Speed up?

[billrogers]

Anyone see a way to speed this function up??

void MpEvent(UINT32 eventID, UINT32 buffer)
{
    int l;
    UINT32 *row;
    if(mlb.logBuffer != NULL)
    {
        row = mlb.logBuffer[mlb.numEvent];
        row[0] = HWCLK32BIT;
        row[1] = SWCLK32BIT;
        row[2] = eventID;
        row[3] = buffer;
        ++mlb.numEvent;
        /* check to see if the end of the log buffer was reached */
        if(mlb.numEvent >= mlb.maxEvents) 
        {
            mlb.looped = TRUE;
            mlb.numEvent = 0;
        }
    }
    else 
    {
        /* We should never get here because the only way to free the log buffer 
        * is by calling MpLogFree, which turns logging off as well */
        printf("There is no buffer allocated for main path event logging\n");
    }

}

Any help appreciated...
Thanks
Bill

[Jop]

Is it that slow than?

[billrogers]

no it really isnt too slow, but all the more faster is better...

I am thinking of putting that whole function into assembly. The compiler is not very efficent, keeps recalculating the address of mlb.numEvent, when it really only needs to do it once and store that in a register, dumb thing. so that should give me a performance boost of sorts.

[abdul]

Maybe it'll be a bit faster if you replace

        if(mlb.numEvent >= mlb.maxEvents) 
        {
            mlb.looped = TRUE;
            mlb.numEvent = 0;
        } 

with

        mlb.numEvent >= mlb.maxEvents ?  mlb.looped = TRUE :     mlb.numEvent = 0; 

[billrogers]

Sorry that wouldn't work, the ? and : is a "if a then b else x"
not a "if a then b and c"

[abdul]

Oh never mind...

[billrogers]

not a problem,

a wrong solution is not a bad idea, just another solution that shows what doesn't work

[CornedBee]

I think the only thing you can do to speed this up is getting a better compiler.

Maybe this is a little bit faster:
instead of

        row[0] = HWCLK32BIT;
        row[1] = SWCLK32BIT;
        row[2] = eventID;
        row[3] = buffer;

do

        *row = HWCLK32BIT;
        ++row;
        *row = SWCLK32BIT;
        ++row;
        *row = eventID;
        ++row;
        *row = buffer;

But you'd have to check that. The 386 supports direct indexing which is supposed to be very fast, but you can never be sure.