTHING and if you make a mistake setting it up, it can take days to fix it. Hell, it can take a day or two just to get it to boot, lol.
But if you don't want to go through SELinux's setup, just use Gentoo. It'll be much faster than Debian and has the best package handling system out their in a Linux distro.
-
Feb 8th, 2004, 10:33 PM
#6
Originally posted by Sastraxi
Wonderful argument, good reasons too 
You know RedHat isn't free anymore.
There is a free version of Fendora and RedHat 7.3 is still available (I think most servers still use that).
-
Feb 9th, 2004, 01:40 AM
#7
Hyperactive Member
Originally posted by Sastraxi
Wonderful argument, good reasons too 
You know RedHat isn't free anymore.
You never asked me to give reasons I just flat out told you what was best.**Statement removed**
Last edited by IntelSucks; Feb 10th, 2004 at 11:28 AM.
-
Feb 9th, 2004, 07:50 AM
#8
-
Feb 9th, 2004, 12:12 PM
#9
Hyperactive Member
Yes, www.LinuxIso.org is awesome thats where I get everything.
-
Feb 9th, 2004, 04:35 PM
#10
Good Ol' Platypus
So, justify it being "better" is my point. You can't just say "better"... I think Gentoo is better. Are we both wrong? Are we both right?
All contents of the above post that aren't somebody elses are mine, not the property of some media corporation. 
(Just a heads-up)
-
Feb 9th, 2004, 04:46 PM
#11
Source based distrobutions like Gentoo are best for a server for the simple fact that you can keep out the useless bloat of desktop features. Although you may not notice notice any big difference, the question was better, so there is the answer.
In practical terms, Linux is Linux no matter how you slice it. The software you run on it is what will determine security. And all Linux distro's run the same software.
But again if you just want that feeling of having the most tweaked, and optimized system, Gentoo is a top choice. Plus it has the best command line package installation and updating system which is the best feature to me. emerge. Certainly a plus to update your server remotely via shell access.
Say you need to update an app with an rpm. Your first have to download it manually somehow, and upload, and make sure you have the dependencies, and so on.
With emerge, you type emerge sync. Let it finish the update then emerge package-name. It will download, compile and install the app and get any dependencies you will need for it.
Good stuff. That alone makes Gentoo worth the extra install time.
Last edited by Cander; Feb 9th, 2004 at 04:50 PM.
-
Feb 9th, 2004, 10:27 PM
#12
Originally posted by IntelSucks
And gentoo is cool but its not as GOOD as redhat.
Wow, you know nothing of L00nix
Gentoo > RedHat. You can install EVERYTHING on Gentoo that you can install on RedHat, but it'll be optimized for your system AND you configure what parts you want. It is also easier to update.
-
Feb 10th, 2004, 11:30 AM
#13
Hyperactive Member
Originally posted by kasracer
Wow, you know nothing of L00nix
Gentoo > RedHat. You can install EVERYTHING on Gentoo that you can install on RedHat, but it'll be optimized for your system AND you configure what parts you want. It is also easier to update.
Alright settle down...Jeez Louise, no one can have opinions around here anymore....
Kasracer is always right everyone, just to let you know.
-
Feb 10th, 2004, 09:03 PM
#14
Lively Member
-
Feb 10th, 2004, 09:42 PM
#15
Originally posted by IntelSucks
Kasracer is always right everyone, just to let you know.
Everyone already knows this 
-
Feb 11th, 2004, 12:48 PM
#16
Hyperactive Member
Originally posted by kasracer
Everyone already knows this 
You are starting to annoy me.
-
Feb 11th, 2004, 01:07 PM
#17
Fanatic Member
Originally posted by IntelSucks
You are starting to annoy me.
Now now children... play nicely.
-
Feb 12th, 2004, 04:59 PM
#18
Hyperactive Member
Originally posted by VisionIT
Now now children... play nicely.
VisionIT, you are even more annoying.
-
Feb 12th, 2004, 05:36 PM
#19
Fanatic Member
I left this forum months ago... and you two were bitching at each other then... and you're still at it now.
You're just as bad as each other.
You both seem to have completely different views on practically everything thats posted on VBF, but your constant arguments are becoming tiring.
Stop looking for chances to dig at each other, stop procrastinating and get on with the thread.
-
Feb 12th, 2004, 08:59 PM
#20
Hyperactive Member
Originally posted by VisionIT
I left this forum months ago... and you two were bitching at each other then... and you're still at it now.
You're just as bad as each other.
You both seem to have completely different views on practically everything thats posted on VBF, but your constant arguments are becoming tiring.
Stop looking for chances to dig at each other, stop procrastinating and get on with the thread.
You are so stupid, what are you talking about? Kasracer and I usually agree on things except he just trys to make EVERYONE look stupid....It's you I don't get along with.
-
Feb 12th, 2004, 09:43 PM
#21
-
Feb 13th, 2004, 01:05 AM
#22
Hyperactive Member
No, your not ALWAYS right, you just think you are because of your opinions.
Sometimes you are right and sometimes you state your opinion and no one elses matters...but we all do that every now and then I guess.
-
Feb 13th, 2004, 06:12 AM
#23
Fanatic Member
Originally posted by IntelSucks
You are so stupid, what are you talking about? Kasracer and I usually agree on things except he just trys to make EVERYONE look stupid....It's you I don't get along with.
What can you say to that?
-
Feb 14th, 2004, 01:11 PM
#24
Hyperactive Member
-
Feb 15th, 2004, 09:51 AM
#25
Monday Morning Lunatic
*separates the children*
Stop that, or no dessert!
One thing to watch for is SCSI support, which you're more likely to end up having on a server than a normal system. Not a single distro I tried would install on ours :P Too little RAM for RedHat (80M), no support for card in Slack or Debian's installers.
Eventually gave up and put OpenBSD on 
If you can get it to work, I'd probably go Debian. Gentoo is nice (I use it on my desktop), but a secure system doesn't really need a compiler does it; depends where your priorities are.
I refuse to tie my hands behind my back and hear somebody say "Bend Over, Boy, Because You Have It Coming To You".
-- Linus Torvalds
-
Feb 15th, 2004, 06:25 PM
#26
I use Gentoo for the server, but it's only a small one. And I use Gentoo on another computer (and soon a third), so I will set up the server so that it serves as a local rsync mirror. Then I can quickly update all three computers with only a single external sync, and generally maintaining is easier if it's the same system everywhere. Besides, I'm learning a lot about Linux, like how to get shorewall running despite missing kernel modules 
Yeah, gotta recompile...
The last server was e-smith, which is based on RedHat. But the rpm management is so complicated that I never managed to update glibc, and thus never managed to update anything, and thus the whole system was terribly outdated. Still using 2.2 kernel. When I tried to install a newer version of e-smith from scratch, the BIOS didn't recognize the CD (Pentium 133, dates somewhere back to 1994 or so ).
All the buzzt
 CornedBee
"Writing specifications is like writing a novel. Writing code is like writing poetry."
- Anonymous, published by Raymond Chen
Don't PM me with your problems, I scan most of the forums daily. If you do PM me, I will not answer your question.
-
Feb 15th, 2004, 06:27 PM
#27
I tried Debian once for my work laptop. But I didn't manage to get it to installing recent packages. Might be nice for a server to have a stable system, but for my work computer I want something more recent than KDE 2 or Gnome 1.
All the buzzt
 CornedBee
"Writing specifications is like writing a novel. Writing code is like writing poetry."
- Anonymous, published by Raymond Chen
Don't PM me with your problems, I scan most of the forums daily. If you do PM me, I will not answer your question.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|