|
-
Nov 19th, 2002, 06:49 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Addicted Member
Erdos-Anning Theorem
Can anyone explain this theorem??? It doesn't seem to make sense:
If an infinite number of points in the plane are all separated by integer distances, then all the points lie on a straight line.
-
Nov 20th, 2002, 03:08 AM
#2
-
Nov 22nd, 2002, 10:45 PM
#3
Thread Starter
Addicted Member
But if you consider all the lattice points (points with integer coordinates), they are all separated by integer distances, and they certainly don't all lie on one line.
-
Nov 22nd, 2002, 11:25 PM
#4
Fanatic Member
are you sure Kalkewl8ter? tell me whats's the distance between (0,0) and (1,1)?
Massey RuleZ! ^-^__  Cheers!  __^-^ Massey RuleZ!
Did you know that...
The probability that a random rational number has an even denominator is 1/3 (Salamin and Gosper 1972)? This result is independently verified by me (2002)!
-
Nov 23rd, 2002, 02:33 PM
#5
Addicted Member
ooo i think that he has got you there kalkewl8ter.
YL says:"Few are those who see with their own eyes and feel with their own hearts."(Einstein)
-
Nov 26th, 2002, 05:21 PM
#6
Thread Starter
Addicted Member
You stay out of this, Sprite! Ok, bugz, you're right...sqrt(2) usually isn't considered an integer...that makes more sense now. Thx bugz and sql_lall!
-
Nov 26th, 2002, 08:21 PM
#7
Addicted Member
No thank you for little ol me :'( you hurt my feelings!
YL says:"Few are those who see with their own eyes and feel with their own hearts."(Einstein)
-
Nov 29th, 2002, 09:28 PM
#8
Thread Starter
Addicted Member
Fine...I'll thank you too Sprite (who knows what for), just to make you happy.
-
Dec 27th, 2002, 01:52 PM
#9
Fanatic Member
In article <[email protected]>,
Yaniv Shpilberg <[email protected]> wrote:
>The problem:
>Given: infinitely many points on a plane such that the distance between any
>two points is a whole number.
>To prove or disprove: all those points ore on the same straight line.
>
Proof:
Suppose you have three points A, B and C with integer distances between
them and not all on the same line. If d(A,Q) (=distance from A to Q)
and d(B,Q) are both integers, note that d(A,Q) - d(B,Q) is one of the
integers from -d(A,B) to d(A,B). Now for any given k, the points Q
with d(A,Q) - d(B,Q) = k lie on a branch of a hyperbola (or its degenerate
cases, a straight line parallel or perpendicular to AB). Every point of
your set is an intersection of one of these curves, and one of the
analogous curves for A and C, and one of the curves for B and C. But
any two of the curves intersect in only a finite number of points.
Therefore there are only a finite number of points with integer distances
from A, B and C.
--
Robert Israel [email protected]
Department of Mathematics (604) 822-3629
University of British Columbia fax 822-6074
Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Y4
Massey RuleZ! ^-^__  Cheers!  __^-^ Massey RuleZ!
Did you know that...
The probability that a random rational number has an even denominator is 1/3 (Salamin and Gosper 1972)? This result is independently verified by me (2002)!
-
Dec 28th, 2002, 07:37 AM
#10
Originally posted by bugzpodder
>The problem:
>Given: infinitely many points on a plane such that the distance between any
>two points is a whole number.
>To prove or disprove: all those points are on the same straight line.
>
Proof:
Suppose you have three points A, B and C with integer distances between
them and not all on the same line................................................................................................ ...............
Therefore there are only a finite number of points with integer distances
from A, B and C.
The "Therefore" is not that which was meant to be proven!
-
Dec 28th, 2002, 09:31 AM
#11
Fanatic Member
he assumed that some of the points are NOT on the straight line, then then proved that the number of points are finite. although i agree that he didn't exactly prove that if they are on a straight line, there could be infinitely many points.
Massey RuleZ! ^-^__  Cheers!  __^-^ Massey RuleZ!
Did you know that...
The probability that a random rational number has an even denominator is 1/3 (Salamin and Gosper 1972)? This result is independently verified by me (2002)!
-
Dec 29th, 2002, 10:47 PM
#12
Thread Starter
Addicted Member
-
Dec 29th, 2002, 10:55 PM
#13
Fanatic Member
a degenerated polygon is a polygon with no area (or maybe at least one degree less). if it has no area then its vertices are probably on a line
Massey RuleZ! ^-^__  Cheers!  __^-^ Massey RuleZ!
Did you know that...
The probability that a random rational number has an even denominator is 1/3 (Salamin and Gosper 1972)? This result is independently verified by me (2002)!
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|