Guv

Lets get something straight before I even bother with the rest of the post.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you are willing to open your eyes and come to this with an objective point of view (as opposed to the subjective point of view you are using) then perhaps we can discuss this properly.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The above is am example of one of many well known invalid arguments. "If you were objective, then ..." or "If you had an open mind, then...".
Incorrect.

I did not say nor even infer that this was the case. I stated your lack of objectiveness and narrow mindedness as a result of the only possible outcomes you listed as being ones in which YOU assume superior intelligence.

I merely pointed out that as you did not even consider for the slightest moment that you could be wrong that you were not willing to open your eyes.

No reference to "If you don't agree with me you are wrong"

Please READ what I write... instead of applying an old and outdated judgement of what you "think" I am doing.

Perhaps if you at least come to this understand I can continue... If however you cannot even understand this simple mistake then it means we are unable to communicate because no matter WHAT I say you will always ignore it and draw your own conclusions.