Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: BTX, SATA, 64bit. Oh my.

  1. #1

    Thread Starter
    Banished Cander's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Why do you care?
    Posts
    6,913

    BTX, SATA, 64bit. Oh my.

    What other new techs we have coming that is about to make everything obsolete?



    Looking to start building a new system, but want to know what to expect as far as new keywords when ordering stuff in the coming months.
    Stack Overflow
    See the features of Visual Studio 2010 and C# 4.0: The 10-4 show on Channel9

  2. #2
    Your Ad Here! Edneeis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    Moreno Valley, CA (SoCal)
    Posts
    7,339
    You might want to wait for PCI Express which uses the BTX form factor. That will effect all of your components.

  3. #3

    Thread Starter
    Banished Cander's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Why do you care?
    Posts
    6,913
    Any new memory name changes?
    Stack Overflow
    See the features of Visual Studio 2010 and C# 4.0: The 10-4 show on Channel9

  4. #4
    Fanatic Member VisionIT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Workin'...
    Posts
    718
    Originally posted by Cander
    Any new memory name changes?
    Can't remember any!

  5. #5
    Retired G&G Mod NoteMe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    @ Opera Software
    Posts
    10,190
    Can anyone elaborate on what BTX is? I guess SATA is some sort of controller or something?

  6. #6
    Frenzied Member Ideas Man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,718
    SATA (Serial ATA) is to replace parallel ATA. Sposed to offer much higher transfer speeds, but currently, they are the same. Easier to connect though, no jumpers required. BTX sounds like a new type of power supply.
    I use Microsoft Visual Basic 2005. (Therefore, most code samples I provide will be based around the .NET Framework v2.0, unless otherwise specified)

  7. #7
    Retired G&G Mod NoteMe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    @ Opera Software
    Posts
    10,190
    I suessed that SATA was that. Thanks...and for me BTX sounds like a new "standard" for the size and layout of the mother board and other cards in a tower...

  8. #8
    Frenzied Member Ideas Man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,718
    That makes more sense actually. Look on the Intel website for more info about it, i remember seeing it there somewhere.
    I use Microsoft Visual Basic 2005. (Therefore, most code samples I provide will be based around the .NET Framework v2.0, unless otherwise specified)

  9. #9
    Retired G&G Mod NoteMe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    @ Opera Software
    Posts
    10,190
    You where right....

    Balanced Technology Extended (BTX) is a new interface specification that provides a common, flexible foundation, based on standards that can be used to build innovative desktop systems. Systems need to incorporate the latest performance technologies, yet still meet increasing thermal, power, structural, acoustic, and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) requirements. The BTX specification provides new tools and design space (Figure 1) for developers to lay out desktop systems, whether designing small, compact systems or very large, expandable systems. BTX is also optimized for the newest desktop technologies, including PCI Express* and
    Serial ATA.
    http://www.intel.com/update/contents/dt10031.htm

  10. #10
    Frenzied Member Ideas Man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,718
    In what way?
    I use Microsoft Visual Basic 2005. (Therefore, most code samples I provide will be based around the .NET Framework v2.0, unless otherwise specified)

  11. #11
    Retired G&G Mod NoteMe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    @ Opera Software
    Posts
    10,190
    In what way about BTX or that you where right about beein an article at intel.com....you where at least right about the second thing...

  12. #12
    Frenzied Member Ideas Man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,718
    LOL, ok.
    I use Microsoft Visual Basic 2005. (Therefore, most code samples I provide will be based around the .NET Framework v2.0, unless otherwise specified)

  13. #13

    Thread Starter
    Banished Cander's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Why do you care?
    Posts
    6,913
    Right. BTX is a new form factor to replace ATX.
    Stack Overflow
    See the features of Visual Studio 2010 and C# 4.0: The 10-4 show on Channel9

  14. #14
    Hyperactive Member made_of_asp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    123 Fake Street
    Posts
    394
    Regarding BTX, this might be interesting:

    http://www.anandtech.com/showdoc.html?i=1876&p=4
    VS.NET 2003

    Need to email me?

  15. #15
    Retired G&G Mod NoteMe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    @ Opera Software
    Posts
    10,190
    Wow:

    x16 PCI Express implementation that offers 8GB/s of bandwidth.
    Actually how fast is a AGP slot?

  16. #16
    Frenzied Member Ideas Man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,718
    Supposed to be faster than that i think, it will eliminate the need for an AGP slot.
    I use Microsoft Visual Basic 2005. (Therefore, most code samples I provide will be based around the .NET Framework v2.0, unless otherwise specified)

  17. #17
    So Unbanned DiGiTaIErRoR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 1999
    Location
    /dev/null
    Posts
    4,111
    I don't know if the AGP idea will become fully obsolete, atleast there's room for revision, and offering multiplied speeds, as AGP has always been designed for. Sadly though the current AGP will become basically obsolete, only partially will it be supported by ATI. But perhaps we'll see a video card port based on HyperTransport technology. And PCI-Express isn't as flexible as InfiniBand, and doesn't have the bandwidth that HyperTransport does, which means PCI-Express isn't as well suited for communication with the RAM.

    Hypertransport on a 64 bit system allows 12800 MB/s, compared to PCI-Express, which would be 500 MB/s, taken times the multiplier(16x for example would be 8000 MB/s).

    For example, want to know why nVidia boards are fast? There are some that utilize HyperTransport, and they can be implemented transparently to the standard system.
    Last edited by DiGiTaIErRoR; Feb 13th, 2004 at 02:59 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  



Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width