|
-
Apr 29th, 2002, 07:41 AM
#27
Fanatic Member
Originally posted by simonm
Kzin
In the case of Dunblane, the guy had a license for the gun he used and had no trouble getting one despite the fact that he had known psycological problems.
Prior to Dunblane you could get licences for combat rifles. Now you can't which is the point that I was making about adjusting the law in steps and responding to known and removable threats rather than hypothetical ones (like plastic spoon massacres).
Last edited by Kzin; Apr 29th, 2002 at 08:04 AM.
 Looking for a friendly intelligent chat forum? Visit the white-hart.net 
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|
Reply With Quote