server sucks

**Jim Davis** · Jun 4th, 2002, 06:08 PM

[QUOTE]

Pinging www.vbforums.com (161.58.186.97) with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=151ms TTL=243
Request timed out.
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=150ms TTL=243
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=150ms TTL=243
Request timed out.
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=141ms TTL=243
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=140ms TTL=243
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=140ms TTL=243
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=140ms TTL=243
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=140ms TTL=243
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=160ms TTL=243
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=140ms TTL=243
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=151ms TTL=243
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=150ms TTL=243
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=141ms TTL=243
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=140ms TTL=243
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=140ms TTL=243
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=140ms TTL=243
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=140ms TTL=243
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=140ms TTL=243

Ping statistics for 161.58.186.97:
Packets: Sent = 28, Received = 18, Lost = 10 (35% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 140ms, Maximum = 160ms, Average = 92ms

[/QOUTE]

just fix your server guys, its very crap...

Regards,
Jim.

**Jim Davis** · Jun 4th, 2002, 06:10 PM

well.. it looks like the qoute not works yet..

**NotLKH** · Jun 4th, 2002, 07:21 PM

Originally posted by Jim Davis

[/QOUTE]

Next time, try [/QUOTE]

**John** · Jun 4th, 2002, 08:23 PM

And blame the network not the server. Could you do a tracert next time, so that we can get some idea of where the problem is?

Thanks,
John

**plenderj** · Jun 5th, 2002, 04:25 AM

Originally posted by John
And blame the network not the server. Could you do a tracert next time, so that we can get some idea of where the problem is?

Thanks,
John

Well I find it quite difficult to use the forums at times.
Happened earlier this morning.
Anyway, right now its working fine, and here is my own trace.

I'll try another trace when it won't work for me

Code:


Tracing route to www.vbforums.com [161.58.186.97]

over a maximum of 30 hops:



  1     *        *        *     Request timed out.
  2     *       30 ms    40 ms  ts14.dublin.indigo.ie [194.125.145.174] 
  3    30 ms    40 ms    40 ms  fe1-0.tr1.cra.dublin.eircom.net [194.125.145.107] 
  4   110 ms   131 ms   100 ms  fa0-0-0.core1.cra.dublin.eircom.net [159.134.191.65] 
  5    70 ms    50 ms   121 ms  pos5-0-0.core2.adl.dublin.eircom.net [159.134.192.246] 
  6    50 ms    50 ms   100 ms  pos1-0-0.core1.the.london.eircom.net [159.134.191.102] 
  7   100 ms    50 ms    60 ms  ge-1.linx.londen02.uk.bb.verio.net [195.66.225.138] 
  8    40 ms    50 ms    50 ms  p4-0-1-0.r00.londen02.uk.bb.verio.net [129.250.4.33] 
  9    51 ms    60 ms    50 ms  p4-1-1-0.r00.amstnl02.nl.bb.verio.net [129.250.2.51] 
 10    51 ms    60 ms    50 ms  p4-0-3-0.r01.amstnl02.nl.bb.verio.net [129.250.2.133] 
 11   141 ms   150 ms   140 ms  p4-0-1-0.r80.nwrknj01.us.bb.verio.net [129.250.2.222] 
 12   140 ms   150 ms   140 ms  p4-1-3-0.r01.nwrknj01.us.bb.verio.net [129.250.5.41] 
 13   140 ms   150 ms   150 ms  p4-0-1.r01.phlapa01.us.bb.verio.net [129.250.3.125] 
 14   140 ms   150 ms   151 ms  p4-1-0-0.r00.phlapa01.us.bb.verio.net [129.250.3.153] 
 15   211 ms   150 ms   160 ms  p4-6-0-0.r00.stngva01.us.bb.verio.net [129.250.3.105] 
 16   170 ms   171 ms   270 ms  ge-4-1.c00.stngva01.us.ah.vwh.net [129.250.27.184] 
 17   251 ms   160 ms   150 ms  161.58.156.173 
 18   170 ms   360 ms   241 ms  vbforums.com [161.58.186.97] 

Trace complete.

**filburt1** · Jun 5th, 2002, 08:50 AM

Actually the server is awesome here:

Code:

C:\>ping -n 15 vbforums.com

Pinging vbforums.com [161.58.186.97] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=244
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=244
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=244
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=244
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=244
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=244
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=244
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=244
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=244
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=244
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=244
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=244
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=244
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=244
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=244

Ping statistics for 161.58.186.97:
    Packets: Sent = 15, Received = 15, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum =  0ms, Average =  0ms

C:\>tracert vbforums.com

Tracing route to vbforums.com [161.58.186.97]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1   <10 ms   <10 ms   <10 ms  vlan230-csr1.gsfc.nasa.gov [128.183.216.1]
  2   <10 ms   <10 ms   <10 ms  gsfc-fw1.gsfc.nasa.gov [128.183.238.1]
  3   <10 ms   <10 ms   <10 ms  wan2-fw.gsfc.nasa.gov [198.119.58.2]
  4   <10 ms   <10 ms   <10 ms  rtr-internet-ef.gsfc.nasa.gov [192.43.240.36]
  5   <10 ms   <10 ms   <10 ms  128.161.3.12
  6   <10 ms   <10 ms    16 ms  192.84.8.66
  7   <10 ms   <10 ms    16 ms  p4-4-0-0.r02.mclnva02.us.bb.verio.net [129.250.5.250]
  8   <10 ms   <10 ms    15 ms  p16-7-0-0.r02.stngva01.us.bb.verio.net [129.250.5.46]
  9   <10 ms   <10 ms    16 ms  ge-3-1.c00.stngva01.us.ah.vwh.net [129.250.27.216]
 10   <10 ms   <10 ms    15 ms  161.58.156.173
 11   <10 ms   <10 ms   <10 ms  vbforums.com [161.58.186.97]

Trace complete.

**Martin Wilson** · Jun 5th, 2002, 02:01 PM

And one more:

C:\>ping -n 15 vbforums.com

Pinging vbforums.com [161.58.186.97] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=260ms TTL=243
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=251ms TTL=243
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=270ms TTL=243
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=261ms TTL=243
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=260ms TTL=243
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=260ms TTL=243
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=250ms TTL=243
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=230ms TTL=243
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=241ms TTL=243
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=230ms TTL=243
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=241ms TTL=243
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=230ms TTL=243
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=221ms TTL=243
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=220ms TTL=243
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=240ms TTL=243

Ping statistics for 161.58.186.97:
Packets: Sent = 15, Received = 15, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 220ms, Maximum = 270ms, Average = 244ms

C:\>tracert vbforums.com

Tracing route to vbforums.com [161.58.186.97]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 180 ms 160 ms 120 ms snake.lns.birmingham.access.planet.net.uk [195.92.168.32]
2 110 ms 801 ms 120 ms PBR-1.BRM.AS5388.NET [195.92.168.2]
3 120 ms 110 ms 120 ms ge-0.linx.londen02.uk.bb.verio.net [195.66.224.138]
4 110 ms 120 ms 120 ms p4-2-0-0.r01.londen02.uk.bb.verio.net [129.250.2.81]
5 240 ms 241 ms 240 ms p4-1-0-0.r80.nycmny01.us.bb.verio.net [129.250.4.181]
6 190 ms 190 ms 190 ms p16-0-1-3.r21.nycmny01.us.bb.verio.net [129.250.2.170]
7 200 ms 201 ms 200 ms p16-5-0-0.r02.asbnva01.us.bb.verio.net [129.250.5.99]
8 201 ms 200 ms 200 ms p16-7-0-0.r01.asbnva01.us.bb.verio.net [129.250.5.20]
9 240 ms 200 ms 191 ms p16-3-0-0.r00.stngva01.us.bb.verio.net [129.250.2.74]
10 271 ms 220 ms 220 ms ge-4-1.c00.stngva01.us.ah.vwh.net [129.250.27.184]
11 270 ms 261 ms 260 ms 161.58.156.173
12 190 ms 201 ms 190 ms vbforums.com [161.58.186.97]

Trace complete.

**John** · Jun 5th, 2002, 06:02 PM

plenderj, that looks like a problem with your ISP to me.

And of course we run Linux, don't want PHP/MySQL on Windows!?!

**filburt1** · Jun 5th, 2002, 06:55 PM

Still weird though John, the board does seem extremely slow for several minute intervals for no reason. Then again vB's support forums do that too every now and then too but these get a lot more traffic.

**plenderj** · Jun 6th, 2002, 05:50 AM

Originally posted by John
plenderj, that looks like a problem with your ISP to me.

And of course we run Linux, don't want PHP/MySQL on Windows!?!

Ah well doesn't bother me

And don't you think thats a little ... well ... I'm not sure of a proper adjective, but running a site about windows programming on a linux server.
Just seems odd

Also, why not use proper SQL Server on a windows server ?
It'd kick mySQL's ass!

**filburt1** · Jun 6th, 2002, 06:51 AM

vB hasn't been ported to work with SQL Server, only MySQL, and they say that they have no intentions to change.

**plenderj** · Jun 6th, 2002, 06:59 AM

Originally posted by filburt1
vB hasn't been ported to work with SQL Server, only MySQL, and they say that they have no intentions to change.

Piece of crap freeware bull****...

Ya buy the kit and the software off me, and then look here :
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/tre...vg/Miglamp.asp

See?
Problem solved!

**filburt1** · Jun 6th, 2002, 08:23 AM

For some reason I doubt that John and the devs would port the several thousand lines of PHP code to use SQL Server rather than MySQL just because somebody thinks it's crap. The main reasons it uses MySQL in the first place is because (1) it's really fast, (2) it's free, and (3) most hosts who offer PHP offer only MySQL because of (1) and (2).

**plenderj** · Jun 6th, 2002, 08:28 AM

Originally posted by John
plenderj, that looks like a problem with your ISP to me.

And of course we run Linux, don't want PHP/MySQL on Windows!?!

btw here is an alternate route i just got :

Code:

Tracing route to www.vbforums.com [161.58.186.97]

over a maximum of 30 hops:


  1     *        *        *     Request timed out.
  2   641 ms   961 ms  1282 ms  194.125.145.176 
  3     *        *     1762 ms  fa2-0.tr2.cra.dublin.eircom.net [194.125.145.126] 
  4    70 ms   210 ms   211 ms  fa0-0-0.core1.cra.dublin.eircom.net [159.134.191.65] 
  5   371 ms   380 ms   391 ms  pos0-0-0.core1.thn.london.eircom.net [159.134.191.98] 
  6   350 ms   190 ms   581 ms  pos1-0-0.core1.the.london.eircom.net [159.134.191.14] 
  7   891 ms   211 ms   741 ms  ge-1.linx.londen02.uk.bb.verio.net [195.66.225.138] 
  8  1132 ms   580 ms   962 ms  p4-1-0-0.r80.nycmny01.us.bb.verio.net [129.250.4.181] 
  9   721 ms   751 ms   791 ms  p16-0-1-3.r21.nycmny01.us.bb.verio.net [129.250.2.170] 
 10  2003 ms   390 ms  1713 ms  p16-5-0-0.r02.asbnva01.us.bb.verio.net [129.250.5.99] 
 11  1752 ms  2514 ms  2023 ms  p16-7-0-0.r01.asbnva01.us.bb.verio.net [129.250.5.20] 
 12     *        *      892 ms  p16-3-0-0.r00.stngva01.us.bb.verio.net [129.250.2.74] 
 13   170 ms   340 ms   131 ms  ge-4-1.c00.stngva01.us.ah.vwh.net [129.250.27.184] 
 14   731 ms  1162 ms   731 ms  161.58.156.173 
 15   631 ms   381 ms   641 ms  vbforums.com [161.58.186.97] 

Trace complete.

**plenderj** · Jun 6th, 2002, 08:29 AM

Originally posted by filburt1
For some reason I doubt that John and the devs would port the several thousand lines of PHP code to use SQL Server rather than MySQL just because somebody thinks it's crap. The main reasons it uses MySQL in the first place is because (1) it's really fast, (2) it's free, and (3) most hosts who offer PHP offer only MySQL because of (1) and (2).

To hell with getting someone to host the forums.
Just build a fast server, and have the server hosted in a server farm somewhere.
And surely PHP can be used with SQL ?

**chrisjk** · Jun 6th, 2002, 09:03 AM

yes it can, but as has been said, MySQL is one of the fastest RDMS there is, SQL Server is poor in comparison.

**plenderj** · Jun 6th, 2002, 09:11 AM

http://www.microsoft.com/sql/evaluat.../fastfacts.asp
http://www.tpc.org/tpcc/results/tpcc_perf_results.asp
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/evaluat.../switchers.asp
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/evaluat...erformance.asp

I don't know why anyone would go with anything but proper SQL

**chrisjk** · Jun 6th, 2002, 09:19 AM

and microsoft are a trusted source? At least try and find some independent verification

And why isn't mysql proper exactly? Because it's free?!

http://www.pcmag.com/article/0,2997,a=23370,00.asp

**plenderj** · Jun 6th, 2002, 09:32 AM

Right so according to the analysis popup window, SQL server outdoes mySQL on everything but performance on JSP pages.
And the tests are also for extremely high utilization of the servers, not just normal activity.

And according to this :
http://common.ziffdavisinternet.com/...atures_SQL.xls

mySQL seems to do sweet FA in comparison to the other database servers

**chrisjk** · Jun 6th, 2002, 09:42 AM

as far as I'm aware, mysql's strength is in it's SELECT ability but INSERTS aren't as good. So it depends what you want to do with it

and it costs nothing

DB2 Universal Database 7.2
$20,000 per CPU (unlimited users)

Microsoft SQL Server 2000 SP2
$19,999 per CPU

MySQL 4.0
Free download; commercial license up to $200

Oracle9i Database
$40,000 per CPU (or $800 per named user)

What about SQL Servers shocking error rate?! 10%!!

**plenderj** · Jun 6th, 2002, 09:46 AM

Originally posted by chrisjk
as far as I'm aware, mysql's strength is in it's SELECT ability but INSERTS aren't as good. So it depends what you want to do with it

and it costs nothing

What about SQL Servers shocking error rate?! 10%!!

Well everyone makes mistakes from time to time don't they

**chrisjk** · Jun 6th, 2002, 09:54 AM

lol, yep

Dunno about you but I haven't got 20 grand to spend on that. If you have, well then fair enough I guess you get what you pay for.

mysql is still the most popular and in the end popularity wins over. And it's good for mission critical stuff...I doubt anything from MS can be considered so

**plenderj** · Jun 6th, 2002, 10:00 AM

Originally posted by chrisjk
And it's good for mission critical stuff...I doubt anything from MS can be considered so

*cough*splutter*cough*
dont get me started

**chrisjk** · Jun 6th, 2002, 10:09 AM

apart from Windows 2000 of course

**parksie** · Jun 6th, 2002, 02:39 PM

Code:

[mike@biscuit ~]> traceroute www.vbforums.com
traceroute to www.vbforums.com (161.58.186.97), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
 1  relativity (192.168.0.1)  0.845 ms  0.509 ms  0.479 ms
 2  bthg231-hg4.miltonkeynes.broadband.bt.net (217.35.199.203)  113.965 ms  18.473 ms  69.874 ms
 3  217.35.199.161 (217.35.199.161)  19.792 ms  18.370 ms  19.676 ms
 4  217.35.199.234 (217.35.199.234)  80.237 ms  26.966 ms  49.948 ms
 5  inh2cs01-602.imsnet2.btopenworld.com (62.7.251.1)  29.786 ms  27.913 ms  19.887 ms
 6  213.120.62.146 (213.120.62.146)  19.946 ms  28.757 ms  19.828 ms
 7  213.120.207.221 (213.120.207.221)  30.213 ms  26.751 ms  19.914 ms
 8  core2-pos4-3.bletchley.ukcore.bt.net (194.72.31.37)  19.921 ms  17.968 ms  19.883 ms
 9  core2-pos5-0.ealing.ukcore.bt.net (194.74.65.225)  29.972 ms  28.523 ms  19.864 ms
10  core2-pos7-0.telehouse.ukcore.bt.net (194.74.65.121)  29.984 ms  28.053 ms  60.122 ms
11  ge-1.linx.londen02.uk.bb.verio.net (195.66.225.138)  29.945 ms  25.450 ms  30.004 ms
12  p4-1-0-0.r80.nycmny01.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.4.181)  109.911 ms  97.767 ms  99.876 ms
13  p16-0-1-3.r21.nycmny01.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.2.170)  119.924 ms  97.732 ms  99.951 ms
14  p16-5-0-0.r02.asbnva01.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.5.99)  230.244 ms  108.736 ms  110.011 ms
15  p16-7-0-0.r01.asbnva01.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.5.20)  109.848 ms  107.356 ms  110.018 ms
16  p16-3-0-0.r00.stngva01.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.2.74)  109.942 ms  108.565 ms  109.949 ms
17  ge-4-1.c00.stngva01.us.ah.vwh.net (129.250.27.184)  250.018 ms  109.085 ms  109.890 ms
18  161.58.156.173 (161.58.156.173)  99.818 ms  108.313 ms  199.830 ms
19  vbforums.com (161.58.186.97)  110.356 ms  128.032 ms  110.086 ms
[mike@biscuit ~]> ping www.vbforums.com
PING www.vbforums.com (161.58.186.97) from 192.168.0.10 : 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from vbforums.com (161.58.186.97): icmp_seq=0 ttl=234 time=107.645 msec
64 bytes from vbforums.com (161.58.186.97): icmp_seq=1 ttl=234 time=260.223 msec
64 bytes from vbforums.com (161.58.186.97): icmp_seq=2 ttl=234 time=111.308 msec
64 bytes from vbforums.com (161.58.186.97): icmp_seq=3 ttl=234 time=102.499 msec
64 bytes from vbforums.com (161.58.186.97): icmp_seq=4 ttl=234 time=103.927 msec
64 bytes from vbforums.com (161.58.186.97): icmp_seq=5 ttl=234 time=105.164 msec
64 bytes from vbforums.com (161.58.186.97): icmp_seq=6 ttl=234 time=116.492 msec
64 bytes from vbforums.com (161.58.186.97): icmp_seq=7 ttl=234 time=268.036 msec

--- www.vbforums.com ping statistics ---
8 packets transmitted, 8 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 102.499/146.911/268.036/67.832 ms
[mike@biscuit ~]>

Looks like it should work, I just can't post anything....

**John** · Jun 6th, 2002, 07:54 PM

If you are going to put up the money for all these wonderful changes to MS software, then go ahead. Otherwise accept that we will continue to use free software as long as VB World is run as a free service by us.

**chrisjk** · Jun 6th, 2002, 08:00 PM

acid-tongue John strikes again!

**John** · Jun 6th, 2002, 08:03 PM

**plenderj** · Jun 7th, 2002, 02:26 AM

Originally posted by John
If you are going to put up the money for all these wonderful changes to MS software, then go ahead. Otherwise accept that we will continue to use free software as long as VB World is run as a free service by us.

Okay.
So if one of our companies gives you some decent kit, with Windows 2000 Server and SQL Server 2000 1CPU installed, you'd port VBF ?

**Jim Davis** · Jun 7th, 2002, 05:24 AM

Originally posted by NotLKH

Next time, try [/QUOTE]

AHAHAHAHAHA OO MY GOD!

i'm sorry, im was tired a bit

))
Jim

**Jim Davis** · Jun 7th, 2002, 05:28 AM

Originally posted by John
And blame the network not the server. Could you do a tracert next time, so that we can get some idea of where the problem is?

Thanks,
John

i'm sorry i was forgot the tracert :|

C:\>tracert www.vbforums.com

Tracing route to www.vbforums.com [161.58.186.97]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 30 ms 20 ms 30 ms as-46-1.matav.net [145.236.225.174]
2 20 ms 30 ms 30 ms fe2-1.core0-kecskemet.matav.net [145.236.145.5]

3 30 ms 30 ms 30 ms core0.matav.net [145.236.225.4]
4 241 ms 80 ms 40 ms g1-0-0.border2.matav.net [145.236.246.254]
5 50 ms 50 ms 51 ms dtag-if.matav.net [145.236.246.10]
6 140 ms 150 ms 151 ms Vienna-gw12.USA.net.DTAG.DE [62.156.131.190]
7 140 ms 150 ms 151 ms p4-1-1-0.r00.stngva01.us.bb.verio.net [129.250.9
.197]
8 140 ms 150 ms 151 ms ge-4-1.c00.stngva01.us.ah.vwh.net [129.250.27.18
4]
9 140 ms 151 ms 150 ms 161.58.156.173
10 150 ms 150 ms 151 ms vbforums.com [161.58.186.97]

Trace complete.

**parksie** · Jun 7th, 2002, 09:57 AM

Originally posted by John
If you are going to put up the money for all these wonderful changes to MS software, then go ahead. Otherwise accept that we will continue to use free software as long as VB World is run as a free service by us.

Nothing wrong with free software anyway, plus I expect you get better support for Linux/MySQL/PHP.....

Just out of interest, John, what's the technical spec of the server and how many sites are running off it?

**JoshT** · Jun 7th, 2002, 10:48 AM

I though John has two servers for us?

**parksie** · Jun 7th, 2002, 10:58 AM

As far as I knew, there were two (web and mysql), but they ran vbworld (and the forums), vbulletin.com, and vbulletin.org.....

**John** · Jun 7th, 2002, 06:40 PM

I think, too long since I last looked, approx 2 Dual P3-850, 1GB RAM, SCSI hard disks, one for DB, one for web server. Average about 400k pages per day, 250 people online most of the time. Load rarely gets high, particularly on the DB server.

John

**peet** · Jun 7th, 2002, 07:59 PM

Code:

Pinging www.vbforums.com [161.58.186.97] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=141ms TTL=233
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=140ms TTL=233
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=141ms TTL=233
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=140ms TTL=233
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=140ms TTL=233
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=140ms TTL=233
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=140ms TTL=233
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=140ms TTL=233
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=140ms TTL=233
Reply from 161.58.186.97: bytes=32 time=141ms TTL=233

Ping statistics for 161.58.186.97:
    Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 140ms, Maximum =  141ms, Average =  140ms



  1   <10 ms   <10 ms   <10 ms  192.168.1.254 

  2    20 ms    20 ms    20 ms  ti400720a080-l1.ti.telenor.net [80.212.160.0] 

  3    10 ms    20 ms    20 ms  ti400720d050-ge6-0.ti.telenor.net [146.172.164.97] 

  4    20 ms    30 ms    30 ms  ti400722c050-ge2-0.ti.telenor.net [146.172.222.33] 

  5    20 ms    20 ms    20 ms  ti400002c050-pos5-0.ti.telenor.net [146.172.252.198] 

  6    30 ms    30 ms    30 ms  ti200002c050-pos4-0.ti.telenor.net [146.172.248.33] 

  7    30 ms    30 ms    40 ms  ti200001c050-pos6-0.ti.telenor.net [146.172.248.10] 

  8    30 ms    40 ms    30 ms  ti100001c050-pos9-0.ti.telenor.net [146.172.248.14] 

  9    30 ms    30 ms    30 ms  ti100001b050-ge4-0.ti.telenor.net [146.172.248.62] 

 10    30 ms    30 ms    30 ms  nb01b11-ge5-0.nb.telenor.net [217.70.229.33] 

 11    30 ms    40 ms    30 ms  s-b3-pos8-0.telia.net [213.248.67.93] 

 12    40 ms    40 ms    30 ms  s-bb2-pos1-2-0.telia.net [213.248.66.9] 

 13    40 ms    50 ms    41 ms  kbn-bb2-pos0-1-0.telia.net [213.248.64.41] 

 14    70 ms    70 ms    80 ms  ldn-bb2-pos0-1-0.telia.net [213.248.64.66] 

 15    70 ms    70 ms    80 ms  213.248.74.10 

 16    70 ms    70 ms    80 ms  verio.telia.net [213.248.74.206] 

 17   141 ms   140 ms   140 ms  p4-1-0-0.r80.nycmny01.us.bb.verio.net [129.250.4.181] 

 18   130 ms   141 ms   140 ms  p16-0-1-3.r21.nycmny01.us.bb.verio.net [129.250.2.170] 

 19   140 ms   151 ms   160 ms  p16-5-0-0.r02.asbnva01.us.bb.verio.net [129.250.5.99] 

 20   140 ms   150 ms   151 ms  p16-7-0-0.r01.asbnva01.us.bb.verio.net [129.250.5.20] 

 21   140 ms   150 ms   140 ms  p16-3-0-0.r00.stngva01.us.bb.verio.net [129.250.2.74] 

 22   140 ms   140 ms   140 ms  ge-4-1.c00.stngva01.us.ah.vwh.net [129.250.27.184] 

 23   140 ms   150 ms   140 ms  161.58.156.173 

 24   140 ms   150 ms   141 ms  vbforums.com [161.58.186.97]

Thread: server sucks

Thread Tools

Display

server sucks

Re: server sucks

Re: Re: server sucks

Posting Permissions