to include or not to include

[nabeels786]

Hello all,

I'm currently using a Dreamweaver template for my site, so the header is about 50 lines, and the footer about 50 too.

I was wondering, is it better (ie, uses less bandwidth) to include the header/footer in instead of have the html code repeat each time?

I know it makes it more readable, but other than that, is there an advantage?

<my header code>
...
<my php code>
...
<my footer code>


///or

include("path/to/header");
<my php code>
include("path/to/footer"); 

Thanks

[The Hobo]

I'd throw my vote to use include. It's just much easier on you. It doesn't use any more bandwidth, but it could slow load time down. Yet, even on dialup, it'd probably not be noticable.

I've never had a problem doing it.

[da_silvy]

it's just another file the server has to get

also, it means you change 1 file for changes to your header and footer, instead of many

[nabeels786]

I decided not to use it, like da_silvy said, its another file the server has to process. Updating templates isn't a problem, since I won't be changing the design. Besides, Dreamweaver automatically updates all the sites's pages if you change the template

[dpendley]

If the header and footer are the same for ever page then i would stick them in a js and include them from there.