|
-
Dec 13th, 2002, 10:36 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Member
Is C# a Good language to learn?
Is C# a good language to learn?
Tolkien is the greatest writer ever.
-
Dec 13th, 2002, 10:39 PM
#2
-
Dec 13th, 2002, 10:41 PM
#3
Thread Starter
Member
Tolkien is the greatest writer ever.
-
Dec 17th, 2002, 11:07 PM
#4
Fanatic Member
Re: Is C# a Good language to learn?
Originally posted by Zach Elfers
Is C# a good language to learn?
yeah, great language to learn. quite easy compare to Visual C++
-
Dec 18th, 2002, 10:48 PM
#5
Lively Member
Yes it is, you didn;t say what you were familiar with, but come from a very strong VB background, switching to VB.net was very easy because I while the prior VB never forced you to be Object oriented I always programed it that way, once you get the justs of OO well it just makes to much sense to do it any other way.
Anyway i am switching myself to C# because from what I have done with it so far has been impressive and I fell like I have a lot more control and options than i did in VB, plus the language is pretty strict which is also a good thing you produce better code because your forced to. I can still sit down and make something 3 times as fast in VB but I still force myself to do it in C#, I know the only reason i can do it faster is because i know the syntax and commands of VB very well. I will get faster in C#
The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources.
-- Albert Einstein
-
Dec 22nd, 2002, 02:17 PM
#6
You're quite bound to get a positive answer here, don't you think so?
All the buzzt
 CornedBee
"Writing specifications is like writing a novel. Writing code is like writing poetry."
- Anonymous, published by Raymond Chen
Don't PM me with your problems, I scan most of the forums daily. If you do PM me, I will not answer your question.
-
Dec 26th, 2002, 07:39 PM
#7
Hyperactive Member
C# is a great language to learn, especially if you choose it over VB. It will make C++ easier to learn later on.
But if you have slow computer, SharpDevelop runs like an arse !
-
Dec 27th, 2002, 05:58 AM
#8
That applies for the whole VS.NET. Don't use it unless you have at the absolute minimum 256MB RAM.
All the buzzt
 CornedBee
"Writing specifications is like writing a novel. Writing code is like writing poetry."
- Anonymous, published by Raymond Chen
Don't PM me with your problems, I scan most of the forums daily. If you do PM me, I will not answer your question.
-
Dec 28th, 2002, 06:50 PM
#9
New Member
Yeah, VS.NET is very heavy.
-
Dec 29th, 2002, 06:54 AM
#10
Guru
No. C# is a bad idea to learn.
You're quite bound to get a positive answer here, don't you think so?
No.
-
Dec 29th, 2002, 02:39 PM
#11
Not if people like you and me come around.
But what if we didn't?
All the buzzt
 CornedBee
"Writing specifications is like writing a novel. Writing code is like writing poetry."
- Anonymous, published by Raymond Chen
Don't PM me with your problems, I scan most of the forums daily. If you do PM me, I will not answer your question.
-
Dec 29th, 2002, 03:59 PM
#12
Guru
Then people would waste X years of their life learning C#, then discover how much it sux, and finally, spend (note the use of "spend" as opposed to "waste") some time learning C++.
Solve for X.
-
Dec 29th, 2002, 04:28 PM
#13
The only ray of light is that X(C#) is rather small.
All the buzzt
 CornedBee
"Writing specifications is like writing a novel. Writing code is like writing poetry."
- Anonymous, published by Raymond Chen
Don't PM me with your problems, I scan most of the forums daily. If you do PM me, I will not answer your question.
-
Dec 29th, 2002, 04:35 PM
#14
Guru
Not necessarily. It's still a waste either way though. Don't learn C#.
-
Dec 29th, 2002, 04:40 PM
#15
Yep. Learn C++. If you REALLY want to (or if you, like me, just have too much time on your hands) learn C# it's a hop of 20 minutes.
All the buzzt
 CornedBee
"Writing specifications is like writing a novel. Writing code is like writing poetry."
- Anonymous, published by Raymond Chen
Don't PM me with your problems, I scan most of the forums daily. If you do PM me, I will not answer your question.
-
Dec 29th, 2002, 05:10 PM
#16
Guru
Or if you, like me, can forsee the future destruction and mayhem caused by .NET, avoid C#. (I'm proud to say I don't know it.)
-
Dec 29th, 2002, 07:32 PM
#17
PowerPoster
Or if you, like me, can forsee the future destruction and mayhem caused by .NET, avoid C#. (I'm proud to say I don't know it.)
Yonatan,
Did Microsoft turn you down on a job opening or something??
Or if you, like me, can forsee the future increase in yearly household income caused by .NET, embrace C#. (I'm proud to say I know it.)
-
Dec 29th, 2002, 07:44 PM
#18
Hyperactive Member
Originally posted by BOUND4DOOM
Yes it is, you didn;t say what you were familiar with, but come from a very strong VB background, switching to VB.net was very easy because I while the prior VB never forced you to be Object oriented I always programed it that way, once you get the justs of OO well it just makes to much sense to do it any other way.
Anyway i am switching myself to C# because from what I have done with it so far has been impressive and I fell like I have a lot more control and options than i did in VB, plus the language is pretty strict which is also a good thing you produce better code because your forced to. I can still sit down and make something 3 times as fast in VB but I still force myself to do it in C#, I know the only reason i can do it faster is because i know the syntax and commands of VB very well. I will get faster in C#
I dont think C# offers much that VB.NET doesnt have (yet). After All, they both come from the framework. C Style Syntax syntax r0x0rz though!
-
Dec 30th, 2002, 09:53 AM
#19
Guru
Originally posted by Lethal
Yonatan,
Did Microsoft turn you down on a job opening or something??
No, I doubt Microsoft would hire me anyway (due to my age.)
Or if you, like me, can forsee the future increase in yearly household income caused by .NET, embrace C#. (I'm proud to say I know it.)
I don't know, I can foresee* an extreme future decrease. But I'm the only one who thinks so.
-
Jan 4th, 2003, 03:53 PM
#20
Hyperactive Member
-
Jan 4th, 2003, 05:37 PM
#21
-
Jan 4th, 2003, 06:26 PM
#22
Hyperactive Member
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|