|
-
Nov 29th, 2001, 10:56 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Fanatic Member
The End of Time
I am just reading the "Dancers at the end of time" trilogy by Michael Moorcock and I think there are some very interesting points in there.
In the book, humanity has advanced as far as is physically possible and have long since converted entire galaxies into pure energy and stored it in such a way that they can channel it through "power" rings that each person wears.
So much enery they have stored that they can literally do anything they want. They no longer age, they have complete control over their appearance and can manipulate their environments at will. They no longer want or strive for anything. What ever their hearts desire, they can bring into being at will.
They live only for pleasure and self-gratification such that they no longer have any morals whatsoever. The have lost conception of right and wrong.
Does anybody think this is a state that the human race will one day reach? Indeed, should the human race even try to reach such a state? Would there be complete moral collapse? Is that a bad thing? If no one is vulnerable, does it matter what one does to someone else?
Do we need suffering and disapointment to retain our humanity?
Everything I say is either loose interpretation of dubious facts or idle speculation rooted in irrational sentiment. 
-
Nov 29th, 2001, 11:01 AM
#2
Fanatic Member
Re: The End of Time
Originally posted by simonm
Do we need suffering and disapointment to retain our humanity?
My, what a very cheery concept.
-
Nov 29th, 2001, 11:04 AM
#3
transcendental analytic
childish thinking
Use  
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
Nov 29th, 2001, 11:07 AM
#4
Thread Starter
Fanatic Member
What is our "ideal" then?
Is Society not striving to reduce suffering, effort and disapointment?
What if we become ultimately successful at that endeavour?
Everything I say is either loose interpretation of dubious facts or idle speculation rooted in irrational sentiment. 
-
Nov 29th, 2001, 11:17 AM
#5
transcendental analytic
Not the point
The physical world will become less and less important, basically the lack of physical resources and the growth of humanity, the growth of need of physical resources (ex food) needs to be retricted and finally cut off, the need of information will instead take over and strive growing consciousness and so expand the intelligence. Our primal needs and pleasures will loose their importance, we will learn new ways of gaining life experience trough more advanced forms of information, pure information.
So instead of going into a meaningless ownage of the universe, we become aware of how extreemly stupid that would be.
Use  
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
Nov 29th, 2001, 11:21 AM
#6
New Member
Cool...No more effort...That cant be bad right?
Im all for it...Where do I sign?
-
Nov 29th, 2001, 11:30 AM
#7
Thread Starter
Fanatic Member
So instead of going into a meaningless ownage of the universe, we become aware of how extreemly stupid that would be.
Will we care? We may lose all sense of consequances.
As long as there is still more universe to feed our power generators, all that we desire will be within our grasp. Limited only by our imagination.
What is "pure information", when it's at home?
Everything I say is either loose interpretation of dubious facts or idle speculation rooted in irrational sentiment. 
-
Nov 29th, 2001, 11:43 AM
#8
Fanatic Member
Originally posted by Fried Egg
Cool...No more effort...That cant be bad right?
Im all for it...Where do I sign?
Sadly, Cornwall will have declared independence from the rest of everything long before this, and as a result all progress within its borders will cease. You'll have to stick to the old fashioned method of making pasties.
Sorry, but you made your bed...
-
Nov 29th, 2001, 11:48 AM
#9
transcendental analytic
As long as there is still more universe to feed our power generators, all that we desire will be within our grasp. Limited only by our imagination.
Where's that power is going? Friction? How much of it is part of your life experience? What do you really experience?
The answer is information. You experience nothing more over information, there's no need for power to generate information, just you, your growing database of information is unlimited. The first thing we might do to survive the overgrowth and lack of resources here at Earth is substituting most critical needs with new interfaces that consume less physical resources. Say by eating vegetables, minimize unnessesary transportation, let the internet be your connection to the world, maybe later on transplanting digital media access devices directly to your brain as digital media converges or why not overthrows current lines of life experience, then fully separate mind from body, "mind uploading" meaning our existance is digital information, Then our needs will be phased down to friction of electrical impulses and maintenance of such a system, while the life experience phase can grow without bounds. All consciousness tied together in a network could strengthen a common consciousness, our Gaia
Use  
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
Nov 29th, 2001, 11:55 AM
#10
Thread Starter
Fanatic Member
there's no need for power to generate information
Ah! But one must expend energy to destroy information. According to information theory, anyway.
Everything I say is either loose interpretation of dubious facts or idle speculation rooted in irrational sentiment. 
-
Nov 29th, 2001, 11:57 AM
#11
Frenzied Member
Harry.
"From one thing, know ten thousand things."
-
Nov 29th, 2001, 12:05 PM
#12
New Member
-
Nov 29th, 2001, 07:43 PM
#13
PowerPoster
-
Nov 29th, 2001, 11:48 PM
#14
Frenzied Member
Simon and Ked, our neibourhood philosophers.
You just proved that sig advertisements work.
-
Nov 29th, 2001, 11:52 PM
#15
PowerPoster
-
Nov 29th, 2001, 11:58 PM
#16
Frenzied Member
We better not start.
You just proved that sig advertisements work.
-
Nov 30th, 2001, 12:09 AM
#17
PowerPoster
-
Nov 30th, 2001, 08:14 AM
#18
transcendental analytic
Originally posted by simonm
Ah! But one must expend energy to destroy information. According to information theory, anyway.
Information is indestructible isn't it? Anyways refering to a physical world i'm just holding a dangling pointer
Use  
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
Nov 30th, 2001, 08:57 AM
#19
Thread Starter
Fanatic Member
Originally Posted by Kedaman
Anyways refering to a physical world i'm just holding a dangling pointer
Man, put it away! I've just had my dinner and I really didn't welcome the sort of image that brings to mind!
Everything I say is either loose interpretation of dubious facts or idle speculation rooted in irrational sentiment. 
-
Nov 30th, 2001, 08:59 AM
#20
transcendental analytic
I thought it was a term only used between programmers
Use  
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
-
Nov 30th, 2001, 09:10 AM
#21
Thread Starter
Fanatic Member
I thought it was a term only used between programmers
I hope not...I'm picturing you standing there, trousers round your ankles, dangling pointer in your hand...
I've got a sick mind I know...
Everything I say is either loose interpretation of dubious facts or idle speculation rooted in irrational sentiment. 
-
Nov 30th, 2001, 09:20 AM
#22
transcendental analytic
Functors...
Templates...
iostream...
Okok, just testing (while holding a neurotic scanner in one hand over simons head)
Dangling pointers... (Getting critical readings, argh the scanner broke)
Use  
writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
writing haskell makes your life easier:
reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|