Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Proof by Induction

  1. #1

    Thread Starter
    I'm about to be a PowerPoster! mendhak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Ulaan Baator GooGoo: Frog
    Posts
    38,170

    Question Proof by Induction

    What is "Induction Hypothesis"?

    This question has me stumped, any help?

    We define the sequence L by L0=5 and for k>=1,
    Lk=2Lk-1-7.

    a) Determine L4 <--- This one I got.. duh

    b) Prove by induction that Lk= 7-2k+1
    I can't figure out b. Any help appreciated. Thanks.

  2. #2
    vbuggy krtxmrtz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    In a probability cloud
    Posts
    5,573
    You verify it's true for k=1, then you try to prove that if it holds for k=n-1 then it will also hold for k=n.
    Since n can be any number and it's true for k=1, then it must be true for k=2, and therefore for k=3, and then for k=4, and so on.

    For your specific problem you first see it's true for k=1:

    L1 = 2L0 - 7 = 3
    and
    L1 = 7 - 22 = 3

    Now assume it's true for k= n - 1, i.e. assume Ln-1 = 7 - 2n holds. Let's prove it for k=n. We must prove that Ln = 7 - 2n+1

    Indeed:

    Ln = 2Ln-1 -7 = 2*(7 - 2n) - 7 =

    (because we have ssumed the expression is valid for k = n-1)

    = 14 - 2*2n - 7 = 7 - 2n+1

  3. #3

    Thread Starter
    I'm about to be a PowerPoster! mendhak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Ulaan Baator GooGoo: Frog
    Posts
    38,170
    Originally posted by krtxmrtz
    You verify it's true for k=1, then you try to prove that if it holds for k=n-1 then it will also hold for k=n.
    Since n can be any number and it's true for k=1, then it must be true for k=2, and therefore for k=3, and then for k=4, and so on.



    Thanks... I understood the solution. What I have quoted here, this is the actual 'induction hypothesis'? SO I can safely apply it to any question I see with the words "induction hypothesis" in there?

  4. #4
    vbuggy krtxmrtz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    In a probability cloud
    Posts
    5,573
    I have explained this induction hypothesis in my own words, perhaps it was not quite strict from the mathematical/philosophical point of view.

    It may be worth a visit to http://www.bath.ac.uk/~ma1gpg/summatio.htm or try to search the words by means of altavista, google, askjeeves or any other search engine you like. You should find tons of information.

  5. #5

    Thread Starter
    I'm about to be a PowerPoster! mendhak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Ulaan Baator GooGoo: Frog
    Posts
    38,170
    OK, Thanks for the help.

  6. #6
    Fanatic Member sql_lall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Up Above (i.e. AUS)
    Posts
    571

    Talking Strong induction.

    Ok, i'm not sure if this will help or complicate the subject, but there is also a bigger, "Better" version of induction, called Strong Induction.

    The induction mentioned by krtxmrtz was where you assume that it is true for k = n-1, and proove it for k = n

    However, in Strong induction, you assume it is true for ALL k < n, and use this to proove for k = n
    sql_lall

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  



Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width