Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: c++.net

  1. Jan 3rd, 2003, 08:34 PM #1
    PT Exorcist
    PT Exorcist is offline

    Thread Starter
    yay gay PT Exorcist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    . . . my reason of shame
    Posts
    2,729

    c++.net

    i dont get it...what is the advantage?

    c++ is known for it speed...c++.net is a bit slower than c++6.

    c++ almost doesnt have runtimes..c++.net needs the framework

    c++ uses win libraries(i think)...then why use framework ones?


    hm.....what are the advantages of using c++.net?
    \m/\m/
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. Jan 4th, 2003, 05:01 AM #2
    kedaman
    kedaman is offline
    transcendental analytic kedaman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    0x002F2EA8
    Posts
    7,221
    c++ is a language, c++.net is a compiler/IDE for c++, and afaik the compiler that optimizes best so far. You don't have to use the framework.
    Use
    writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
    writing haskell makes your life easier:
    reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
    To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. Jan 4th, 2003, 05:36 AM #3
    Yonatan
    Yonatan is offline
    Guru Yonatan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 1999
    Location
    Israel
    Posts
    892

    If you are referring to Managed C++,

    then don't use it. It sux.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. Jan 4th, 2003, 09:26 AM #4
    PT Exorcist
    PT Exorcist is offline

    Thread Starter
    yay gay PT Exorcist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    . . . my reason of shame
    Posts
    2,729
    ahhh now i noticed that i can do unmanaged c++ programs...now is better
    \m/\m/
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. Jan 4th, 2003, 10:15 AM #5
    CornedBee
    CornedBee is offline
    Kitten CornedBee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    In a microchip!
    Posts
    11,594
    The point in Managed C++ is that they need some connection point between native code and .Net code (like the Java Native Interface for Java). Managed C++ is the solution, as you can mix native and MSIL code with it.
    All the buzzt
    CornedBee

    "Writing specifications is like writing a novel. Writing code is like writing poetry."
    - Anonymous, published by Raymond Chen

    Don't PM me with your problems, I scan most of the forums daily. If you do PM me, I will not answer your question.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. Jan 4th, 2003, 05:32 PM #6
    Yonatan
    Yonatan is offline
    Guru Yonatan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 1999
    Location
    Israel
    Posts
    892
    Originally posted by CornedBee
    Managed C++ is the solution, as you can mix native and MSIL code with it.
    Why would anyone want to do that in the first place?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. Jan 5th, 2003, 07:27 AM #7
    CornedBee
    CornedBee is offline
    Kitten CornedBee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    In a microchip!
    Posts
    11,594
    The writers of the frameswork would want to do it.
    People making some class libraries of their own accessible to .Net would want to do it.

    The "end users", the application programmers, wouldn't want to use it.
    All the buzzt
    CornedBee

    "Writing specifications is like writing a novel. Writing code is like writing poetry."
    - Anonymous, published by Raymond Chen

    Don't PM me with your problems, I scan most of the forums daily. If you do PM me, I will not answer your question.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules


Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width