|
-
Feb 23rd, 2001, 10:38 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Frenzied Member
Did you know that the following series diverges? Id est: It grows without an upper bound.
Code:
1 + 1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5 + 1/6 . . . 1/n . . .
It eventually gets big beyond belief.
Live long & prosper.
The Dinosaur from prehistoric era prior to computers.
Eschew obfuscation!
If a billion people believe a foolish idea, it is still a foolish idea!
VB.net 2010 Express
64Bit & 32Bit Windows 7 & Windows XP. I run 4 operating systems on a single PC.
-
Feb 23rd, 2001, 02:57 PM
#2
Monday Morning Lunatic
Nope...but then we get into the realms of infinity which REALLY f**ks my brain over...so I try not to think about it too much.
I just thought it gets closer to infinity as you sum to infinity?
I refuse to tie my hands behind my back and hear somebody say "Bend Over, Boy, Because You Have It Coming To You".
-- Linus Torvalds
-
Feb 23rd, 2001, 08:36 PM
#3
Hyperactive Member
You must be thinking of
Code:
1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + 1/16 + 1/32...
which approaches 1. The arithmetic variation
Code:
1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5 + 1/6..
is not only bigger at each stage, but the margin by which it is bigger grows as well, thus resulting in what you originally stated.
-
Feb 24th, 2001, 11:49 PM
#4
Thread Starter
Frenzied Member
Diverges sloooowly.
While I have known for a long time that this series diverges, I never realized how slowly it grows. I just used my mathCad Software to do some calculations.
Here are the results.
07.485 at 1000 terms.
09.788 at 10000 terms.
12.090 at 100000.
14.393 at one million terms.
It is not growing without bound very fast. If I did the calculations correctly, a person might think that it does not diverge.
There is a proof that it grows without bound, and I always believe valid proofs.
Live long & prosper.
The Dinosaur from prehistoric era prior to computers.
Eschew obfuscation!
If a billion people believe a foolish idea, it is still a foolish idea!
VB.net 2010 Express
64Bit & 32Bit Windows 7 & Windows XP. I run 4 operating systems on a single PC.
-
Mar 1st, 2001, 05:24 PM
#5
Frenzied Member
The proof is contained here as well as a proof that the sum of the reciprocals of the prime numbers diverges.
If it wasn't for this sentence I wouldn't have a signature at all.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|