Kedaman
Hmm, I might have to dismiss what you just said as biased opinion
Yes, please do
>Religous people Know the truth (even if they are wrong).

Doesn't that sound like a contradiction to you?
Well it sounds like a contradiction but when taken within the correct context, it isn't!

What I am talking about here is the way religous people see reality. Everything around them is illuminated by this wonderful glowing light which they recognise as the truth. It might not be the truth but it doesn't matter because to them, it is.

We look at them and think they hold a belief. They don't see it as a belief (because it is implicit in the world "belief" that it is just a particular view point) but see it as something they know with as much certainty as they know themselves.
Not at all. Philosophers deals ... without caring about a truth.
It seems to me that the above sentance is missing something out. Something that goes where I have added the ellispses and is required to make that sentance, make sense. What do philosophers deal with? The study of truth and the nature of truth is the study of the meta rules of reality itself. What else, if not that, do philosophers deal with?

I never said that philosophers cared about any particular truth, indeed, they must avoid becomming too attached to any truth to avoid blinding themselves to the possibility of other, perhaps conflicting truths.