|
-
Nov 26th, 2002, 09:44 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Stuck in the 80s
[Resolved] Sum Identity
I have a project problem that reads:
Show how to derive the sin(2x) from the sum identity using sin(x + x).
Sounds easy. But I can't find anything about the sum identity in my book. Can anyone enlighten me?
Last edited by The Hobo; Nov 26th, 2002 at 10:54 PM.
-
Nov 26th, 2002, 10:11 PM
#2
Thread Starter
Stuck in the 80s
Okay. I fooled around with this:
sin(x + x) = sin(x)cos(x) + cos(x)sin(x) = 2sin(x)cos(x)
Where do I go from there? Am I going the wrong way?
-
Nov 26th, 2002, 10:26 PM
#3
PowerPoster
Christ it's been awhile since I did these ones...
-----------------------------------------
-RJ
[email protected]
-----------------------------------------
-
Nov 26th, 2002, 10:27 PM
#4
PowerPoster
Do you have all the rules anywhere?
-----------------------------------------
-RJ
[email protected]
-----------------------------------------
-
Nov 26th, 2002, 10:32 PM
#5
Thread Starter
Stuck in the 80s
Originally posted by rjlohan
Do you have all the rules anywhere?
The rules? *scans his book* No one told me about rules? 
I have a crap-load of formulas I keep trying, but I'm not getting anywhere.
I don't want an answer here. Just a clue to get me from A to B.
-
Nov 26th, 2002, 10:38 PM
#6
PowerPoster
The clue is that you need the basic identities first.
e.g - sin(x + y) = sin(x)cos(y) + sin(y)cos(x)
-----------------------------------------
-RJ
[email protected]
-----------------------------------------
-
Nov 26th, 2002, 10:43 PM
#7
Thread Starter
Stuck in the 80s
Bah! I got that.
I'm here: 2sin(x)cos(x)
How can I make that eqal to sin(2x)?
When you substitute x for 45, they come out as equal, but that's too big of a jump. How can I prove those two are equal without pluging in a value?
Is there some identity I'm not seeing?
-
Nov 26th, 2002, 10:49 PM
#8
Thread Starter
Stuck in the 80s
fook me!
The Double-Angle Formula states that:
I already have it solved.
I can't believe I just wasted an hour on that when it's already a pre-established identity.
Thanks for your help, rj.
-
Nov 28th, 2002, 04:53 PM
#9
Addicted Member
An hour?!?! Why would it take an hour? You should already know that sin(x+y)=sinxcosy+cosxsiny, and if you didnt you could refer to your book. Then it takes two seconds after that to say sin(x + x) = sin(x)cos(x) + cos(x)sin(x) = 2sin(x)cos(x)= sin(2x)
YL says:"Few are those who see with their own eyes and feel with their own hearts."(Einstein)
-
Nov 28th, 2002, 05:23 PM
#10
Thread Starter
Stuck in the 80s
Originally posted by SilverSprite
An hour?!?! Why would it take an hour? You should already know that sin(x+y)=sinxcosy+cosxsiny, and if you didnt you could refer to your book. Then it takes two seconds after that to say sin(x + x) = sin(x)cos(x) + cos(x)sin(x) = 2sin(x)cos(x)= sin(2x)
Why should I already know that? Because you do? And I already mentioned that I didn't see it in the book.
Way to be an ass, though.
-
Nov 28th, 2002, 06:01 PM
#11
Fanatic Member
SilverSprite screwed up on a math contest so he isn't in a very good mood. Let me apologize for him.
Massey RuleZ! ^-^__  Cheers!  __^-^ Massey RuleZ!
Did you know that...
The probability that a random rational number has an even denominator is 1/3 (Salamin and Gosper 1972)? This result is independently verified by me (2002)!
-
Nov 28th, 2002, 07:41 PM
#12
Addicted Member
Yes, i guess i should apologize too. I CANT BELIEVE 9+5=11!!!! And what's even more stupid is a misadded so many times.
YL says:"Few are those who see with their own eyes and feel with their own hearts."(Einstein)
-
Nov 29th, 2002, 04:38 PM
#13
Addicted Member
He's not the only one who screwed up...
891>976
!!! !!!
-
Nov 29th, 2002, 04:42 PM
#14
Addicted Member
Kalk how can you make such an amateur mistake!
YL says:"Few are those who see with their own eyes and feel with their own hearts."(Einstein)
-
Nov 29th, 2002, 05:20 PM
#15
Fanatic Member
try (6a)/(3a)=3! (not 3 factorial, just 3 with an exclaimation mark)
Massey RuleZ! ^-^__  Cheers!  __^-^ Massey RuleZ!
Did you know that...
The probability that a random rational number has an even denominator is 1/3 (Salamin and Gosper 1972)? This result is independently verified by me (2002)!
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|