|
-
Aug 22nd, 2003, 04:18 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Good Ol' Platypus
The infinite cat and butter toast thingey
Argh.
If you strapped a piece of toast with butter up to the back of the cat, then if the cat landed, the butter WOULD NOT have landed and thus you don't need to rationalise anything. Therefore the cat will land and promptly begin to eat the toast.
All contents of the above post that aren't somebody elses are mine, not the property of some media corporation. 
(Just a heads-up)
-
Aug 22nd, 2003, 08:24 PM
#2
Fanatic Member
Where is my cranberry sauce?
-
Aug 23rd, 2003, 12:42 AM
#3
But if the toast landed, the cat would NOT have landed. How do you determine whether the toast lands or the cat lands? It's still a problem in quantum indecision.
Last edited by mendhak; Aug 23rd, 2003 at 12:46 AM.
-
Aug 23rd, 2003, 06:53 AM
#4
Fanatic Member
Actually it has been scientifically proven that the cat and the toast reach a state of quantum indeterminance at the half way point of the fall and end up just hovering until an external event breaks the deadlock.
Martin J Wallace (Slaine)
-
Aug 23rd, 2003, 07:23 PM
#5
-
Aug 23rd, 2003, 07:31 PM
#6
Fanatic Member
What if the toast is gay?
-
Aug 23rd, 2003, 10:57 PM
#7
"The Infinite Cat"
hmmmm,
Silverburg???
-
Aug 23rd, 2003, 10:59 PM
#8
keekleberries with waffles
-
Aug 23rd, 2003, 11:57 PM
#9
Fanatic Member
Why wouldn't they land on their side?
"Can't" and "shouldn't" are two totally separate things.
All questions should be answered. All answers should be true. That is why I post.
-
Aug 24th, 2003, 12:09 AM
#10
Frenzied Member
cuz they cant! the cat allways land on its feets while the toast allways land with the butter down!
-
Aug 24th, 2003, 12:14 AM
#11
Fanatic Member
So they will cancel out iff toast and cat have equal forces.
Now, if the combination was off-centered, would it cause a rotation?
"Can't" and "shouldn't" are two totally separate things.
All questions should be answered. All answers should be true. That is why I post.
-
Aug 24th, 2003, 01:36 AM
#12
Actually, a state of quantum indeterminence would already imply rotation.
If the cat-toast combination were to hover, then which side would be facing the floor? I say neither, so it would rotate.
-
Aug 24th, 2003, 05:38 AM
#13
Fanatic Member
Originally posted by mendhak
Actually, a state of quantum indeterminence would already imply rotation.
If the cat-toast combination were to hover, then which side would be facing the floor? I say neither, so it would rotate.
If you had a greater understanding of quantum physics then you would know that in fact both sides face the floor.
Martin J Wallace (Slaine)
-
Aug 24th, 2003, 10:23 AM
#14
Originally posted by Slaine
If you had a greater understanding of quantum physics then you would know that in fact both sides face the floor.
If you had a better understanding of the same, you'd realize that a cat is not a quantum particle. 
And since it's quantum indeterminance, it would in fact, not know that it has anything to do with quantum physics at all!
-
Aug 24th, 2003, 10:27 AM
#15
I am Einstein reincarnate.
-
Aug 24th, 2003, 10:38 AM
#16
Addicted Member
Surely it depends on how you strap the toast to the cat. If you used a wrought iron toast harness, then who knows what would land first. And also, there has been no mention of whether the toast would be attathced to the cat butter side up, or butter side down. Has the toast been removed from the toaster? If not, this too would make a difference. Is the toast made from brown bread or white? Has the cat got 4 legs or only 2?
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|