Page 16 of 137 FirstFirst ... 6131415161718192666116 ... LastLast
Results 601 to 640 of 5445

Thread: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

  1. #601
    PowerPoster
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    2,083

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

    Quote Originally Posted by FunkyDexter View Post
    I personally don't think Trump will be cutting off China...
    I've already said that it's not Trump that wants to completely decouple from China, but the shadow government(deep state) behind Trump, these people are controlling Trump. Trump has only two purposes: (1) Re-election (to attack China for re-election) (2) To make money from China

    Quote Originally Posted by FunkyDexter View Post
    @Dreamanor, ... But you do seem to projecting Trump and the GOP's rhetoric onto the members of this forum who really aren't expressing those views. Most of us think China was actually pretty transparent and behaved pretty well during all this and we think the noises you're hearing from Trump etc. are mostly just bluster. Scary bluster, but still just bluster.
    I did not project Trump and the GOP's rhetoric onto the members of this forum. As I said before, I just introduce some information about China to others when I have time and feel bored. Not only does wes4dbt know nothing about China, he does not even understand American politics at all, he does not understand the meaning of "want China's life (want to kill China)".
    Last edited by dreammanor; Apr 20th, 2020 at 11:01 AM.

  2. #602
    Super Moderator Shaggy Hiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    38,989

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

    Quote Originally Posted by dreammanor View Post
    I've already said that it's not Trump that wants to completely decouple from China, but the shadow government(deep state) behind Trump, these people are controlling Trump.
    That's a hoot!! All this time, Trump has been complaining about the deep state acting against him. Now you come along and say that the deep state is controlling him. There IS no deep state. Not his fevered dream of one, nor any other.

    Every person pulls to a greater or lesser extent, and each in a direction of their own choosing. The result of all those different tugs in various directions is the course of any country. Any person or group that would try to control that course is just another tug in just another direction. If they are strong, the course may change in the direction they want, or not, or over correct. If they are more than one person, the course they pull for will, itself, be the result of the different pulls by the different individuals in the group.

    Thinking that there's some intelligence behind the actions of any country is giving people too much credit.
    My usual boring signature: Nothing

  3. #603
    PowerPoster
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    24,482

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

    "Trump rolled over for the Chinese"


  4. #604
    Super Moderator Shaggy Hiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    38,989

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

    At least one sport hasn't been shut down.

    Let the games begin!!!
    My usual boring signature: Nothing

  5. #605
    PowerPoster
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Modesto, Ca.
    Posts
    5,196

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

    That's a hoot!! All this time, Trump has been complaining about the deep state acting against him. Now you come along and say that the deep state is controlling him. There IS no deep state. Not his fevered dream of one, nor any other.
    That's a relief, I thought maybe the Opus Dei really was controlling everything. But we must be diligent and keep our eyes on those sneaky FreeMasons.
    Last edited by wes4dbt; Apr 20th, 2020 at 12:56 PM.

  6. #606
    Super Moderator FunkyDexter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    An obscure body in the SK system. The inhabitants call it Earth
    Posts
    7,900

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

    "Trump rolled over for the Chinese"
    For once I think you're being unfair to Trump. It's international politics and he has precisely zero jurisdiction in China. He never had any ability to insist on sending American inspectors into China and, had he tried, China would almost certainly have told where he could stick them (which would have amounted to a gagging order in his case). If Biden's calling that "rolling over" for the Chinese he's being disingenuous. And if Biden thinks he could have done any better on that he's deluded.

    However, I do think his previous fawning over Xi demonstrates exactly how hollow his criticisms of the WHO are but that's the problem the WHO faces. People try to put them down.

    the shadow government(deep state) behind Trump
    Oh, that's what you're referring to. Yeah, couldn't disagree more I'm afraid. Trump isn't president due to some clandestine conspiracy, he's president because he played to populism, was lucky enough to be running against one of the most hated candidates in the history of the Democrat party and he had a much more savvy machine behind him.
    The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter - Winston Churchill

    Hadoop actually sounds more like the way they greet each other in Yorkshire - Inferrd

  7. #607
    Super Moderator Shaggy Hiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    38,989

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

    Quote Originally Posted by FunkyDexter View Post
    However, I do think his previous fawning over Xi demonstrates exactly how hollow his criticisms of the WHO are but that's the problem the WHO faces. People try to put them down.
    I see what you did there.
    Just because you get around...
    My usual boring signature: Nothing

  8. #608
    PowerPoster
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    24,482

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

    Quote Originally Posted by FunkyDexter View Post
    For once I think you're being unfair to Trump.
    My point is that demonizing Trump regarding China is pointless since his opposition now tries doing the same on steroids. Just when you feel Trump has reached new lows his antagonists find a way to be even worse.

    Pelosi and her luxury ice cream show-and-tell as half of L.A. is jobless comes to mind. Now we have Biden out front crapping hard on China.

    Trump is awful, no question in my mind. His opposition however is far worse. Pence is pretty darned scary in his own right as a political zealot. These are tough times.

  9. #609
    Super Moderator FunkyDexter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    An obscure body in the SK system. The inhabitants call it Earth
    Posts
    7,900

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

    Pelosi and her luxury ice cream show-and-tell
    I wasn't aware of any of this until I googled your phrase. To me the criticisms she was making seem valid. What criticisms do you think were incorrect? (I really only speed read it and didn't dig in)

    I'm certainly not averse to criticising that Biden campaign film but are you seriously comparing that one video to the constant stream of politicising and misinformation that Trump is engaged in? It's included everything from touting cures that don't actually work to using the official Virus update meeting to play his own fluff films.
    Last edited by FunkyDexter; Apr 21st, 2020 at 03:03 AM.
    The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter - Winston Churchill

    Hadoop actually sounds more like the way they greet each other in Yorkshire - Inferrd

  10. #610
    Wall Poster TysonLPrice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    3,834

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

    the most hated candidates in the history of the Democrat party
    Do you mean the one that won the popular vote by almost three million more votes than Trump?
    Please remember next time...elections matter!

  11. #611
    Super Moderator FunkyDexter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    An obscure body in the SK system. The inhabitants call it Earth
    Posts
    7,900

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

    Yeah, that's the one. It's possible to be both hated and popular and she seemed to qualify. You can go with "divisive" if you prefer.
    The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter - Winston Churchill

    Hadoop actually sounds more like the way they greet each other in Yorkshire - Inferrd

  12. #612
    PowerPoster
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    7,219

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

    Quote Originally Posted by Shaggy Hiker View Post
    Every person pulls to a greater or lesser extent, and each in a direction of their own choosing.
    The result of all those different tugs in various directions is the course of any country.
    Any person or group that would try to control that course is just another tug in just another direction.
    Right, so you are saying that there are "persons with aligned interests" which might form "groups" -
    and that these groups will have a "certain influence on decisions of the state".

    Hmm, and the degree of influence of these "interest-aligned groups" might be related to:
    - their power (mostly due to the sheer amount of accumulated money available to these groups,
    .. combined with the fact that most states are "hugely indebted")
    - then there's also security-related influence (thinking about CIA, NSA etc.)
    - and that many "heads" in those powerful groups remain in their position across several parliamentary periods

    So I think, everyone here would agree, that the "pull" (on certain decisions of the state) as you've put it,
    is certainly substantial from these groups.

    Now looking for a term, which might summarize these influential groups...
    ... which are certainly "dug in deep" ...
    (as in "hard to remove" ... because ... no "elections" and no "periods of office" there -
    you know, to "mix them up" from time to time)

    Hmm... think I got it, let's just call them:
    "deep dug-in, hard to remove powerful groups, who influence the state"

    Too long for you? ... please feel free, to shorten it to your liking...

    Olaf

  13. #613
    Wall Poster TysonLPrice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    3,834

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

    both hated and popular and she seemed to qualify
    Another way to say that is republican hated and democratic popular and she seemed to qualify

    Yep...some people call it a two party system.
    Please remember next time...elections matter!

  14. #614
    PowerPoster
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    24,482

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.


  15. #615
    Super Moderator FunkyDexter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    An obscure body in the SK system. The inhabitants call it Earth
    Posts
    7,900

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

    Another way to say that is republican hated and democratic popular and she seemed to qualify
    I got the impression she's pretty much reviled by large sections of the Democrat party too. Particularly the hard left (or as hard left as you guys get in the US)

    @Dil, that's the objection? That she's wealthy and likes ice cream? It's hardly political dynamite. Were you expecting her to open up a fridge full of hair shirts?
    Last edited by FunkyDexter; Apr 21st, 2020 at 09:26 AM.
    The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter - Winston Churchill

    Hadoop actually sounds more like the way they greet each other in Yorkshire - Inferrd

  16. #616
    Super Moderator Shaggy Hiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    38,989

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

    Quote Originally Posted by Schmidt View Post
    Right, so you are saying that there are "persons with aligned interests" which might form "groups" -
    and that these groups will have a "certain influence on decisions of the state".

    Hmm, and the degree of influence of these "interest-aligned groups" might be related to:
    - their power (mostly due to the sheer amount of accumulated money available to these groups,
    .. combined with the fact that most states are "hugely indebted")
    - then there's also security-related influence (thinking about CIA, NSA etc.)
    - and that many "heads" in those powerful groups remain in their position across several parliamentary periods

    So I think, everyone here would agree, that the "pull" (on certain decisions of the state) as you've put it,
    is certainly substantial from these groups.

    Now looking for a term, which might summarize these influential groups...
    ... which are certainly "dug in deep" ...
    (as in "hard to remove" ... because ... no "elections" and no "periods of office" there -
    you know, to "mix them up" from time to time)

    Hmm... think I got it, let's just call them:
    "deep dug-in, hard to remove powerful groups, who influence the state"

    Too long for you? ... please feel free, to shorten it to your liking...

    Olaf
    Okay, I'll shorten it to a single word: Lobbyists.

    I thought you had a point, but after reading what you wrote a few times, I'm not sure whether you were serious or making a joke. Politics is ALL about influence. People band together to amplify influence, even though all the people banding together don't share that single view, they DO prefer the direction of pull of the lobbying effort, or else they leave the cause. That's how politics works. That's how politics has ALWAYS worked, whether in democracies, dictatorships, or any other form of government from the state to the local fishing club.

    That's not the deep state that people talk about.
    My usual boring signature: Nothing

  17. #617
    PowerPoster
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    2,083

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

    Today, Yu Xiangdong, deputy dean of Hubei Huangshi Central Hospital and director of the Quality Management Department of Edong Medical Group, was removed from office. The reason for his dismissal was that he mocked the Chinese government's anti-epidemic measures taken in the prevention and treatment of new coronavirus pneumonia, such as wearing masks, home management, closure of the city, and CT examinations during the screening of admitted patients. He also mocked the efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine on new coronavirus pneumonia.

    Mr. Yu Xiangdong is one of the few people in China who has high scientific literacy and dares to fight pseudoscience (traditional Chinese medicine). He is also a person I admire very much. This incident should be a real example of China's lack of freedom of speech. I feel very sorry.

    If American medical officials continue to ridicule the Trump administration's epidemic prevention measures, will will these medical officials be removed from office?
    Last edited by dreammanor; Apr 21st, 2020 at 06:13 PM.

  18. #618
    Wall Poster TysonLPrice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    3,834

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

    "If American medical officials keep taunting the Trump administration's epidemic prevention measures, will he be removed from office?"

    Not as long as republicans have the majority in the Senate...
    Please remember next time...elections matter!

  19. #619
    PowerPoster
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    2,083

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

    Quote Originally Posted by TysonLPrice View Post
    "If American medical officials keep taunting the Trump administration's epidemic prevention measures, will he be removed from office?"

    Not as long as republicans have the majority in the Senate...
    Sorry, what I want to ask is whether those medical officials who laugh at Trump will be removed from office?

  20. #620
    Wall Poster TysonLPrice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    3,834

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

    Quote Originally Posted by dreammanor View Post
    Sorry, what I want to ask is whether those medical officials who laugh at Trump will be removed from office?
    There is a real good chance that could happen. Just like an other serious minded expert that challenged him. Also just like anyone that remotely was part of his impeachment. He is gutting government institutions that he thinks aren't loyal to him. Why should Medical experts be exempt.
    Please remember next time...elections matter!

  21. #621
    Super Moderator Shaggy Hiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    38,989

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

    If they can be fired by Trump, they will be. There are few people that Trump CAN fire that he has NOT fired. He's been churning through appointed officials like it was some kind of bad reality show. He wants unquestioning obedience and if he doesn't get it, he gets rid of the person.

    However, he lacks the authority to get rid of the people who are criticizing him, or else he would have. He REALLY wants to get rid of Dr. Fauci, but at this point, the doctor is more popular than Trump, so he doesn't dare. As soon as he feels he can, he will. I was going to make that prediction a few weeks ago, but by that point, it was so obvious that it was kind of like predicting that water would be wet.
    My usual boring signature: Nothing

  22. #622
    PowerPoster
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    2,083

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

    The other is about press freedom. A few days ago, the New York Times interviewed Sima Nan, a Chinese political commentator, for more than 40 minutes. I listened to the entire recording of the interview. But when the New York Times published this interview report, it just excerpted one sentence "Fang Fang has become a political tool" from the interview text of more than 10,000 words. The true meaning of Sima Nan's conversation is completely blocked.

    I guess this is why the vast majority of Americans do not understand China at all ( or know nothing about China).
    Last edited by dreammanor; Apr 21st, 2020 at 12:07 PM.

  23. #623
    Wall Poster TysonLPrice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    3,834

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

    Quote Originally Posted by Shaggy Hiker View Post
    If they can be fired by Trump, they will be. There are few people that Trump CAN fire that he has NOT fired. He's been churning through appointed officials like it was some kind of bad reality show. He wants unquestioning obedience and if he doesn't get it, he gets rid of the person.

    However, he lacks the authority to get rid of the people who are criticizing him, or else he would have. He REALLY wants to get rid of Dr. Fauci, but at this point, the doctor is more popular than Trump, so he doesn't dare. As soon as he feels he can, he will. I was going to make that prediction a few weeks ago, but by that point, it was so obvious that it was kind of like predicting that water would be wet.
    Speaking about Dr. Fauci...some Southern republican Governors are opening up their states against the science based recommendations. With absolutely no evidence I think Trump and his surrogates are behind that. I bet we don't see Dr. Fauci in tonight's nightly campaign speech. I think he would disagree with what those Governors are doing.
    Please remember next time...elections matter!

  24. #624
    PowerPoster
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Modesto, Ca.
    Posts
    5,196

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

    I got the impression she's pretty much reviled by large sections of the Democrat party too. Particularly the hard left (or as hard left as you guys get in the US)
    Yeah, I've felt that the only reason Trump got elected was because a large amount of people were voting against Hillary. Don't know if she is the most hated ever.

    But I will agree with Dil on this "These are tough times". I can't hardly believe for two presidential elections in a row both candidates are terrible. I wouldn't call either of them a leader. Biden is such a marshmallow. But at least Biden is not morally bankrupt and I think he cares about the American people. Trump only cares about Trump. He had a chance to be a leader because of the virus. But instead, he's more worried about his ratings than about how many people die. And he is just incapable of being honest with the American people. Now I know politicians misleading people isn't rare, but this is some real next level stuff.

    I was critical of many of our presidents through the years. I feel like I owe them all an apology, never realized how good we had it.

  25. #625
    PowerPoster
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    24,482

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

    The ice cream was merely insult added to injury. Pelosi's corruption and anti-human actions go on and on.

    Last edited by dilettante; Apr 21st, 2020 at 02:38 PM.

  26. #626
    Super Moderator Shaggy Hiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    38,989

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

    After all these years, I gotta ask: Dilettante, is there ANYBODY you actually LIKE?
    My usual boring signature: Nothing

  27. #627
    PowerPoster
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    24,482

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

    Politicians? Darned few. Maybe Dennis Kucinich.

    Aside from that?




  28. #628
    PowerPoster
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    7,219

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

    Quote Originally Posted by Shaggy Hiker View Post
    Okay, I'll shorten it to a single word: Lobbyists.
    I thought you had a point, but after reading what you wrote a few times, I'm not sure whether you were serious or making a joke.
    Let's say, I was "half-serious" (writing all this with a bit of "gallows humor",
    though trying to "stick to true statements", whilst doing so).

    As for Lobbyists - sure, ... a proper, nice sounding, politically correct word -
    and some of "those groups" indeed keep their lobbyism "civil and legal" (when trying to "pull" in a certain direction) -
    others (the real powerful groups) - well, ... not so much.

    Have encountered just too many "wag the dog"-moments over the last two decades,
    to be anything else but desillusioned about these constructs, we call "western democracies"
    (or more precise; what these once well-working constructs have evolved into in recent years).

    A few decades ago, we voted for the "best person", or the "best party" (in the words true sense) -
    whereas nowadays we kind of squirm whilst trying, to place our votes on the "lesser of several bad choices".
    And worst of all, we find that "normal" (or try to tell ourselves, that the "the emperor in front of us is not naked").

    It's clearly observable, that this "crazy train" is rolling ever faster and faster -
    and we see quite clearly that its increasing speed (where no one can risk, to invest time, to really care),
    will finally lead to disaster - but nobody seems to be able - or willing - to go looking for the breaks anytime soon.
    (because the first one who breaks, will fall-back and never catch-up again)

    On that note (and coming back to the topic at hand...) - the current virus seemed to be a good chance,
    because suddenly every state, company or person had to indeed "break at the same time" (on a global level).

    Don't know, if anybody else had similar thoughts in the first few weeks of "the shut-down" ...
    but the whole thing had a certain "nostalgic, healthy air" to it, when everything around us "magically slowed down"...

    But I already see the the signals for "full-speed ahead" getting green-ish again, (chances wasted).

    Olaf

  29. #629
    Super Moderator Shaggy Hiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    38,989

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

    I'm not nearly that pessimistic, but I do see your point.

    I'm not sure that any group ever saw the situation as any better in their day. In the US, we are more polarized than we have been in a LONG time, but out politics were never all that polite. Furthermore, we could fix things, and are....slowly.

    In the US, our system sets us up to be polarized. Biden isn't a great candidate, but he's what came out of the primary system, which has plenty of flaws. We can't get a third party, because any viable third party can only win by cannibalizing one of the existing parties. Until that time, all a third party candidate does is weakens one of the two existing parties, making the other one virtually certain to win (assuming the third party gets any appreciable number of votes), and that's never what the supporters of the third party candidate really want. If they splintered off one of the main parties, then they'd prefer their person to win first, second they'd go for the candidate of the party they splintered off from, and the other party winning is a distant third. This creates a powerful incentive to abandon third parties, and that's what usually happens.

    The primary process also makes people increasingly partisan. Both parties have to tack towards their respective corners to win the primary, then back towards the center for the general election. What Trump did, that was unusual, is NOT tack back to the center, but bet that he could win with angry white guys alone, as long as he got them angry enough. It worked...more or less, though he lost the popular vote, so it's also possible to say that his coalition wasn't really large enough.

    We could fix it all by switching to rank voting, or one of the other systems. This would certainly create new kinds of problems, because no system is free of them, but it would get rid of our partisan divide.

    Fixing our legislative districts would also get rid of the partisan divide, though not at the presidential level. Gerrymandering favors one party over another, which is why it is done. It could be eliminated entirely, but would take a constitutional amendment that those currently in office would certainly oppose, at the moment, since they are the winners under the current system, and would lose under a system that didn't favor them.

    So, it could be fixed, it just might not.

    The first that will go is likely the electoral college, which may just disappear. Many states have signed onto an agreement that their delegates will vote split according to the popular vote. If enough states do that, the electoral college won't be a thing anymore, so popular vote will decide the election, instead of the electoral college. That's seeming likely, eventually. Some states are also going to different voting systems. We'll see what comes of it all.
    My usual boring signature: Nothing

  30. #630
    Wall Poster TysonLPrice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    3,834

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

    Quote Originally Posted by Shaggy Hiker View Post
    I'm not nearly that pessimistic, but I do see your point.

    I'm not sure that any group ever saw the situation as any better in their day. In the US, we are more polarized than we have been in a LONG time, but out politics were never all that polite. Furthermore, we could fix things, and are....slowly.

    In the US, our system sets us up to be polarized. Biden isn't a great candidate, but he's what came out of the primary system, which has plenty of flaws. We can't get a third party, because any viable third party can only win by cannibalizing one of the existing parties. Until that time, all a third party candidate does is weakens one of the two existing parties, making the other one virtually certain to win (assuming the third party gets any appreciable number of votes), and that's never what the supporters of the third party candidate really want. If they splintered off one of the main parties, then they'd prefer their person to win first, second they'd go for the candidate of the party they splintered off from, and the other party winning is a distant third. This creates a powerful incentive to abandon third parties, and that's what usually happens.

    The primary process also makes people increasingly partisan. Both parties have to tack towards their respective corners to win the primary, then back towards the center for the general election. What Trump did, that was unusual, is NOT tack back to the center, but bet that he could win with angry white guys alone, as long as he got them angry enough. It worked...more or less, though he lost the popular vote, so it's also possible to say that his coalition wasn't really large enough.

    We could fix it all by switching to rank voting, or one of the other systems. This would certainly create new kinds of problems, because no system is free of them, but it would get rid of our partisan divide.

    Fixing our legislative districts would also get rid of the partisan divide, though not at the presidential level. Gerrymandering favors one party over another, which is why it is done. It could be eliminated entirely, but would take a constitutional amendment that those currently in office would certainly oppose, at the moment, since they are the winners under the current system, and would lose under a system that didn't favor them.

    So, it could be fixed, it just might not.

    The first that will go is likely the electoral college, which may just disappear. Many states have signed onto an agreement that their delegates will vote split according to the popular vote. If enough states do that, the electoral college won't be a thing anymore, so popular vote will decide the election, instead of the electoral college. That's seeming likely, eventually. Some states are also going to different voting systems. We'll see what comes of it all.
    I agree with a lot of that. Along those lines I wonder if we could take the elections out of lobbyist control with government paying for elections somehow to viable candidates? Doesn't the UK have something along those lines?
    Please remember next time...elections matter!

  31. #631
    Super Moderator Shaggy Hiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    38,989

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

    That probably wouldn't take anything out of lobbyists control. We'd have to stop third-party advertising, and I'm not sure how that could be done. I doubt that you could build such a wall that people wouldn't get over it. The stakes are WAY too high for interested people not to want to influence the outcome by any means fair or foul.
    My usual boring signature: Nothing

  32. #632
    PowerPoster
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Modesto, Ca.
    Posts
    5,196

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

    I agree with a lot of that. Along those lines I wonder if we could take the elections out of lobbyist control with government paying for elections somehow to viable candidates? Doesn't the UK have something along those lines?
    I've thought along those lines for a long time.

    I think it would have a large positive affect (or effect, never have figured that out for sure). There would have to be some type of oversight organization and there would be cries of advertising censorship. It wouldn't be 100% successful but what is. Probably not going to happen because the lobbyist on both sides don't want it.

    but out politics were never all that polite
    Very very true.

  33. #633
    PowerPoster
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    24,482

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

    Weird:


  34. #634
    Wall Poster TysonLPrice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    3,834

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

    https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/21/healt...nes/index.html

    "Fox News has fallen out of love with hydroxychloroquine. After weeks of unrelenting coverage hyping the antimalarial drug as a potential game-changing treatment for the coronavirus, the network has all but stopped mentioning it on its airwaves. So has President Donald Trump.

    The quite abandonment of hydroxychloroquine comes as studies indicate it is not an effective treatment against the coronavirus. A French study found last week that the drug does not help patients with the virus. And on Tuesday, a study of hundreds of patents at US Veterans Health Administration medical centers found that patients who took hydroxychloroquine were no less likely to need ventilation and had higher death rates than those who didn't take the drug."

    Day after day Trump and fox news promoted the use of hydroxychloroquine with that moron Trump telling people "take it, what can it hurt". This was the height of irresponsibility. Now that studies proved them wrong they just shut up. They just stopped promoting it without saying they were wrong. Not even reporting it doesn't work and that it can even be harmful. In the meantime there were fears that supplies for people that need it for the purposes it was designed for were threatened.

    I just understand why there isn't more outrage against what those two, Fox and Trump, do hand in hand to harm our society. I wonder how many people harmed them selves listening to Dr. Trump and the Fox medical institute?

    Update:

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/rachels.../#3d5c31eb4b40

    A panel of medical experts from the National Institutes of Health on Tuesday recommended against using the combination of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin to treat the coronavirus outside clinical trials, undercutting President Donald Trump’s early claims that the drugs were a promising treatment for the disease.
    Last edited by TysonLPrice; Apr 22nd, 2020 at 07:46 AM.
    Please remember next time...elections matter!

  35. #635
    Super Moderator FunkyDexter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    An obscure body in the SK system. The inhabitants call it Earth
    Posts
    7,900

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

    Pelosi's corruption and anti-human actions go on and on.
    I didn't follow it fully (mainly because it's couched in a lot of terminology that's specific to the debate in the US and doesn't travel well) but I think his point was that it would be better for US government to pay for treatment direct rather than covering insurance premiums, have I understood that correctly? If so, yeah, I agree. I think the insurance system you guys run is bizarre and exists purely to allow a bunch of middle men to syphon off loads of cash from the system without actually any concrete value.

    I'd go further though. In the UK the supplier of treatment is the government (this isn't strictly true, we've been admitting more and more private sector into the system since the 90s, but the principle is there). So nobodies paying anyone anything, we simply provide the treatment at the point of need and our government run NHS procures the materials it needs to do so.

    I don't know enough about the debate over there to either justify or condemn Pelosi's position but I get the impression you guys (collectively) have been rejecting any move in that direction throughout the last 3 Presidential terms haven't you? It seems unfair to lay that at Pelosi's door but, as I said, I don't fully understand that argument so I'm likely missing a nuance.
    The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter - Winston Churchill

    Hadoop actually sounds more like the way they greet each other in Yorkshire - Inferrd

  36. #636
    PowerPoster
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    24,482

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

    The nuance is that she proposes that the government pay COBRA health insurance premiums to the insurance industry for newly unemployed people rather than cutting them out and providing direct coverage without a profiteering middleman. Those are some of her biggest donors after the military industry. Her scheme also does nothing for anybody not facing COBRA, which is a system that allows laid off workers to pay their former employer's share of health insurance premiums.

    It is no accident that she has accumulated over $100M in personal wealth since first taking office. Influence peddling can do that for you.

  37. #637
    Wall Poster TysonLPrice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    3,834

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

    And the hits just keep coming...

    Trump tweets he instructed the Navy to ‘shoot down and destroy’ Iranian gunboats that ‘harass’ U.S. ships

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...7c7_story.html

    Coincidentally he tweeted that shortly after Fox had aired video of Iranian speed boats harassing US ships in the Gulf. That harassment has been going on for quite a while now albeit this was more aggressive than past ones.

    So in the middle of a global pandemic the moron in chief is going to start a military offensive that would suck in our allies and bring war to the middle east. Try social distancing during a war . I don't think he is deflecting blame with this maneuver like blaming WHO, China, the democrats, the media, etc. I think it is just the moron being the moron.

    I'm anxious to see how he walks this back, if he does at all. I'd also bet when he tweeted that he hadn't said a word to the military.
    Please remember next time...elections matter!

  38. #638
    Super Moderator Shaggy Hiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    38,989

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

    Quote Originally Posted by dilettante View Post
    The nuance is that she proposes that the government pay COBRA health insurance premiums to the insurance industry for newly unemployed people rather than cutting them out and providing direct coverage without a profiteering middleman. Those are some of her biggest donors after the military industry. Her scheme also does nothing for anybody not facing COBRA, which is a system that allows laid off workers to pay their former employer's share of health insurance premiums.

    It is no accident that she has accumulated over $100M in personal wealth since first taking office. Influence peddling can do that for you.
    The US health care industry is the largest lobbying group in the country, taken as an aggregate (it's not just one thing). There is bipartisan reluctance to go against the interests there, hence the watered down health care bills we end up with. I don't really like that idea, either, but I do recognize that it is the path of least resistance. If the goal is to get the job done, I can see the point in taking that approach at the moment, rather than fighting against the grain. Providing direct coverage would be vigorously opposed by lots of groups, including most of Congress, for various reasons. Personally, I don't see how that would work. Seems like it would involve creating a lot of work identifying people to get the money to, which would have other knock-on effects. However, I'm not all that familiar with COBRA. I only know that they are the perennial opponents of G. I. Joe, and I don't know why we are paying their health insurance premiums in the first place.
    My usual boring signature: Nothing

  39. #639
    PowerPoster
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    2,083

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

    Deleted ...
    Last edited by dreammanor; Apr 22nd, 2020 at 11:29 AM.

  40. #640
    Wall Poster TysonLPrice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    3,834

    Re: Corona virus, China major city lockdowns, etc.

    Quote Originally Posted by Shaggy Hiker View Post
    The US health care industry is the largest lobbying group in the country, taken as an aggregate (it's not just one thing). There is bipartisan reluctance to go against the interests there, hence the watered down health care bills we end up with. I don't really like that idea, either, but I do recognize that it is the path of least resistance. If the goal is to get the job done, I can see the point in taking that approach at the moment, rather than fighting against the grain. Providing direct coverage would be vigorously opposed by lots of groups, including most of Congress, for various reasons. Personally, I don't see how that would work. Seems like it would involve creating a lot of work identifying people to get the money to, which would have other knock-on effects. However, I'm not all that familiar with COBRA. I only know that they are the perennial opponents of G. I. Joe, and I don't know why we are paying their health insurance premiums in the first place.
    It is the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA). I've used it a couple of times. When you leave a job you can pay for the insurance your employer was providing for a while (I forget how long) at the same rate you employer had been paying. If offers continuity and a break in the cost of going out and getting your own.
    Please remember next time...elections matter!

Page 16 of 137 FirstFirst ... 6131415161718192666116 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  



Click Here to Expand Forum to Full Width