Quote Originally Posted by homer13j View Post
I would argue that the racist element didn't switch parties, it merely switched directions. So-called "affirmative action," racial quotas, and general racial bean counting are promoted almost exclusively by the Democrats. It is the Democrat party that has become obsessed with the color of skin, and when conservatives or Republicans (the two are no longer synonymous) try to argue in favor of judging people solely by the content of their character we are the ones automatically deemed as "racists."
I have no problem with what you said, and I wasn't talking about you anyways. The groups I am talking about are the Aryan Nations (you will find ID associated with them quite often), militia groups, constitutionalist, white supremacists, and other types. They are fringe groups, but entirely in the R column. At one point, though, their positions were not fringe, and at that time, I think they were largely D (Dixiecrats, KKK, etc.).

To go a bit further on the party split, notice that the Democrats have taken a strong majority in the house. The Rs can't block squat, but they don't need to, as the Ds are blocking things right and left. The D plan was to support anybody who would run as a D and could win. They built a tent so big that there are people in it who aren't even related (politically). Meanwhile, enrollment in the R party has declined significantly (though that doesn't mean the Ds are gaining, because they aren't, really). The base from which the Rs have drawn support has declined, while the base from which the Ds have drawn support has grown, but that base is changing its views. The generation that fought the race battles of Civil Rights is aging. Their replacements have much different agendas. However, this doesn't mean that they want to go R. This, coupled with the broad tent approach, could marginalize the Rs and split the Ds. Since no party wants to be powerless, I would expect that the major fault line in the R party would cause both sides to seek to merge with like minded groups. Right now, the two halves of the R party are not like minded, but remain together because unity gives each side a strength that they would otherwise lack. If the R party fades, the two halves will lack the incentive to remain in an uncomfortable union. As the D party changes, the two halves of the R party will merge with, and splinter, the unweildly D party.

All the pieces of this are currently in place. Furthermore, it has happened before in this country (we didn't always have Rs, and the Ds were once quite different). On the other hand, something totally different could happen. For one thing, there is considerable affinity for a party. After all, the Ds moved left on civil rights, but the south didn't switch parties until the passage of the Civil Rights Act shocked them out of a distaste for the R party that was still lingering from the Civil War, despite the fact that none of the people involved had been alive during the Civil War. Therefore, a percieved identification with a single party can keep people voting for that party long after the party has ceased to represent their interests.