|
-
Nov 10th, 2002, 07:36 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Addicted Member
file sharing in XP
Hi all - I hope somebody can help!!
I recently found that there is a limit to the amount of users when cusing file sharing. Does anybody know of a hack or a way around this???
Thanks in advance.
-
Nov 10th, 2002, 02:19 PM
#2
Not NoteMe
Out of curiosity, what's the limit?
Quotes:
"I am getting better then you guys.." NoteMe, on his leet english skills.
"And I am going to meat her again later on tonight." NoteMe
"I think you should change your name to QuoteMe" Shaggy Hiker, regarding NoteMe
"my sweet lord jesus. I've decided never to have breast implants" Tom Gibbons
Have I helped you? Please Rate my posts. 
-
Nov 10th, 2002, 02:30 PM
#3
Thread Starter
Addicted Member
FYI - The limit with XP Home is 5 Concurrent Connections.
No other ideas I presume???
-
Nov 11th, 2002, 04:21 AM
#4
Not NoteMe
Wow, that's a bit low - i'd have thought it'd be much higher.
Sorry i have no idea how you could resolve the problem.
Quotes:
"I am getting better then you guys.." NoteMe, on his leet english skills.
"And I am going to meat her again later on tonight." NoteMe
"I think you should change your name to QuoteMe" Shaggy Hiker, regarding NoteMe
"my sweet lord jesus. I've decided never to have breast implants" Tom Gibbons
Have I helped you? Please Rate my posts. 
-
Nov 11th, 2002, 08:16 PM
#5
Black Cat
Microsoft has always tried to make you upgrade to a "Server" OS if you want to have more than ten connections.
Josh
Get these: Mozilla Opera OpenBSD
I have books for sale: "MCSD in a Nutshell" and "VB Distributed Exam Cram" - PM me for details. Will also trade for a decent ATX Pentium 2 MB/CPU/RAM combo.
-
Nov 11th, 2002, 09:02 PM
#6
Thread Starter
Addicted Member
But is there any kind of a registry hack or otherwise that would overcome this problem???
-
Nov 11th, 2002, 09:14 PM
#7
Fanatic Member
Originally posted by PaulTilley
But is there any kind of a registry hack or otherwise that would overcome this problem???
they don't usually make it that easy...
-C
-
Nov 12th, 2002, 01:19 AM
#8
I would assume that xp pro doesnt have a limitation THIS LOW! I dont think you could crack it. It's usually the way Josh said..... different versions of their OS handles different number of connections, whether it's for telnet or whatever....
Btw did you read that somewhere or are you just experimenting it?
rate my posts if they help ya!
Extract thumbnail without reading the whole image file: (C# - VB)
Apply texture to bitmaps: (C# - VB)
Extended console library: (VB)
Save JPEG with a certain quality (image compression): (C# - VB )
VB.NET to C# conversion tips!!
-
Nov 12th, 2002, 10:56 AM
#9
Black Cat
Originally posted by MrPolite
I would assume that xp pro doesnt have a limitation THIS LOW! I dont think you could crack it. It's usually the way Josh said..... different versions of their OS handles different number of connections, whether it's for telnet or whatever....
Btw did you read that somewhere or are you just experimenting it?
AFAIK, all non-Server version of NT or higher limit Windows File Sharing, etc, and IIS/PWS to a ten connection limit. Normal TCP/IP connections should not be affected, only MS supplied software, but if memory serves me right, MS had tried to limit the original NT OS to ten connections for any TCP/IP connections, but they were criticized for trying to ship a non-standard and broken TCP/IP stack. (NT's TCP/IP is actually based on Berkeley BSD's).
Anyway, here's an experiment to try. Disabled the Windows File Sharing, etc. Then install a Unix emulation environment (POSIX/cygwin, etc). Then see if you can get Samba to run on that, and see if that can get around the limitations.
Josh
Get these: Mozilla Opera OpenBSD
I have books for sale: "MCSD in a Nutshell" and "VB Distributed Exam Cram" - PM me for details. Will also trade for a decent ATX Pentium 2 MB/CPU/RAM combo.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|