|
-
Sep 26th, 2000, 05:48 PM
#11
Thread Starter
Hyperactive Member
So you would agree that the determination of what is "random" depends on whether your analysis can find a pattern?
So why then would anybody think ANYTHING is random when we are only just scratching the surface of how anything works?
Guv stated Radioactive Decay... obviously people have looked at it and are unable to find a pattern... That doesn't in itself make it random... it means we haven't found a pattern and thus CALL it random.
Why is this such a hard concept for you people to grasp? Science is supposed to learn from itself, correct its mistakes... not have people like this STICK to a concept because it fits their lovely little view of a universe that has randomness in it.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|