Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: NASA uses DOS

  1. #1

    Thread Starter
    I'm about to be a PowerPoster! kleinma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    NJ - USA (Near NYC)
    Posts
    23,373

    NASA uses DOS

    Interesting article about how data from a disk drive recovered from the columbia disaster was salvaged, thanks to the computer running DOS instead of another operating system, including Windows.

    http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/space/0....ap/index.html

  2. #2

    Thread Starter
    I'm about to be a PowerPoster! kleinma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    NJ - USA (Near NYC)
    Posts
    23,373

    Re: NASA uses DOS

    on the other hand.... this article made me feel kind of old, when they called DOS ancient

  3. #3
    Frenzied Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Toronto, ON
    Posts
    1,093

    Re: NASA uses DOS

    Well, at least they don't use Vista. Wouldn't be good to have every shuttle blow up.
    (VB/C#) is clearly superior to (C#/VB) because it (has/doesn't have) <insert trivial difference here>.

  4. #4

    Thread Starter
    I'm about to be a PowerPoster! kleinma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    NJ - USA (Near NYC)
    Posts
    23,373

    Re: NASA uses DOS

    A Vista bashing comment? how clever.. haven't seen one of those in ages

  5. #5
    Frenzied Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Toronto, ON
    Posts
    1,093

    Re: NASA uses DOS

    You can always rely on the old classics.
    (VB/C#) is clearly superior to (C#/VB) because it (has/doesn't have) <insert trivial difference here>.

  6. #6
    type Woss is new Grumpy; wossname's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    #!/bin/bash
    Posts
    5,682

    Re: NASA uses DOS

    but the 340-megabyte drive was only half full
    ...We mortals can only dream of the wonders of near-unlimited government funding.
    I don't live here any more.

  7. #7

  8. #8
    Hyperactive Member Quasar6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Sol 3
    Posts
    325

    Re: NASA uses DOS

    As someone who uses Vista I might be a little biased, but I think Tom Sawyers comment was ...

    ... completely accurate.
    "Why do all my attempts at science end with me getting punched by batman?" xkcd.

    |Pong||
    Sorry for not posting more often.

  9. #9
    Frenzied Member MaximilianMayrhofer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    IM IN YR LOOP
    Posts
    2,001

    Re: NASA uses DOS

    In your case, it's most likely a pebkac error. The only computer you couldn't crash would be one that you hadn't figured out how to turn on.

  10. #10
    Hyperactive Member Quasar6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Sol 3
    Posts
    325

    Re: NASA uses DOS

    No? Try me.

    It would take a bit of effort, but I could probably get a BSoD on a computer which wasn't even plugged in... providing, of course, that Windows was already installed.

    Besides, I used XP for a good 4 years without seeing a BSoD (although I have no doubt they occured... BSoD's are sneaky creatures)... and then I get two within an equal number of weeks with Vista.

    On the other hand, maybe you shouldn't try defragging, rendering, copying, playing a game and coding at the same time... [trails off...]

    Worst thing was, I lost my unsaved render, my code and my game. Bloody Vista.
    Last edited by Quasar6; May 12th, 2008 at 12:32 AM.
    "Why do all my attempts at science end with me getting punched by batman?" xkcd.

    |Pong||
    Sorry for not posting more often.

  11. #11
    Frenzied Member MaximilianMayrhofer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    IM IN YR LOOP
    Posts
    2,001

    Re: NASA uses DOS

    Oh my, yeeees, blame Vista for not being able to pander to all of your geeky desires simultaneously

    Might as well blame the processor for not supporting parallel processing.

  12. #12
    Hyperactive Member Foxer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    278

    Re: NASA uses DOS

    Quote Originally Posted by MaximilianMayrhofer
    Might as well blame the processor for not supporting parallel processing.
    That would be Micro$ofts fault to.
    Rate my response if I helped

    Go Hard Or Go Home


  13. #13
    PowerPoster techgnome's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    34,687

    Re: NASA uses DOS

    The reason for the use of DOS. ... the shuttles run on 5 8086 chips... in fact there was a call out from NASA looking for old machines that still had the 8086 chips, as they were stockpiling in order to have spares.

    -tg
    * I don't respond to private (PM) requests for help. It's not conducive to the general learning of others.*
    * I also don't respond to friend requests. Save a few bits and don't bother. I'll just end up rejecting anyways.*
    * How to get EFFECTIVE help: The Hitchhiker's Guide to Getting Help at VBF - Removing eels from your hovercraft *
    * How to Use Parameters * Create Disconnected ADO Recordset Clones * Set your VB6 ActiveX Compatibility * Get rid of those pesky VB Line Numbers * I swear I saved my data, where'd it run off to??? *

  14. #14
    I'm about to be a PowerPoster! mendhak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Ulaan Baator GooGoo: Frog
    Posts
    38,170

    Re: NASA uses DOS

    Imagine a space shuttle that ran on the OSX. It wouldn't do anything, "But look, it fits in a plain manila envelope!"

  15. #15

    Thread Starter
    I'm about to be a PowerPoster! kleinma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    NJ - USA (Near NYC)
    Posts
    23,373

    Re: NASA uses DOS

    if the space shuttle ran on OSX, Apple would have required NASA to also let them build the shuttle

  16. #16
    Hyperactive Member Quasar6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Sol 3
    Posts
    325

    Re: NASA uses DOS

    And then the shuttles would only be able to launch from Apple-built pads, which would only be constructed in Apple-owned countries.

    Might as well blame the processor for not supporting parallel processing.
    I'll have you know I'm running a quad core. My geeky desires are fully pandered.

    That would be Micro$ofts fault to.
    Exactly! Now you're getting it.
    "Why do all my attempts at science end with me getting punched by batman?" xkcd.

    |Pong||
    Sorry for not posting more often.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  



Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width