Results 1 to 33 of 33

Thread: WinME or WinXP??

  1. #1

    Thread Starter
    Hyperactive Member mastermind94's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Montréal, Canada
    Posts
    441

    WinME or WinXP??

    I have to choose between WinXP or WinME... Which one should I get to do development and using Multimedia API like DirectX and video acceleration (DVD-ROM and others)


    Thanx in advance...

    SXDev

  2. #2
    Monday Morning Lunatic parksie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Mashin' on the motorway
    Posts
    8,169
    Considering that XP isn't out yet, at the moment you have to go for ME

    I would suggest XP if you can wait because it's based on the Win2K core, and is supposed to be a lot more stable, as well as fully 32-bit
    I refuse to tie my hands behind my back and hear somebody say "Bend Over, Boy, Because You Have It Coming To You".
    -- Linus Torvalds

  3. #3
    Addicted Member Xenonic_Rob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    England, UK
    Posts
    213
    Yip - wait for XP.

    Rob Wright
    E-mail: [email protected]
    Website: http://www.xenonic.com
    The First Member of Honeybee's Club
    Favourite words: Zugzwang and Empiric

  4. #4
    chenko
    Guest
    Isnt there supposed to be a 64Bit version of XP?

  5. #5
    Monday Morning Lunatic parksie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Mashin' on the motorway
    Posts
    8,169
    Yes. But XP is based around an NT-derivative core, so there's no 16-bit code in it apart from the DOS virtual machine. WinME is still a Win9x base.
    I refuse to tie my hands behind my back and hear somebody say "Bend Over, Boy, Because You Have It Coming To You".
    -- Linus Torvalds

  6. #6
    ricmitch_uk
    Guest
    XP Anyday. If you can't wait, or can't afford, download the Beta for free


  7. #7
    Frenzied Member JungleMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    2,033
    I say get 2000 now, forget about the steaming pile of bloatware they call Windows XP.
    I'm bringing geeky back...

  8. #8

    Thread Starter
    Hyperactive Member mastermind94's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Montréal, Canada
    Posts
    441
    I have the beta version or WinXP and I know that Win2K is good but, it's based on WinNT core. WinNT core doesn't support DirectX and some others acceleration features. A friend of mine tried WinXP beta and didn't find any bugs so, I don't know but, you guys recommended me to use WinXP... Well, I can't wait and I guess I can't afford it so, let's go with XP Beta...

    Thanks alot guys...

  9. #9
    Frenzied Member JungleMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    2,033
    Originally posted by mastermind94
    I have the beta version or WinXP and I know that Win2K is good but, it's based on WinNT core. WinNT core doesn't support DirectX and some others acceleration features. A friend of mine tried WinXP beta and didn't find any bugs so, I don't know but, you guys recommended me to use WinXP... Well, I can't wait and I guess I can't afford it so, let's go with XP Beta...

    Thanks alot guys...
    Windows XP is also based on the NT core

    Of course Win2000 has DirectX support, Windows NT 4 doesn't...one of my friends is a diehard gamer and he uses 2k the only gaming probs it has is with older games

    wanted to clear that up
    I'm bringing geeky back...

  10. #10

    Thread Starter
    Hyperactive Member mastermind94's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Montréal, Canada
    Posts
    441
    Yeah... I don't want to get Win2K because, I never spent money on an opering system other than Linux. I got all my Windows copies from friends/relatives I'll see that... I decided to install WinXP and WinME on the same machine and choose...

  11. #11
    Hyperactive Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Calgary, Canada
    Posts
    453
    I'll just stick my hand up here and say: I have bought every windows operating system since 3.0. And I have always been happy with them except for ME. It's the biggest rip off on earth. I have "downgraded" a number of my machnes to 98 SE because it has far better driver support. Trust me in this ME, sucks. It adds few features, but alot of games don't run on it...... so why not run Windows 2000?

    SD
    "I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me than a full frontal lobotomy!"

  12. #12
    Addicted Member Xenonic_Rob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    England, UK
    Posts
    213
    I agree - I've downgraded too.

    ME is just plain stupid - drivers don't work, it crashes even more than Win98, and to top it all off, the help files are c_r_a_p:
    If you look on them, you'll see a topic on how to load your computer without loading Windows... then, lower down in the topic, it says, "Please note you cannot load your computer without loading WIndows" - duh!

    ME is a ripoff - they rushed it out and it shows that they did.

    Rob Wright
    E-mail: [email protected]
    Website: http://www.xenonic.com
    The First Member of Honeybee's Club
    Favourite words: Zugzwang and Empiric

  13. #13
    Hyperactive Member Wak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Brisbane, Queensland
    Posts
    298

    That's a good one!

    "how to load your computer without loading windows..." I'll look that up next time Windows doesn't start...
    Visual Basic 6.0 Enterprise
    Visual C++ 6.0 Professional

    Wak

  14. #14
    Monday Morning Lunatic parksie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Mashin' on the motorway
    Posts
    8,169
    *grin*

    Win2000 has DirectX 8 support, so no problems there The only games that won't run well or at all are those that try direct hardware access (especially older ones).
    I refuse to tie my hands behind my back and hear somebody say "Bend Over, Boy, Because You Have It Coming To You".
    -- Linus Torvalds

  15. #15
    Frenzied Member JungleMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    2,033
    Originally posted by Xenonic_Rob
    you cannot load your computer without loading WIndows
    ROFLMAO!!!

    They are really trying to shield these newbies from DOS that they are making up lies about their computers
    I'm bringing geeky back...

  16. #16
    Addicted Member Xenonic_Rob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    England, UK
    Posts
    213
    It's ridiculous! It's as though they copied the Win98 help files, changing Win98 to WinME and then didn't edit it !!

    Rob Wright
    E-mail: [email protected]
    Website: http://www.xenonic.com
    The First Member of Honeybee's Club
    Favourite words: Zugzwang and Empiric

  17. #17
    Monday Morning Lunatic parksie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Mashin' on the motorway
    Posts
    8,169
    Hehehe Oh well, looks like a good bet for not going for ME then
    I refuse to tie my hands behind my back and hear somebody say "Bend Over, Boy, Because You Have It Coming To You".
    -- Linus Torvalds

  18. #18
    Addicted Member Xenonic_Rob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    England, UK
    Posts
    213
    Yip
    ME is pants.

    Rob Wright
    E-mail: [email protected]
    Website: http://www.xenonic.com
    The First Member of Honeybee's Club
    Favourite words: Zugzwang and Empiric

  19. #19

    Thread Starter
    Hyperactive Member mastermind94's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Montréal, Canada
    Posts
    441
    Bill Gay-tes said himself that WinME is more fun to use and will be more stable than Win98... Is that true or simply a marketing thingny???

    So, awright, ME is no good...

  20. #20
    scoutt
    Guest
    originally posted by Wak
    "how to load your computer without loading windows..." I'll look that up next time Windows doesn't start
    that is the same thing as hitting START to shutdown,

  21. #21
    Monday Morning Lunatic parksie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Mashin' on the motorway
    Posts
    8,169
    I never shut my PC down..... I've only seen the boot menu twice in the past 3 weeks - I only restart it
    I refuse to tie my hands behind my back and hear somebody say "Bend Over, Boy, Because You Have It Coming To You".
    -- Linus Torvalds

  22. #22
    transcendental analytic kedaman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    0x002F2EA8
    Posts
    7,221
    I never even restart in XP i can do hibernate which saves my memory on HDD and loads it back when i turn it on again. (it works alot faster but with 256M RAM it takes some 8 seconds)
    Use
    writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
    writing haskell makes your life easier:
    reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
    To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.

  23. #23
    Monday Morning Lunatic parksie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Mashin' on the motorway
    Posts
    8,169
    Yeah, well you just try running Win98 for more than a week then
    I refuse to tie my hands behind my back and hear somebody say "Bend Over, Boy, Because You Have It Coming To You".
    -- Linus Torvalds

  24. #24

    Thread Starter
    Hyperactive Member mastermind94's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Montréal, Canada
    Posts
    441
    Is WinXP takes alot of ressources??? What is the recommended system configuration so far?

  25. #25
    Banished Cander's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Why do you care?
    Posts
    6,913
    Simple answer. WinME is aweful. Locks up more than anything else I have ever used. Very annoying. Im switching to a Windows 2000/Red Hat isntall this weekend when I get everything backed up.
    Stack Overflow
    See the features of Visual Studio 2010 and C# 4.0: The 10-4 show on Channel9

  26. #26
    transcendental analytic kedaman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    0x002F2EA8
    Posts
    7,221
    WinXP has this cool feature, system checkpoints, you can shedule it to back up your system for instance once a week and if it crashes later on you can restore the whole system. I haven't tested it since my system never crashed but one of my friends had a crash when he installed lots of apps and system restore worked nice
    Use
    writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
    writing haskell makes your life easier:
    reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
    To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.

  27. #27
    Frenzied Member JungleMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    2,033
    Originally posted by mastermind94
    Is WinXP takes alot of ressources??? What is the recommended system configuration so far?
    I think it is like 500mhz P3, at least 128 megs of RAM, 256 if you are using multiple users, 1.5 GB available disk space...it's crazy, and even then it is bloated...

    Win2k runs fine with 96 megs, 350mhz, and takes 500 megs disk space, and it is better and less full of $hit

    WIN 2000 4 LIFE
    I'm bringing geeky back...

  28. #28
    Frenzied Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    East Providence, RI
    Posts
    1,715
    I say go with DOS 6.2 you probobly already have all the memory you'll ever need. It will probobly load the whole os into your ram for blazzing speeds. DOS 6.2 is that way to go!


    ~~~Dimava~~~
    NXSupport - Your one-stop source for computer help

  29. #29
    transcendental analytic kedaman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    0x002F2EA8
    Posts
    7,221
    I'd say XP runs much faster than 2000. if you don't need the flashy features, turn them off. XP need about 1G space, memory usage is about the same as in 2000.

    dos is very nice os for a vb programmer
    Use
    writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
    writing haskell makes your life easier:
    reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
    To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.

  30. #30
    Good Ol' Platypus Sastraxi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    5,134
    Did you know that they have an internet browser for DOS? It even supports javascript. I'm typing this in right now in DOS!!!
    All contents of the above post that aren't somebody elses are mine, not the property of some media corporation.
    (Just a heads-up)

  31. #31
    transcendental analytic kedaman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    0x002F2EA8
    Posts
    7,221
    nope, can you post a screenshot?
    Use
    writing software in C++ is like driving rivets into steel beam with a toothpick.
    writing haskell makes your life easier:
    reverse (p (6*9)) where p x|x==0=""|True=chr (48+z): p y where (y,z)=divMod x 13
    To throw away OOP for low level languages is myopia, to keep OOP is hyperopia. To throw away OOP for a high level language is insight.

  32. #32
    scoutt
    Guest
    Originally Posted by Sastraxi
    Did you know that they have an internet browser for DOS? It even supports javascript. I'm typing this in right now in DOS!!!
    I also heard it will fit on a floppy, is that true? I have not tried it.

  33. #33
    Fanatic Member PsychoMark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    540
    DOS: Love it, but only as a console for quickly executing some rename commands and such... I've been working with DOS since our first 8086, but I like Windows a lot more...
    Win98: Good...
    WinME: Win98 with a lot of extra bull****, on a scale of 1 to 10, I'd give it the number -20

    WinXP: Win2K with a lot of extra bull****, too slow, too annoying... so what if I turn everything off, that would leave me with just a slow version of Win2K
    Win2K: GREAT!! Love it!! Runs perfectly on my P133!!! Never even crashed!! My OS for life (well, at least until they release a better version that is, but not XP)...


    And that's my opinion...
    Teaudirenopossum.Musasapientumfixaestinaure.
    (I can't hear you. There's a banana in my ear)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  



Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width