|
-
Sep 14th, 2002, 12:18 AM
#1
*resolved* Are DLLs efficient?
Let's say I have a project with 5 classes. If I make a DLL out of each of those classes and replace the classes with the DLL versions, would it be any slower?
in another words is there any difference in speed when using a dll file or a .vb file?
Last edited by MrPolite; Sep 14th, 2002 at 07:29 PM.
rate my posts if they help ya!
Extract thumbnail without reading the whole image file: (C# - VB)
Apply texture to bitmaps: (C# - VB)
Extended console library: (VB)
Save JPEG with a certain quality (image compression): (C# - VB )
VB.NET to C# conversion tips!!
-
Sep 14th, 2002, 12:29 AM
#2
Hyperactive Member
No Difference.
THe only thing you can do different is that you can code all the DLLS in other .NET languages so you can use a C# DLL in a vb.net project. You cant use a C sharp class csharp.cs in a vb project.
William T
Software Architect / Chief Software Developer
Softwaremaker.Net Pte Ltd
http://www.Softwaremaker.net
*** Things are always the darkest before they go pitch black ***
-
Sep 14th, 2002, 12:31 AM
#3

another thing:
let's say I have 2 classes with the exact same functionality, one written in C# one in VB.NET. And let's assume they have the same performance
if I create a DLL of the C# class, would the vb.net class be any faster than the C# dll when using in a vb.net project?
rate my posts if they help ya!
Extract thumbnail without reading the whole image file: (C# - VB)
Apply texture to bitmaps: (C# - VB)
Extended console library: (VB)
Save JPEG with a certain quality (image compression): (C# - VB )
VB.NET to C# conversion tips!!
-
Sep 14th, 2002, 03:16 AM
#4
Hyperactive Member
They are the same.
All .NET languages are of the same level of citizenship in .NET Platform country.
They ALL compiled to Microsoft Intermediate Language (MSIL) which is then JIT Compiled to native machine code to be executed.
William T
Software Architect / Chief Software Developer
Softwaremaker.Net Pte Ltd
http://www.Softwaremaker.net
*** Things are always the darkest before they go pitch black ***
-
Sep 14th, 2002, 10:22 AM
#5
PowerPoster
Just to add, no there would be no difference. (unless one is optimized better in code, but you said equal)
-
Sep 14th, 2002, 02:36 PM
#6
-
Sep 14th, 2002, 05:56 PM
#7
Unlike VB6 I think .NET doesn't load the whole dll in and only loads the parts it needs when it does. Although I'm not sure on that.
-
Sep 14th, 2002, 06:48 PM
#8
Hyperactive Member
Edneeis is right.
There is no difference.
William T
Software Architect / Chief Software Developer
Softwaremaker.Net Pte Ltd
http://www.Softwaremaker.net
*** Things are always the darkest before they go pitch black ***
-
Sep 14th, 2002, 07:28 PM
#9
thank you !!!
rate my posts if they help ya!
Extract thumbnail without reading the whole image file: (C# - VB)
Apply texture to bitmaps: (C# - VB)
Extended console library: (VB)
Save JPEG with a certain quality (image compression): (C# - VB )
VB.NET to C# conversion tips!!
-
Dec 17th, 2002, 04:18 PM
#10
yay gay
oh really nice...was looking for info about ths..but...loading a dll shouldn't slow up everything?
\m/  \m/
-
Dec 17th, 2002, 06:55 PM
#11
Originally posted by PT Exorcist
oh really nice...was looking for info about ths..but...loading a dll shouldn't slow up everything?
ahem ahem, they said "no"
rate my posts if they help ya!
Extract thumbnail without reading the whole image file: (C# - VB)
Apply texture to bitmaps: (C# - VB)
Extended console library: (VB)
Save JPEG with a certain quality (image compression): (C# - VB )
VB.NET to C# conversion tips!!
-
Dec 18th, 2002, 03:17 AM
#12
yay gay
yea i know but i think it's strange...lol
\m/  \m/
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|