Does this look ok?
----------------------------------------------------------------------HTML Code:<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?> <TERM_LIBRARY> <NEW_TERM ID="1001"> <TERM>Something</TERM> <ACRONYM>Sing</ACRONYM> <ALTERNATE>S'thing</ALTERNATE> <CONTEXT>Used in a sentence something along the lines of this</CONTEXT> <IMAGES>YES <IMAGE ID="1">D:\Images\image1.jpg</IMAGE> <IMAGE ID="2">D:\Images\image2.jpg</IMAGE> <IMAGE ID="3">D:\Images\image3.jpg</IMAGE> <IMAGE ID="4">D:\Images\image4.jpg</IMAGE> </IMAGES> <VIDEOS>YES <VIDEO ID="1">D:\Video\video1.avi</VIDEO> <VIDEO ID="2">D:\Video\video2.avi</VIDEO> <VIDEO ID="3">D:\Video\video3.avi</VIDEO> </VIDEOS> <RELATED_TERMS>YES <RELATED ID="1">Other</RELATED> </RELATED_TERMS> </NEW_TERM> <NEW_TERM ID="2321"> <TERM>Happy</TERM> <ACRONYM>HPY</ACRONYM> <ALTERNATE>Smiley</ALTERNATE> <CONTEXT>Using XML isn't making me happy</CONTEXT> <IMAGES>NO</IMAGES> <VIDEOS>YES <VIDEO ID="1">D:\Video\video23.avi</VIDEO> </VIDEOS> <RELATED_TERMS>NO</RELATED_TERMS> </NEW_TERM> </TERM_LIBRARY>
I'm particularly interested in hearing anything about the Images / Video / Related sections. Should i be using the ID attribute as I have done? Is there a better way of structuring this info than I've tried?
I was wondering should the elements containing child nodes just be this for example:
<IMAGES>Yes
<IMAGE>Path here</IMAGE>
<IMAGE>Path here</IMAGE>
</IMAGES>
Any input is welcome
Stim




Reply With Quote