do you think that destroy anothers country can reduce the danger?

[Conogelato]

i fell that this situation are VERRY danger.

Think, not one of the resource involved was foreinger:
No the camp for learning to fly
No the fly, all domestic
not the credit card used to pay the ticket
Only the people involved, and maby not all

Then how many immigrants have USA?

The USA economical sistem is liberal, this meanning that anybody can go to a factory and buy someting. Heaven Weapon (gun)

This is a different tipe of war!!!!!!!

in Normaly war (old) the industrial power of a country against the industrial power of another country, but new the attackers use the industrial power of the country that they atack, THIS IS REALLY NEW, AND DANGER.

I WHANT remember you that you are in danger, and the danger come from inside now,.

remember
No a forenger fly
and not one forenger fly scholl.......
How many people can have entred the usa in the lasts years?

They have attack not only a simbol, but the USA TRANSPORT SISTEM, THAT IS VITAL for a country big as usa.
i think this can slow down the industrial production if you can't find a efficent and secure sistem for get the worker to job from a town to another distant manny manny chilometers. The sky is steel closed, this meanning paralisy.

And how can you control your immigrant in a multietical country like yours?

I think, now, the war is changed, and the ennemy is not onlyaffganistan.
And is also denger ( and not right) to criminalize all musly, especial in a free a multietical country like yours, but how can you avoid to train the terrorist, and that hem use yours industrila power??

I THINK THE JOB NOW MUST TO BE IN CONSCIUS THERM, EAVEIN IN WHATZ YOU DO OUTSIDE USA, BECAUSE AFER WTC THE WORD WAS CHANGED.

Remember

No one resource used by the attackers was forengers

No the fly scholl
no the car rented
No the house were they lived
No the fly

do you think that destroy anothers country can reduce the danger?