Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 46

Thread: haha

  1. #1

    Thread Starter
    Addicted Member dolor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    in a place seldom found on a map
    Posts
    220

    haha

    If 2x+1 = 8, find the value of 4x+1.
    - you've been privileged to read a post by Miz

  2. #2
    Lively Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Guildford, UK
    Posts
    91
    Isn't that just 15?

  3. #3
    Frenzied Member Acidic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,090
    that's what seems obvious, have we missed something? maybe you are using a different number system? Why would this thread be called haha?
    Have I helped you? Please Rate my posts.

  4. #4
    type Woss is new Grumpy; wossname's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    #!/bin/bash
    Posts
    5,682
    Its evidently a conspiracy that stems back to Roswell and JFK.

  5. #5
    pathfinder NotLKH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Posts
    2,397
    Hmmm, if he meant to use [sup] tags, but somehow forgot, then it becomes more interesting:

    If 2x+1 = 8, find the value of 4x+1.


    50.

    Thats the answer, now how's its done without a calculator?



  6. #6
    Frenzied Member Acidic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,090
    Using a calculator I get the same answer, but using pen and paper I get 65.
    2x+1=8
    can be written as:
    2x+20=23 right?
    As they are all to the same base we can re-write it to:
    x+0=3
    x=3

    putting that in the other eqn:
    43+1 = 65

    confused :sigh:
    Someone tell me where I went wrong.
    Have I helped you? Please Rate my posts.

  7. #7
    Retired G&G Mod NoteMe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    @ Opera Software
    Posts
    10,190
    Originally posted by NotLKH

    Thats the answer, now how's its done without a calculator?



    Draw it on a pwace of paper........y=4^x +1

  8. #8
    Retired G&G Mod NoteMe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    @ Opera Software
    Posts
    10,190
    Originally posted by Acidic
    Using a calculator I get the same answer, but using pen and paper I get 65.
    2x+1=8
    can be written as:
    2x+20=23 right?
    As they are all to the same base we can re-write it to:
    x+0=3
    x=3

    putting that in the other eqn:
    43+1 = 65

    confused :sigh:
    Someone tell me where I went wrong.

    Your problem is that you are ignoring the +1. You think that you can write it as 2^0 that seems logical. But you can't. You first have to take it over to the other side. Like this.

    2^x + 1 = 8

    becomes

    2^x = 7

    then you can do as you did.

    2^x = 2^2.807354922

    then:

    x = 2.807354922


    then:

    4^x + 1 = 50

    UNderstand?

  9. #9
    Only Slightly Obsessive jemidiah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    2,431
    Using logarithms:


    2x + 1 = 8
    2x = 7

    Basic logarithm formula:
    bx = c
    Ex. log(100) = 2 [Note: 'log' is called Common Logarithm which is in base 10.]
    So, b = 10, c = 100, x = 2

    So
    2x = 7 would make

    log(7) in base 2 = log(7)/log(2)

    So x = 2.8073549220576041074419693172318 like has been stated.

    42.8073549220576041074419693172318 + 1 = 50, again, like has been stated.

    The time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time.
    Bertrand Russell

    <- Remember to rate posts you find helpful.

  10. #10
    Retired G&G Mod NoteMe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    @ Opera Software
    Posts
    10,190
    Originally posted by jemidiah
    Using logarithms:


    2x + 1 = 8
    2x = 7

    Basic logarithm formula:
    bx = c
    Ex. log(100) = 2 [Note: 'log' is called Common Logarithm which is in base 10.]
    So, b = 10, c = 100, x = 2

    So
    2x = 7 would make

    log(7) in base 2 = log(7)/log(2)

    So x = 2.8073549220576041074419693172318 like has been stated.

    42.8073549220576041074419693172318 + 1 = 50, again, like has been stated.


    Yeah that is the calculator way to do it.......but can you calculate Log in your head????

  11. #11
    Only Slightly Obsessive jemidiah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    2,431
    I'd thought you meant you used a Solve function or similar on a calculator

    As for logarithms without a calculator, I'd assume it's related to the roots question in that it most likely uses some converging series.
    The time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time.
    Bertrand Russell

    <- Remember to rate posts you find helpful.

  12. #12
    Retired G&G Mod NoteMe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    @ Opera Software
    Posts
    10,190
    Yeah probably. I have never seen Acidics way of doing it. But I liked it. With the right numbers it can be pretty easy to solve the problem.....

  13. #13
    Fanatic Member sql_lall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Up Above (i.e. AUS)
    Posts
    571

    Talking easy

    2x+1=8
    => 2x = 7
    => 2x * 2x = 7 * 7
    => 4x = 49
    => 4x + 1 = 50 !!!

    no calculator needed


    BTW:
    ax+ay=az doesn't mean x+y=z.
    However, ax*ay=az does
    Last edited by sql_lall; Dec 15th, 2003 at 03:44 AM.
    sql_lall

  14. #14
    Retired G&G Mod NoteMe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    @ Opera Software
    Posts
    10,190
    Wow...it looks like it works too...I am impressed sql_lall....

  15. #15
    Lively Member Something Else's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Where Humboldt Intersects Carlson
    Posts
    99

    Re: easy

    Originally posted by sql_lall
    2x+1=8
    => 2x = 7
    => 2x * 2x = 7 * 7
    => 4x = 49
    => 4x + 1 = 50 !!!
    Very Nice!

    -Lou

  16. #16
    Frenzied Member Acidic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,090
    very nice, but does it always work?
    Have I helped you? Please Rate my posts.

  17. #17
    Retired G&G Mod NoteMe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    @ Opera Software
    Posts
    10,190
    Originally posted by Acidic
    very nice, but does it always work?

    Yeah it will always work. Because you have

    2^x + 1 = 8

    2^x = 7 <-- remember this

    And you can always multiply with the same number on both side. So if what I wrote over is true the "number" 2^x = the number 7

    So the multiply "7" on both side will give you.

    2^x * 2^x = 7 * 7

    That gives you:

    2^2x = 49

    You can rewrite that to

    4^x = 49

    And that you can rewrite to

    4^x + 1 = 50


    QED....

  18. #18
    Frenzied Member Acidic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,090
    2^x = 7 <-- remember this

    And you can always multiply with the same number on both side. So if what I wrote over is true the "number" 2^x = the number 7

    So the multiply "7" on both side will give you.

    2^x * 2^x = 7 * 7
    Basically you squared both sides.

    That is a very nice method.
    Have I helped you? Please Rate my posts.

  19. #19
    Retired G&G Mod NoteMe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    @ Opera Software
    Posts
    10,190
    Originally posted by Acidic
    Basically you squared both sides.
    As you will fancy-smancy english writing UK guy.... J/K

  20. #20
    Frenzied Member Acidic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,090
    Actually I'm Swedish, but now live and study in wales.
    Though I will be going back to sweden for Xmas.
    Have I helped you? Please Rate my posts.

  21. #21
    Retired G&G Mod NoteMe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    @ Opera Software
    Posts
    10,190
    Hehe...ok then.......but I was thinking about it when I went to the toilet. And what I said is not the same thing as what you said. But the answer is the same. You are always allowed to do the same thing on both sides of the equation. And I multiplied "7" on both sides, and you squared it....the same answer, but not the same way....

  22. #22
    Frenzied Member Acidic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,090
    anyway, all this is based on that Dolor forgot the [sup] tags.
    Have I helped you? Please Rate my posts.

  23. #23
    Retired G&G Mod NoteMe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    @ Opera Software
    Posts
    10,190
    Originally posted by Acidic
    anyway, all this is based on that Dolor forgot the [sup] tags.

    Yeah....or did he???...

  24. #24
    transcendental analytic kedaman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    0x002F2EA8
    Posts
    7,221
    I don't want to be a hypocrit but you have too much time on your hand
    Use
    writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
    writing haskell makes your life easier:
    reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
    To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.

  25. #25
    Frenzied Member Acidic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,090
    Is that a bad thing?
    Have I helped you? Please Rate my posts.

  26. #26
    Retired G&G Mod NoteMe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    @ Opera Software
    Posts
    10,190
    Originally posted by kedaman
    I don't want to be a hypocrit but you have too much time on your hand

    Who where you talking too.....I don't have that ....I have Database exam tomorrow....

  27. #27
    transcendental analytic kedaman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    0x002F2EA8
    Posts
    7,221
    note: and what have you been doing all day
    acidic: dunno, but I had to put a disclaimer so i wouldn't be called hypocrit just in case
    Use
    writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
    writing haskell makes your life easier:
    reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
    To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.

  28. #28
    Retired G&G Mod NoteMe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    @ Opera Software
    Posts
    10,190
    Originally posted by kedaman
    note: and what have you been doing all day
    I have been:

    SELECT K.hypocritIndex
    FROM KEDA K
    WHERE K.name = 'Jerk'
    GROUP BY K.hypocritIndex
    HAVE COUNT(*) > 99999999


    ANd guess what came out..... You did....


    J/K

  29. #29
    transcendental analytic kedaman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    0x002F2EA8
    Posts
    7,221
    yeah try that in your exam note, and see what you get

    SELECT note.exam WHERE note.score=0 FROM database.exam
    Use
    writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
    writing haskell makes your life easier:
    reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
    To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.

  30. #30
    Retired G&G Mod NoteMe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    @ Opera Software
    Posts
    10,190
    Originally posted by kedaman
    yeah try that in your exam note, and see what you get

    SELECT note.exam WHERE note.score=0 FROM database.exam

    Hehe...you are funny....

    Answer := project name, ***, country (select name = 'Keda' (VBForum product CCF));


    output:

    Keda, True, Finland.




  31. #31
    transcendental analytic kedaman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    0x002F2EA8
    Posts
    7,221
    whats those three stars for? btw I haven't taken the database course yet, so I haven't got a score yet
    Use
    writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
    writing haskell makes your life easier:
    reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
    To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.

  32. #32
    Retired G&G Mod NoteMe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    @ Opera Software
    Posts
    10,190
    Originally posted by kedaman
    whats those three stars for? btw I haven't taken the database course yet, so I haven't got a score yet
    *** = BØG = ****** = Gay = Homo...and so on....

  33. #33
    transcendental analytic kedaman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    0x002F2EA8
    Posts
    7,221
    Originally posted by NoteMe
    *** = BØG = ****** = Gay = Homo...and so on....
    yeah and you forgot the last thing.. = Note
    Use
    writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
    writing haskell makes your life easier:
    reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
    To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.

  34. #34
    Retired G&G Mod NoteMe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    @ Opera Software
    Posts
    10,190
    Yeah "Note that Keda is a bøg"....

  35. #35
    Frenzied Member Acidic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,090
    or is he a bög maybe?
    j/k
    Have I helped you? Please Rate my posts.

  36. #36
    Retired G&G Mod NoteMe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    @ Opera Software
    Posts
    10,190
    Wow...Norway Sweden and Finland in the same thread.......calling each other Bøg, Bög, Bøgis.......this is great...

  37. #37
    Frenzied Member Acidic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,090
    no terve. Minä haluan [****, I don't know icecream in finnish]
    ok:
    Hallo, Ich will Glass ******. (?)
    Have I helped you? Please Rate my posts.

  38. #38
    Retired G&G Mod NoteMe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    @ Opera Software
    Posts
    10,190
    Je ne pas parle 'Germen"....

  39. #39
    Frenzied Member Acidic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,090
    et je parle francais mais avec tres difficulte.
    Have I helped you? Please Rate my posts.

  40. #40
    Retired G&G Mod NoteMe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    @ Opera Software
    Posts
    10,190
    Tu parle francais trés bien. Mais je ne meme pas ma francais.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  



Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width