|
-
Feb 11th, 2003, 09:13 AM
#1
-
Feb 11th, 2003, 09:21 AM
#2
Well ...
I don't know for sure if it can be solved , but this is an inappropriate place for it. Post it in the Maths section 
.
-
Feb 11th, 2003, 09:27 AM
#3
WELL
There have been puzzles here before.
you're not going to go there and tell me to post it in chit chat, are you?
-
Feb 11th, 2003, 09:29 AM
#4
Laugh, and the world laughs with you. Cry, and you just water down your vodka.
Take credit, not responsibility
-
Feb 11th, 2003, 09:31 AM
#5
Fanatic Member
-
Feb 11th, 2003, 09:33 AM
#6
-
Feb 11th, 2003, 09:42 AM
#7
Retired VBF Adm1nistrator
The radius is five
Microsoft MVP : Visual Developer - Visual Basic [2004-2005]
-
Feb 11th, 2003, 09:43 AM
#8
Fanatic Member
*** show my work...
how do you think i did it?
its a math question.. i used ratios 
Seahag
-
Feb 11th, 2003, 09:46 AM
#9
Well ...
Originally posted by mendhak
WELL
There have been puzzles here before.
you're not going to go there and tell me to post it in chit chat, are you?
It is a maths puzzle, that's why *pouts*
.
-
Feb 11th, 2003, 09:55 PM
#10
PowerPoster
-We have enough youth. How about a fountain of "Smart"?
-If you can read this, thank a teacher....and since it's in English, thank a soldier.

-
Feb 12th, 2003, 01:32 AM
#11
Hyperactive Member
4*2^(1/2)
4 times the square root of 2
How?
The rectangle is 8 cm^2.
Each side of a square with the same area would have a length of the square root of 8, or 2*2^(1/2).
The lower-right corner of the small square with these dimensions would be directly on the circle (not inside or outside), and half-way between the top edge and the left edge of the circle.
Therefore, each side of the small square would be 1/4 the the length of each side of the big square, or 1/2 the radius of the circle.
2*2^(1/2) = 4*2^(1/2) = 4 times the square root of 2!
Is that right?
-
Feb 12th, 2003, 01:34 AM
#12
-
Feb 12th, 2003, 01:38 AM
#13
Hyperactive Member
Oh, yeh! Hmm. Your right, the lower-right edge of such a small square wouldn't be on the circle. It would be inside it.
Well, at least its the best try so far.
-
Feb 12th, 2003, 01:42 AM
#14
The only try so far.
-
Feb 12th, 2003, 05:42 AM
#15
An embarassing mistake...
I was calculating using 4cm and 8 cm :sheepish grin:
The answer is 10, but what is the method?
-
Feb 12th, 2003, 08:13 AM
#16
Hyperactive Member
Difficult to explain in words but :
1. Draw two radii (length R), one vertical and one horizontal to form a quadrant at the top left of the circle.
2. Drop a vertical line from the bottom right hand corner of the box to the horizontal radius.
3. Draw a horizontal line from the bottom right hand corner of the box to the vertical radius.
Let's call the height of the box X and the width of the box Y
Using Pythagoras
(R - X)^2 + (R - Y)^2 = R^2
Substituting the values for X and Y (2cm and 4cm respectively)
(R - 2)^2 + (R - 4)^2 = R^2
Expanding
R^2 - 2R + 4 - 2R + R^2 - 4R + 16 - 4R = R^2
Simplify
R^2 - 12R + 20 = 0
using x = -b +/- sqr(b^2 - 4ac)/2a
gives R= 10cm
Any prizes this time?
Last edited by Simon Caiger; Feb 12th, 2003 at 08:19 AM.
Simon Caiger
Documentation is like sex; when it's good, it's very, very good, and when it's bad, it's better than nothing.
-
Feb 12th, 2003, 08:19 AM
#17
Originally posted by Simon Caiger
Difficult to explain in words but :
1. Draw two radii (length R), one vertical and one horizontal to form a quadrant at the top left of the circle.
2. Drop a vertical line from the bottom right hand corner of the box to the horizontal radius.
3. Draw a horizontal line from the bottom right hand corner of the box to the vertical radius.
Let's call the height of the box X and the width of the box Y
Using Pythagoras
(R - X)2 + (R - Y)2 = R^2
Substituting the values for X and Y (2cm and 4cm respectively)
(R - 2)2 + (R - 4)2 = R^2
Expanding
R^2 - 2(2)R + 22 + 2R - 2(4)R + 42 = R^2
Simplify
R^2 - 12R + 20 = 0
using x = -b +/- sqr(b^2 - 4ac)/2a
gives R= 10cm
Any prizes this time?
Ladies and Gents, we have a wiener!
Your prize is a special McBrain Burger with a hot dog.
-
Feb 12th, 2003, 08:21 AM
#18
Fanatic Member
i had 10 damit..
heres my work
5 squares fix across the top.. so at
4*5/2 = 10
seems less complicated
-
Feb 12th, 2003, 08:22 AM
#19
Hyperactive Member
Simon Caiger
Documentation is like sex; when it's good, it's very, very good, and when it's bad, it's better than nothing.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|