When is a search for "For Each" is going to work?

[Zealot]

It's not the first time I do a serch for the "For Each", but now it's time for a rant. Until when must I wait for you guys to do something about it?

[plenderj]

Well if you refer to the FAQ you'll see that you must rack up at least 4 rants before something is looked at by the admins.
So just three more to go



... just kidding by the way
I'll point it out to the admins.

[Zealot]

Thank you.

Besides would you really want me to 3 more times?

[Aaron Young]

Try searching on "*For Each*" without the quotes.

[Zealot]

I find it hard to believe that in all these years since the forum is alive the only times the cycle For Each has been talked about was in only 7 threads...

But thanks for the tip, it's better than nothing.
...but not enough.

[brad jones]

A search for "foreach" (without quotes) yeilds 75 threads or 106 posts. "*for each*" yields just a few.


Brad!

[Zealot]

That's nice Brad, but if you check many of those threads, you'll notice taht the users are either talking about C# or made the typo and wrote foreach without a space inbetween. But my problem is that the search function still doesn't detect VB code snipets with the For Each cycle.

[rlwhealdon]

Using For...Each generated 31 threads with 25 for General VBQuestions.