|
-
Sep 19th, 2002, 09:44 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Fanatic Member
could there be a combination?
2(2^2)
3(3^3)
4(4^4)
.....
a(a^a)
What I have found, but not yet proven, I think is that in case of a = 3.
3(3^3) = 81. But we can see it this way:
(3*3)^3-1, also 81. But this notion doesn't work with a=2, or 4 or any other number I haven't test it yet.

prog_tom
JOIN THE REVOLUTION!!!! Dual T3 backedup science community.
http://physics.sviesoft.com/forum
-
Sep 20th, 2002, 01:39 AM
#2
Retired VBF Adm1nistrator
What exactly are you asking ?
Microsoft MVP : Visual Developer - Visual Basic [2004-2005]
-
Sep 20th, 2002, 08:05 AM
#3
Fanatic Member
I think there is a combination,
and the combination of drugs Prog_Tom has been taken,
should be written down and given to me.
I bet it's a nice place.
-
Sep 20th, 2002, 08:07 AM
#4
Retired VBF Adm1nistrator
Originally posted by JPicasso
I think there is a combination,
and the combination of drugs Prog_Tom has been taken,
should be written down and given to me.
I bet it's a nice place.
lol
Microsoft MVP : Visual Developer - Visual Basic [2004-2005]
-
Sep 22nd, 2002, 04:10 PM
#5
Frenzied Member
a*aa = aa+1
The above should provide some insight.
Live long & prosper.
The Dinosaur from prehistoric era prior to computers.
Eschew obfuscation!
If a billion people believe a foolish idea, it is still a foolish idea!
VB.net 2010 Express
64Bit & 32Bit Windows 7 & Windows XP. I run 4 operating systems on a single PC.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|