|
-
Apr 10th, 2004, 12:32 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Addicted Member
folding squares..geometry SOLVEDO
When this net of six squares is cut out and folded to form a cube, what is the product of the numbers on the four faces adjacent to the one labeled 1?
Last edited by dolor; Apr 10th, 2004 at 11:22 PM.
- you've been privileged to read a post by Miz
-
Apr 10th, 2004, 12:39 PM
#2
-
Apr 10th, 2004, 01:51 PM
#3
Thread Starter
Addicted Member
- you've been privileged to read a post by Miz
-
Apr 10th, 2004, 04:21 PM
#4
144
I once did this with a hypercube, no sweat
I don't live here any more.
-
Apr 11th, 2004, 07:52 PM
#5
-
Apr 11th, 2004, 08:54 PM
#6
Thread Starter
Addicted Member
Originally posted by alkatran
I'd love to see a 4d object.[
well, you'd be rich if you could, seeing as how we can't visualize objects in dimensions higher than 3d.
- you've been privileged to read a post by Miz
-
Apr 11th, 2004, 10:52 PM
#7
Fanatic Member
Of course not (I knew someone would say that). But we can 'put' 3d objects on 2d surfaces, so we could put a 4d object on a 3d surface (and then on a 2d) to get .. a general idea, right?
Don't pay attention to this signature, it's contradictory.
-
Apr 12th, 2004, 02:23 PM
#8
Thread Starter
Addicted Member
Originally posted by alkatran
Of course not (I knew someone would say that). But we can 'put' 3d objects on 2d surfaces, so we could put a 4d object on a 3d surface (and then on a 2d) to get .. a general idea, right?
well, go ahead and 'put' it on a 3d object, but i doubt it would make sense. when you represent a 3d object on a 2d object, it is only possible because we are capable of understanding what it looks like in 3d (because we've seen it before). or at least that's what i think.
- you've been privileged to read a post by Miz
-
Apr 12th, 2004, 02:35 PM
#9
Frenzied Member
Last edited by Acidic; Apr 12th, 2004 at 02:46 PM.
Have I helped you? Please Rate my posts. 
-
Apr 12th, 2004, 02:41 PM
#10
Probably the easiest way would be to lock 1 dimension of the cube and simply represent it as a 3d object. You could make a movie (adding one more dimension, time) that would accurately show a hypercube. Time would corrolate to the 4th dimension of the cube, causing it to be a represenation of a four-d object (only because we actually have 4 dimensions )
The time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time.
Bertrand Russell
<- Remember to rate posts you find helpful.
-
Apr 16th, 2004, 07:57 PM
#11
Fanatic Member
After reading that... wow.. A lot of it is just too hard to imagine. I liked the pics of the hypercube though.
Don't pay attention to this signature, it's contradictory.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|