|
-
Apr 5th, 2003, 07:32 PM
#9
transcendental analytic
The relationship is more probable than is not transitive like greater than, which (to me) is counterintuitive.
I think its transitive. By definition the probability of the event X is n(X)/n(all events), a rational in other words, and rationals are transitive. I think we discussed this earlier too. Red, Yellow and Blue are not events, Red beating Blue, etc.. are. I can understand some people think its counterintuitive now even though I don't..
Agreed though is that "The probability of Red winning" is illdefined without knowing anything about the opponents.
Use  
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|
Reply With Quote