USING: SQL Server 2005

I'm used to seeing Joins constructed using what I'll call the "Traditional" format:

Code:
SELECT *
FROM tbl1
INNER JOIN tbl2 
  ON tbl1.field1 = tbl2.field1
INNER JOIN tbl3
  ON tbl2.field2 = tbl2.field2
Apparently there is an "Alternative" format that allows you to nest the joins:
Code:
SELECT *
FROM tbl1
INNER JOIN tbl2 
    INNER JOIN tbl3
      ON tbl2.field2 = tbl2.field2
  ON tbl1.field1 = tbl2.field1
Besides the maintenance ick factor that I encounter when ever I see this construct... does any one know if there is a performance difference between the two?

I've got a query that is using this alternative construct, before I got in there deciphering what the joins really are, and re-arranging them to my liking, I'm curious to know if there would be any benefit to do so.

-tg