|
-
Jun 26th, 2002, 03:01 PM
#1
PHP Editor?
Im new to PHP (Very experienced ASP developer though).... Anyone recommend a good PHP editor?
-
Jun 26th, 2002, 05:46 PM
#2
Stuck in the 80s
Notepad?
Althought personally I use HomeSite for it's built in File Explorer.
-
Jun 26th, 2002, 05:47 PM
#3
Stuck in the 80s
I've also used EditPlus before and it's pretty good with PHP.
-
Jun 26th, 2002, 06:08 PM
#4
-
Jun 26th, 2002, 06:14 PM
#5
Stuck in the 80s
Originally posted by joan_fl
Uggghh notepad. LOL
-
Jun 26th, 2002, 06:17 PM
#6
Fanatic Member
http://www.textpad.com
extremely good. has good tyntax highlighting for almost every language around (its customiseable)
-
Jun 26th, 2002, 06:18 PM
#7
-
Jun 26th, 2002, 06:21 PM
#8
Stuck in the 80s
Originally posted by joan_fl
A bit foregone isnt it.
Yes, I guess you're right. How can we use a text editor that doesn't write all the code for us and play Mp3's at the same time? You are right. 
It's pretty funny we still use the same rakes they used 100 years ago but we can't seem to use the same text editor they used 15 years ago.
-
Jun 26th, 2002, 06:22 PM
#9
Thanks.. Im checking it out.
-
Jun 26th, 2002, 08:54 PM
#10
Hyperactive Member
no one has invented a better rake than what we had a 100 years ago.
editplus and textpad don't write code for you. they simply have integrated file explores and syntax highlighting. The key here is efficiency.
joan: i personaly use editplus for most of my programming. you can set up user tools so you can compile and run your code (like java and c) right from the editor. it also has customizable syntax hilighting (you can download, add, and modify sytax files). It's very user friendly.
Last edited by Kagey; Jun 26th, 2002 at 08:57 PM.
-
Jun 26th, 2002, 09:00 PM
#11
Stuck in the 80s
Originally posted by Kagey
no one has invented a better rake than what we had a 100 years ago.
Leaf Blower/Sucker? Ever heard of it?
-
Jun 26th, 2002, 09:29 PM
#12
Hyperactive Member
yeah, but its not a rake.
continueing the comparison of a text editor to a rake: if people have moved on to cleaning their yards with a leaf blower, then people who program have move from a bare-bones text editor to a code editor.
-
Jun 27th, 2002, 09:53 AM
#13
Stuck in the 80s
Originally posted by Kagey
yeah, but its not a rake.
continueing the comparison of a text editor to a rake: if people have moved on to cleaning their yards with a leaf blower, then people who program have move from a bare-bones text editor to a code editor.
You're not getting my point. There's obviously a huge market for the rake still, even though something better has come along.
And if a leaf blower isn't a rake, then a "code editor" isn't a text editor. I think my analogy still stands, but you're going to continue to argue anyways. So have fun. Knock yourself out.
-
Jun 27th, 2002, 03:06 PM
#14
I like ConText but the site seems to be down. you can find it at www.zdnet.com/downloads
-
Jun 29th, 2002, 06:07 PM
#15
Lively Member
-
Jun 29th, 2002, 11:44 PM
#16
Stuck in the 80s
Originally posted by mjlogan
EditPlus
That's the 3rd vote for EditPlus
-
Jul 1st, 2002, 08:46 PM
#17
Member
Dreamweaver MX has intrinsic support for PHP (those object list popups for example). I just use Dreamweaver 4 in code view. Arachnophilia is non-WYSIWYG (http://www.arachnophilia.com/) and good too. Notepad is not a good solution despite what people say: because it doesn't auto-intent and the tabs are huge (I think 8 spaces) it makes your code look quite ugly.
-
Jul 1st, 2002, 09:01 PM
#18
LOL looks like I need to download EditPlus...
-
Jul 1st, 2002, 09:39 PM
#19
Junior Member
hey, whats wrong with notepad.... its simple, and easy to use, not one thing wrong with it....
-
Jul 1st, 2002, 09:50 PM
#20
Member
Originally posted by Iamryan2002
hey, whats wrong with notepad.... its simple, and easy to use, not one thing wrong with it....
I just said, no auto-intenting and the tab stops are huge...
-
Jul 1st, 2002, 09:56 PM
#21
Junior Member
ahh, yes.... that is why my code is sooo messy.... actually, I use space for my indents, that way I keep track of my code..
-
Jul 1st, 2002, 11:04 PM
#22
Stuck in the 80s
Originally posted by filburt1
no auto-intenting
Do you have robots come and transport your waste material from your arse to the toilet too, so you don't have to get up from your chair?
As if it's hard to hit the tab key a few times. No, I don't use Notepad, but I don't see what's so horrible about it. And don't repeat yourself, Furby, I heard you the first and second time.
-
Jul 2nd, 2002, 01:42 PM
#23
Junior Member
I use notepad because it is:
1. easy
2. simple
3. small
4. easy....
-
Jul 2nd, 2002, 01:55 PM
#24
but once you code in color you can't go back.
-
Jul 2nd, 2002, 04:41 PM
#25
Stuck in the 80s
Originally posted by scoutt
but once you code in color you can't go back.
You've got a point there I use HomeSite and EditPlus (as I've already stated). I like EditPlus for just PHP stuff, and HomeSite for HTML and PHP stuff.
-
Jul 3rd, 2002, 02:46 AM
#26
Junior Member
I too like editplus .
But I have given these programs a try and have found themuseful too, particularly for php :
Phpeditor
Phpide
-
Jul 4th, 2002, 05:22 PM
#27
Originally posted by The Hobo
Yes, I guess you're right. How can we use a text editor that doesn't write all the code for us and play Mp3's at the same time? You are right. 
It's pretty funny we still use the same rakes they used 100 years ago but we can't seem to use the same text editor they used 15 years ago.
Sorry Hobo, what was the name of that editor again? Still using Notepad myself, but then again l'm a newbie at PHP, and don't know different
-
Jul 4th, 2002, 05:23 PM
#28
Fanatic Member
Notpad is good enough for me, unless their is editors that fix things like when I am missing a { [ ] } ; , " $ u get my point
-
Jul 11th, 2002, 11:32 PM
#29
Hyperactive Member
-
Jul 12th, 2002, 06:55 AM
#30
Fanatic Member
-
Jul 12th, 2002, 07:35 AM
#31
-
Jul 12th, 2002, 07:51 AM
#32
Fanatic Member
3) not very standard like are you
Hey! I'll have you know I program to standards now (for the time being ), but I will not adhere to the Pear "well-formedness" standards as they are just lame and pointless.
"If shortcuts were not meant to be taken, why were they made?"
-
Jul 12th, 2002, 11:23 AM
#33
what other standards are there?
-
Jul 12th, 2002, 09:07 PM
#34
Stuck in the 80s
Originally posted by scoutt
what other standards are there?
Our own? Why abide by something that works for someone else? Find something that works for you, and go with it.
-
Jul 13th, 2002, 08:13 AM
#35
Fanatic Member
no, I pretty much meant, PHP 4.2, PEAR, and our own.
-
Jul 17th, 2002, 01:24 AM
#36
New Member
PHPEdit is a good one. You can download it from http://www.phpedit.org. I am using the developement version and it works all fine.
Or
If you wanna pay for one you can try http://www.phped.com
-
Jul 17th, 2002, 06:56 PM
#37
Fanatic Member
i also use editplus...so thats a 4th vote
i used to use context, but it got annoying ot have to tab over to keep everything in line
Visit www.fragblast.com
Gaming, forums, and a online RPG/Battle system
(__Flagg) DOT NET? is this a Hindi Dating service?
-
Aug 3rd, 2002, 06:13 PM
#38
New Member
Originally posted by The Hobo
Leaf Blower/Sucker? Ever heard of it?
Personally, I prefer a gallon of gasoline and a match. Takes care of that annoying rake, too!
As for PHP editors: Textpad is good, but I've also been known to make heavy use of vim.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width
|