In that case your formula and approach are looking good to me(if that is of any value).
Only your last statement makes me wonder.
Is it just a matter of finding the gradient on either side of the X value and subtracting...
(GradientOnRightSide - GradientOnLeftSide) / 2A
It should say: Is it just a matter of finding the value on either side of the X value and calculating the difference to get the gradient (Increse/Decrease) at the point X.
(ValueRightSide - ValueLeftSide) / 2A
You're welcome to rate this post!
If your problem is solved, please use the Mark thread as resolved button Wait, I'm too old to hurry!
Originally posted by opus
Only your last statement makes me wonder.
Lets put it this way, a Y value at X might indicate instantaneous speed. The gradient at that same point would indicate the acceleration.
The rate of change of gradient would be to measure the amount of curvature at X. To continue the analogy, delta gradient would be called "jerk" or rate of change of acceleration.
Instead of measuring the Y value on either side of X (to find the gradient) I'd be measuring the gradient on either side of X. This should give me the rate of change of gradient (the curve at X).
I'm thinking about taking it a step further and measuring the rate of change of jerk too! (this would be called "Jounce").
Lost in translation again, but OK. That would be the third derivative, although I can't give any verbal explantion above the first derivative (Acceleration/Deceleration). But you can jerk and jounce as you want, as long as you continue each step in the same logic.
Hey, that was the topic of my verbal exam when leaving school about 26 years ago!
You're welcome to rate this post!
If your problem is solved, please use the Mark thread as resolved button Wait, I'm too old to hurry!