|
-
Jan 26th, 2004, 05:09 PM
#1
mac osx on pc?
I'd heard that someone had done this... I know there are some mac emulators out but they all seem very crappy. Is there anything that would run mac osx on a pc?
rate my posts if they help ya!
Extract thumbnail without reading the whole image file: (C# - VB)
Apply texture to bitmaps: (C# - VB)
Extended console library: (VB)
Save JPEG with a certain quality (image compression): (C# - VB )
VB.NET to C# conversion tips!!
-
Jan 26th, 2004, 06:19 PM
#2
Currently, there is no emulator that supports OS X.
-
Jan 27th, 2004, 01:39 AM
#3
Originally posted by kasracer
Currently, there is no emulator that supports OS X.
well then lets write one! we'll write it in vb (vb6 probably). will work! definetly!
hehe
rate my posts if they help ya!
Extract thumbnail without reading the whole image file: (C# - VB)
Apply texture to bitmaps: (C# - VB)
Extended console library: (VB)
Save JPEG with a certain quality (image compression): (C# - VB )
VB.NET to C# conversion tips!!
-
Jan 27th, 2004, 01:47 AM
#4
Originally posted by MrPolite
well then lets write one! we'll write it in vb (vb6 probably). will work! definetly!
hehe
Yes go do it in VB. I'm sure the icons that bounce in OS X will bouncy at 1fpm (frames per minute) in the emulator.
-
Jan 27th, 2004, 03:26 PM
#5
Monday Morning Lunatic
Darwin itself (the core of OSX) works on i386, I believe.
I'm not aware of the interface layers working, however, since they're Apple proprietary.
I refuse to tie my hands behind my back and hear somebody say "Bend Over, Boy, Because You Have It Coming To You".
-- Linus Torvalds
-
Jan 28th, 2004, 12:08 AM
#6
Originally posted by parksie
Darwin itself (the core of OSX) works on i386, I believe.
I'm not aware of the interface layers working, however, since they're Apple proprietary.
oh talking about i386.... apple had a plan to do this with mac os 7 I believe (I'm not much into macs, I havent even worked more than a total of 3 hours with a mac comp so I may be wrong)
anyways, I heard that they're planning to do this agian, with a future mac os.... would be nice ha people would switch from windows to macos
anyways now that it's based on unix (BSD?) isn't it much easier than before to port the os?
rate my posts if they help ya!
Extract thumbnail without reading the whole image file: (C# - VB)
Apply texture to bitmaps: (C# - VB)
Extended console library: (VB)
Save JPEG with a certain quality (image compression): (C# - VB )
VB.NET to C# conversion tips!!
-
Jan 29th, 2004, 01:34 AM
#7
Dazed Member
Posted by parksie
I'm not aware of the interface layers working, however, since they're Apple proprietary.
Isn't everything with Apple proprietary.
-
Jan 29th, 2004, 01:31 PM
#8
Hyperactive Member
Basilik II works five with OS 7 and 8.. OSx runs on a G3 or higher which is way more powerful then the 68xxx (PPC). There fore, it's harder to emulate.
it might be easier if the kernel was recompiled with the i386 libraries rather than with the PPC ones.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|