|
-
May 10th, 2004, 08:23 AM
#1
Classic Visual Basic?
Classic?
I thought VB6 was still alive.
-
May 10th, 2004, 08:36 AM
#2
Retired VBF Adm1nistrator
There's always one isn't there 
We need to differentiate more between .NET and VB5/6...
Microsoft MVP : Visual Developer - Visual Basic [2004-2005]
-
May 10th, 2004, 08:38 AM
#3
Fair enough, good differentiation.
-
May 10th, 2004, 08:47 AM
#4
Retired VBF Adm1nistrator
Microsoft MVP : Visual Developer - Visual Basic [2004-2005]
-
May 10th, 2004, 09:00 AM
#5
Can't you write
Classic Visual Basic X
or
Visual Basic X
or
Visual BAsic 1-6
or
Visual Basic 4/5/6
or something...
-
May 10th, 2004, 09:53 AM
#6
General Visual Basic (Not .NET, the other ones. You know, 1 - 6. The ones before .NET came out. Yeah them.)
Laugh, and the world laughs with you. Cry, and you just water down your vodka.
Take credit, not responsibility
-
May 10th, 2004, 10:19 AM
#7
Lively Member
I was always partial to "Visul Basics"
-
May 10th, 2004, 10:38 AM
#8
Need to be careful, because the next version of Visual Basic most likely won't have ".NET" in its name.....
Visual Studio 2005 is the announced name for Visual Studio -- note there is no .NET. 
Brad!
-
May 10th, 2004, 12:14 PM
#9
Why can't we simply call it Visual Basic 1-6 ???
-
May 10th, 2004, 12:22 PM
#10
Ex-Super Mod'rater
Yeah what about: Visual BASIC (Pre .Net)
Like you have in the comment for it.
Mind I don't actually mind Classic Visual BASIC.
When your thread has been resolved please edit the original post in the thread (  )
and amend "-[RESOLVED]-" to the end of the title and change the icon to  , Thank you.
When posting Code use the [VBCode]Code Here[/VBCode] tags to be able to use the code highlighting.

-
May 10th, 2004, 12:28 PM
#11
I'm willing to consider additional changes.
Get agreement with forum's moderators on what to change it to and then I'll look at changing it.
Brad!
-
May 10th, 2004, 12:28 PM
#12
How about "Visual Basic (Episodes 1 - 6)" or "Visual Basic (Seasons 1 - 6)" or "Visual Basic (I - VI)" or "Visual Basic (not .NET)" or "Visual Basic (.NET - NOT!)"
TG
-
May 10th, 2004, 12:30 PM
#13
Visual Basic 4/5/6
Would be better with the search engines, more noticeable than "Classic Visual Basic"
Remember, search engines are important.
-
May 10th, 2004, 12:37 PM
#14
Frenzied Member
ahem
SOME of us are still desperately clinging to "classic" vb
it's still hip, it's still with it
-
May 10th, 2004, 12:57 PM
#15
Originally posted by brad jones
... Visual Studio 2005 is the announced name for Visual Studio -- note there is no .NET. 
Brad!
With this in mind and known Micro$oft - VB.Net may become the "classic" as soon as next year.
-
May 10th, 2004, 02:35 PM
#16
Member
Visual Basic Classic makes it sound like a soda. Mmmm.... I lke Coke. (and it's the first thing I thought of when I saw the new title to the section.)
Wouldn't it be better if you could make me think of Pepsi insead?
-
May 10th, 2004, 02:43 PM
#17
Originally posted by qbaholic
Wouldn't it be better if you could make me think of Pepsi insead?
Visual - It's the Basic.
-
May 10th, 2004, 06:27 PM
#18
PowerPoster
Yeah, go with Visual Basic 4-6 (screw the ones before 'em). And why are we worrying about something thats not going to be released until next year?
-
May 10th, 2004, 07:07 PM
#19
Ex-Super Mod'rater
I will go for: Visual Basic 4-6
Too. .
When your thread has been resolved please edit the original post in the thread (  )
and amend "-[RESOLVED]-" to the end of the title and change the icon to  , Thank you.
When posting Code use the [VBCode]Code Here[/VBCode] tags to be able to use the code highlighting.

-
May 10th, 2004, 09:14 PM
#20
Member
Personally, I prefer the Visual Basic X, but why not just Visual Basic. If both are present, (VB.NET and Visual Basic) People will know the difference.
-
May 11th, 2004, 09:54 AM
#21
Originally posted by qbaholic
Personally, I prefer the Visual Basic X, but why not just Visual Basic. If both are present, (VB.NET and Visual Basic) People will know the difference.
But they don't! I can't tell you how many times I move posts from new people from VB to .NET.
-
May 11th, 2004, 10:26 AM
#22
Originally posted by MartinLiss
I can't tell you how many times I move posts from new people from VB to .NET.
I can't tell you how many times I've noticed you move them!
-
May 12th, 2004, 10:01 AM
#23
Originally posted by Pc_Madness
Yeah, go with Visual Basic 4-6 (screw the ones before 'em)...
We can't ignore'm all - there are many busineses that still using VB3 which was pretty much major release at the time.
-
May 12th, 2004, 05:26 PM
#24
Stuck in the 80s
I think Visual Basic: Old School would work best.
-
May 12th, 2004, 06:11 PM
#25
Member
I think that standardization of name is a good thing. Don't you think that you might confust the new users to this forum by using two names for the same thing. One or the other should change to match the other so that there is no confusion then.
"CodeBank - Visual Basic 6 (and before)"
"Classic Visual Basic"
Hmm.... maybe the "Classic Visual Basic" should be changed to "Visual Basic 6 (and before)"
How important is nomiclature anyway?
-
May 13th, 2004, 06:38 AM
#26
Fanatic Member
Visual Basic.NET and Visual Basic.NOT
Martin J Wallace (Slaine)
-
May 13th, 2004, 06:50 AM
#27
PowerPoster
Originally posted by Slaine
Visual Basic.NET and Visual Basic.SNOT
Visual Basic 3/4/5/6 then.
-
May 13th, 2004, 08:43 AM
#28
Since its been explained VB.Net is a one shot Name, we could have the following:
VB.BeforeNet
VB.Net
VB.AfterNet
-
May 13th, 2004, 09:09 AM
#29
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|