View Poll Results: Who has got the best CPUs?
- Voters
- 17. You may not vote on this poll
-
Jun 14th, 2002, 03:32 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Lively Member
-
Jun 14th, 2002, 03:40 AM
#2
New Member
-
Jun 14th, 2002, 03:50 AM
#3
New Member
**** You!!
You know...Intel you may not have...
Buy AMD, `cus I`ve got it...
-
Jun 14th, 2002, 04:04 AM
#4
PowerPoster
doesn't really matter. Some people will explain to you how the circuits are different, and this brand is better than that brand, etc. In the real world, they both work and you'll never notice a difference.
All else being equal, buy whichever is a better deal.
-
Jun 14th, 2002, 07:25 AM
#5
Hyperactive Member
Have a Pentium 4 1.7 at work and an Athalon 1.4 at home. It may just be perception, but their seems to be no difference between the two performance wise (despite the Intel having a gig of ram and the Athalon a mere 512mb). So given that the 1.4 athalon is cheaper than the 1.7 Intel, I'd go Athalon again.
SD
"I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me than a full frontal lobotomy!"
-
Jun 14th, 2002, 07:27 AM
#6
Fanatic Member
Intel now has the fastest chips out, but price vs performance, AMD wins every time.
-
Jun 14th, 2002, 07:41 AM
#7
Lively Member
I notice a difference between 1.4 amd tbird and a petium4 1.4
Amd is just made better and has a faster clock speed.
I program in: vb6,vb.net,html,c++,java/script
-
Jun 14th, 2002, 07:50 AM
#8
Fanatic Member
I think you should concentrate more on things that really matter like
the color of your computer case.
Where's that custom case link when you need it?
Last edited by JPicasso; Jun 14th, 2002 at 08:25 AM.
Merry Christmas
-
Jun 15th, 2002, 06:38 AM
#9
Thread Starter
Lively Member
-It seems like it`s gonna be a Athlon...
-Thanks!
-
Jun 15th, 2002, 06:58 AM
#10
Member
Well buy an Intel because AMD is er.. cheaper and faster and.. oh well, buy AMD
-
Jun 15th, 2002, 07:18 AM
#11
Monday Morning Lunatic
There's no doubt that Intel are way ahead in the performance stakes, but you pay a very high price for it.
I'd choose AMD - they're about half the price and more efficient (less clock cycles for certain instructions which mitigates a lot of the raw clock speed issues).
I refuse to tie my hands behind my back and hear somebody say "Bend Over, Boy, Because You Have It Coming To You".
-- Linus Torvalds
-
Jun 15th, 2002, 07:20 AM
#12
PowerPoster
Get some solder and make your own.
-
Jun 15th, 2002, 07:34 AM
#13
There's no doubt that Intel are way ahead in the performance stakes, but you pay a very high price for it.
That's the way life is unfortunately
when you quote a post could you please do it via the "Reply With Quote" button or if it multiple post click the "''+" button then "Reply With Quote" button.
If this thread is finished with please mark it "Resolved" by selecting "Mark thread resolved" from the "Thread tools" drop-down menu.
https://get.cryptobrowser.site/30/4111672
-
Jun 15th, 2002, 08:40 AM
#14
Frenzied Member
AMD. Simply put...an XP1700+ spanks a P4 2.0 so why pay for performance you won't see?
I'm bringing geeky back...
-
Jun 15th, 2002, 08:44 AM
#15
PowerPoster
A decent blank circuit board is only a couple bucks and so is a spool of solder.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|